Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tansy Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50M
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$25M
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$165MEnvironment$16MArts & Culture$15MScience & Tech$11MEducation$5.1MCommunity Improvement$200kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,500,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$452M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GIVEWELL$25,000,000
PARTNERS IN HEALTH$10,000,007
THE CARTER CENTER$7,000,000
THE HERTZ FOUNDATION$3,500,000
COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL$3,000,009
Individual grant recipient$1,000,000
PRESIDENTS AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE$600,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $15.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $3.0M → 7%COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $2.0M → 10%COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $2.5M → 7%COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $1.3M → 10%COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $2.5M → 7%COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $750k → 10%COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $2.5M → 7%COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $600k → 10%COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $600k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
PA
CA
VA
MD
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$199M · 7 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
3

Total granted

$199M
$345k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+37%

Still filing today

86%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentEducationPhilanthropyHealthInternationalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CLEAR FUND
    5× · 2021–2025 · $72M · revenue +31%
  • PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $47M · revenue +120%
  • TC
    THE CARTER CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $30M · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • IF
    IDEA FOUNDRY
    one grant, 2020 · $200k · revenue -48%
  • LO
    LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +116%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $45k · revenue +37%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
5
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
6
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
7
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
8
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
9
University of Maryland Facultyphysicians Inc

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland, school of medicine, administrative support services are provided to the physician practices of the university of maryland, including but not limited to information technology,…

Health
10
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
11
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
12
University Corporate Research Park I Inc

To hold title and perform related functions in connection with a research park and innovation center in support of michigan state university research foundation.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Minnesota Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CLEAR FUND: $72,100,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CLEAR FUNDPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $47,000,007 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONP…THE CARTER CENTER INC: $29,750,000 · InternationalTHE CARTER CENT…President and Fellows of Harvard College: $11,600,000 · EducationGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $4,500,000 · Education+1 more: $45,000 · EducationNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $15,750,000 · Environment+1 more: $100,000 · EnvironmentCOMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $15,700,009 · Human ServicesTHE HERTZ FOUNDATION: $14,525,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,000,000 · OtherIDEA FOUNDRY: $200,000 · Community Improvement
Philanthropy$72,100,000Health$47,000,007International$29,750,000Education$16,145,000Environment$15,850,000Human Services$15,700,009Other$15,525,000Community Improvement$200,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CLEAR FUND: $72,100,000 over 5y, 7.3% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $47,000,007 over 9y, 4.2% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $29,750,000 over 9y, 4.3% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $15,750,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $15,700,009 over 9y, 8.8% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $11,600,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $4,500,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetIDEA FOUNDRY: $200,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND: $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CLEAR FUND ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds IDEA FOUNDRY ↗
  • Who funds LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tansy Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tansy Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tansy’s filings →

More from the funding graph