· Private foundation
Taylor Community
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WRIGHT MUSEUM OF WWII | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| BELKNAP MILL SOCIETY | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| LAKES REGION COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS | $1,800 |
| POWERHOUSE THEATRE | $1,500 |
| LEADERSHIP LAKES REGION | $1,025 |
| NH LONG TERM CARE FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| NEW HAMPSHIRE BOAT MUSEUM | $1,000 |
| THE VILLAGE PLAYERS | $500 |
| FRIENDS OF GILFORD FOOTBALL | $500 |
| CLEARLAKES CHORALE | $500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| GRANITE STATE ELITE SOFTBALL | $500 |
| HUOT TECHNICAL CENTER | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
27 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GUGRANITE UNITED WAY2× · 2017–2018 · $3k · revenue +40%
- LALACONIA AREA COMMUNITY LAND TRUST INC2× · 2019–2025 · $2k · revenue +156%
- ICInterlakes Community Caregivers Inc2× · 2022–2024 · $2k · revenue +13%
Funded once
- LRLAKES REGION CANCER SUPPORT TEAM INCone grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue 0%
- GSGRANITE STATE UNITED WAYone grant, 2020 · $2k
- CCCAMDEN CONFERENCEgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue +50%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To restore and preserve the health of new hampshire's lakes.
The mission of the Organization is the conservation of the natural resources of the Lakes Region of New Hampshire, the preservation of wildlife habitat, the stewardship of lands that define the character of the region and its quality of…
To preserve the history of lake winnipesaukee and vicinity by maintaining a year-round museum sponsoring lectures & other programs, and supporting area historical societies.
To provide a museum depicting the importance of the railroad industry to the economic development of the lakes region of new hamphire. the museum will display a model railroad and its routes within caroll county, new hampshire.
Loon Echo Land Trust protects land in the northern Sebago Lake region to conserve its natural resources and character for future generations.
To advance understanding of ecology by exploring new hampshire's natural world.
Dedicated to permanently preserve the natural, scenic and recreational resources of the Lake George Basin.
A premier center for the arts in the white mountain area of new hampshire
LRCABs mission is to provide peer support to those who are currently receiving or have received mental health services and to empower them to control their own lives and to influence the resources that affect their lives.
The mission of the lake champlain land trust is to save the scenic beauty, natural communities, and recreational amenities of lake champlain by permanently preserving significant islands, shoreline areas, and natural communities in the…
The lake placid sinfonietta, the adirondacks orchestra of world class musicians, unleashes the power of music to entertain, educate and inspire people of all ages.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Lakes Region Mental Health Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Village Players. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Wright Museum of World War II ↗
- Who funds THE WINNIPESAUKEE PLAYHOUSE ↗
- Who funds BELKNAP MILL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE BOAT MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds GRANITE UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds LAKES REGION CANCER SUPPORT TEAM INC ↗
- Who funds LACONIA AREA COMMUNITY LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds Interlakes Community Caregivers Inc ↗
- Who funds CLEARLAKES CHORALE INC ↗
- Who funds Lake Winnipesaukee Association ↗
- Who funds The Village Players ↗
- Who funds CAMDEN CONFERENCE ↗
- Who funds THE LAKES REGION MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Granite VNA Inc ↗
- Who funds LAKES REGION CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds Cultural Arts Center of the Lakes Region ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE CENTER FOR NONPROFITS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Bank of New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · The Booth Foundation · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · The Anthony & Gladys Sakowich Charitable Foundation · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Taylor Community funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.