Skip to content
Taylor Community at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Private foundation

Taylor Community

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$37kPhilanthropy$16kHealth$13kHuman Services$10kCommunity Improvement$5kEducation$3kRecreation & Sports$2kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$152M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BELKNAP MILL SOCIETY$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
WRIGHT MUSEUM OF WWII$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
LAKES REGION COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS$1,800
POWERHOUSE THEATRE$1,500
LEADERSHIP LAKES REGION$1,025
NEW HAMPSHIRE BOAT MUSEUM$1,000
NH LONG TERM CARE FOUNDATION$1,000
GRANITE STATE ELITE SOFTBALL$500
THE VILLAGE PLAYERS$500
FRIENDS OF GILFORD FOOTBALL$500
HUOT TECHNICAL CENTER$500
CLEARLAKES CHORALE$500
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LAKES REGION CANCER SUPPORT TEAM: $3k → 9%INTERLAKES COMMUNITY CAREGIVERS INC: $2k → 9%INTERLAKES COMMUNITY CAREGIVERS: $250 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$74k · 27 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
34

Total granted

$74k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+43%

Still filing today

48%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEnvironmentHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GU
    GRANITE UNITED WAY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $3k · revenue +40%
  • LA
    LACONIA AREA COMMUNITY LAND TRUST INC
    2× · 2019–2025 · $2k · revenue +156%
  • IC
    Interlakes Community Caregivers Inc
    2× · 2022–2024 · $2k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • LR
    LAKES REGION CANCER SUPPORT TEAM INC
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue 0%
  • GS
    GRANITE STATE UNITED WAY
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • CC
    CAMDEN CONFERENCEgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue +50%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Hampshire Lakes Association Inc

To restore and preserve the health of new hampshire's lakes.

Environment
2
Lakes Region Conservation Trust

The mission of the Organization is the conservation of the natural resources of the Lakes Region of New Hampshire, the preservation of wildlife habitat, the stewardship of lands that define the character of the region and its quality of…

Environment
3
Lake Winnipesaukee Historical Society

To preserve the history of lake winnipesaukee and vicinity by maintaining a year-round museum sponsoring lectures & other programs, and supporting area historical societies.

Arts & Culture
4
Lakes Region Model Railroad Museum Inc

To provide a museum depicting the importance of the railroad industry to the economic development of the lakes region of new hamphire. the museum will display a model railroad and its routes within caroll county, new hampshire.

Arts & Culture
5
Loon Echo Land Trust Inc

Loon Echo Land Trust protects land in the northern Sebago Lake region to conserve its natural resources and character for future generations.

Environment
6
Squam Lakes Natural Science Center

To advance understanding of ecology by exploring new hampshire's natural world.

Environment
7
Lakes Region Search and Rescue Inc
Public Safety & Disaster
8
Lake George Land Conservancy Inc

Dedicated to permanently preserve the natural, scenic and recreational resources of the Lake George Basin.

Environment
9
North Country Center for the Arts Inc

A premier center for the arts in the white mountain area of new hampshire

Arts & Culture
10
Lakes Region Consumer Advisory Board

LRCABs mission is to provide peer support to those who are currently receiving or have received mental health services and to empower them to control their own lives and to influence the resources that affect their lives.

Health
11
Lake Champlain Land Trust Inc

The mission of the lake champlain land trust is to save the scenic beauty, natural communities, and recreational amenities of lake champlain by permanently preserving significant islands, shoreline areas, and natural communities in the…

Environment
12
The Lake Placid Sinfonietta Inc

The lake placid sinfonietta, the adirondacks orchestra of world class musicians, unleashes the power of music to entertain, educate and inspire people of all ages.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Lakes Region Mental Health Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Village Players. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
15/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NH LONG TERM CARE FOUNDATION: $7,000 · OtherNH LONG TERM CARE FOUNDATIONPOWERHOUSE THEATRE: $5,750 · OtherPOWERHOUSE THEATREGILDA'S CLUB NH: $4,500 · OtherGILDA'S CLUB NHIndividual grant recipient: $3,350 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLEADERSHIP LAKES REGION: $3,025 · OtherLEADERSHIP LAKES REGIONGRANITE UNITED WAY: $3,000 · OtherGREATER LAKES REGION CHILDRENS AUCTION: $2,588 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,500 · OtherHUOT TECHNICAL CENTER: $2,500 · OtherGRANITE STATE UNITED WAY: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · Other+45 more: $18,363 · Other+45 moreThe Wright Museum of World War II: $10,000 · Arts & CultureThe Wright Museum of World War IITHE WINNIPESAUKEE PLAYHOUSE: $7,700 · Arts & CultureTHE WINNIPESAUKEE PLAYHOUSEBELKNAP MILL SOCIETY: $4,750 · Arts & CultureBELKNAP MILL SOCIETYNEW HAMPSHIRE BOAT MUSEUM: $4,000 · Arts & CultureNEW HAMPSHIRE BOAT MUSEUMThe Village Players: $1,500 · Arts & CultureThe Village Players+1 more: $100 · Arts & CultureLAKES REGION CANCER SUPPORT TEAM INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesInterlakes Community Caregivers Inc: $1,750 · Human ServicesLACONIA AREA COMMUNITY LAND TRUST INC: $1,900 · Housing & ShelterEASTERN LAKES REGION HOUSING COALITION INC: $250 · Housing & ShelterTHE LAKES REGION MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $750 · HealthGranite VNA Inc: $600 · HealthLAKES REGION CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $550 · Community ImprovementLoon Preservation Committee: $350 · EnvironmentMOHONK PRESERVE INC: $100 · Environment
Other$56,576Arts & Culture$28,050Human Services$4,250Housing & Shelter$2,150Health$1,350Community Improvement$550Environment$450

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Wright Museum of World War II: $10,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHE WINNIPESAUKEE PLAYHOUSE: $7,700 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBELKNAP MILL SOCIETY: $4,750 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNEW HAMPSHIRE BOAT MUSEUM: $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLAKES REGION CANCER SUPPORT TEAM INC: $2,500 over 1y, 23% of budgetLACONIA AREA COMMUNITY LAND TRUST INC: $1,900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInterlakes Community Caregivers Inc: $1,750 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCLEARLAKES CHORALE INC: $1,500 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetThe Village Players: $1,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetLake Winnipesaukee Association: $1,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCAMDEN CONFERENCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE LAKES REGION MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGranite VNA Inc: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAKES REGION CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $550 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNEW HAMPSHIRE CENTER FOR NONPROFITS: $380 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLoon Preservation Committee: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLAKES REGION TOURISM ASSOCIATION: $329 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEASTERN LAKES REGION HOUSING COALITION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMOHONK PRESERVE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAKES REGION SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetADVICE TO THE PLAYERS: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLAKES REGION SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Wright Museum of World War II ↗
  • Who funds THE WINNIPESAUKEE PLAYHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds BELKNAP MILL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE BOAT MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds GRANITE UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds LAKES REGION CANCER SUPPORT TEAM INC ↗
  • Who funds LACONIA AREA COMMUNITY LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds Interlakes Community Caregivers Inc ↗
  • Who funds CLEARLAKES CHORALE INC ↗
  • Who funds The Village Players ↗
  • Who funds Lake Winnipesaukee Association ↗
  • Who funds CAMDEN CONFERENCE ↗
  • Who funds THE LAKES REGION MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Granite VNA Inc ↗
  • Who funds LAKES REGION CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds Cultural Arts Center of the Lakes Region ↗
  • Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE CENTER FOR NONPROFITS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charita…Bank of New Hampshire…The Booth FoundationCogswell Benevolent T…The Anthony & Gladys …Eversource Energy Fou…The Ayco Charitable F…Ibm International Fou…American Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH35.5× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Bank of New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · The Booth Foundation · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · The Anthony & Gladys Sakowich Charitable Foundation · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Taylor Community funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Taylor Community. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Taylor’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home