Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Tanaka Memorial Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$434k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Education$1.5MArts & Culture$848kScience & Tech$731kInternational$240kRecreation & Sports$70kHuman Services$65kYouth Development$10kSocial Science$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $4k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $180k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $250k
$10,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The John F Kennedy Ctr for Performi$100,000
Pembroke College Oxford$100,000
Georgetown University$50,000
Harvard Kennedy School$20,000
Purchase College Foundation$20,000
The Black Student Fund$10,000
Trinity College$10,000
East Side House Inc$10,000
Carleton College$10,000
Hope College$10,000
The Episcopal School in the City of$10,000
Illinois Wesleyan University$10,000
Hobart William Smith College$10,000
The Hole in the Wall Gang Fund Inc$10,000
McKendree University$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

Your US giving — 74% of grant dollars ($2.5M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 26% that went abroad ($904k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Harvard Kennedy School: $20k → 8%Carleton College: $10k → 11%University of Hawaii Foundatiion: $10k → 9%OIST Foundation: $11k → 9%Hobart William Smith College: $10k → 10%THE UNITED STATES-JAPAN FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%East Side House Inc: $10k → 28%The John F Kennedy Ctr for Performi: $124k → 14%Trinity College: $10k → 11%The Hole in the Wall Gang Fund Inc: $10k → 12%McKendree University: $20k → 16%Bates College: $10k → 13%Harvard Kennedy School: $20k → 8%Carleton College: $10k → 11%University of Hawaii Foundatiion: $10k → 9%OIST Foundation: $10k → 9%Hobart William Smith College: $10k → 10%THE UNITED STATES-JAPAN FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%East Side House Inc: $10k → 28%The Black Student Fund: $10k → 14%Trinity College: $10k → 11%The Hole in the Wall Gang Fund Inc: $10k → 12%McKendree University: $20k → 16%Harvard Kennedy School: $20k → 8%The John F Kennedy Ctr for Performi: $110k → 14%Purchase College Foundation: $20k → 9%The John F Kennedy Ctr for Performi: $100k → 14%Purchase College Foundation: $20k → 9%Purchase College Foundation: $20k → 9%The John F Kennedy Ctr for Performi: $100k → 14%Purchase College Foundation: $20k → 9%Purchase College Foundation: $20k → 9%The John F Kennedy Ctr for Performi: $100k → 14%Purchase College Foundation: $20k → 9%Purchase College Foundation: $20k → 9%The John F Kennedy Ctr for Performi: $100k → 14%The Midori Foundation: $20k → 17%The John F Kennedy Ctr for Performi: $100k → 14%The Kennedy Center: $30k → 14%The Chapin School: $30k → 17%Georgetown University: $50k → 14%The Chapin School: $15k → 17%Georgetown University: $50k → 14%The Chapin School: $15k → 17%Georgetown University: $50k → 14%Georgetown University: $50k → 14%Georgetown University: $50k → 14%Georgetown University: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
CT
DC
HI

Beyond the US — 26% of all-years giving ($904k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$804k · 9 grants
Japan$100k · 2 grants

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 38% of Tanaka Memorial Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 17% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 14% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Tanaka Memorial Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 55% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.2M · 22 repeat orgs$135k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
3

Total granted

$3.2M
$131k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+42%

Still filing today

68%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2019–2025 · $300k · revenue +35%
  • HC
    HOPE COLLEGE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $190k · revenue +25%
  • MU
    McKendree University
    7× · 2019–2025 · $90k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • TD
    The Duke of Edinburgh's Internatiio
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • TK
    The Kennedy Center
    one grant, 2019 · $30k
  • JI
    JAPAN ICU FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +42%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
5
Hillsdale College

Hillsdale college is a private liberal arts college with approximately 1,500 students. founded in 1844, the college remains, in the words of its articles of association, "grateful to god for the inestimable blessings resulting from the…

Education
6
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
7
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

9
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
11
The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science & Art

See schedule ovision: the cooper union for the advancement of science and art is dedicated to peter cooper's radical commitment to diversity and his founding vision that fair access to an inspiring free education and forums for courageous…

Education
12
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Illinois Wesleyan University and the most unlike its peers is United States - Japan Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

The John F Kennedy Ctr for Performi — $733,600 · OtherThe John F Kennedy Ctr for PerformiPembroke College Oxford — $700,000 · OtherPembroke College OxfordThe Duke of Edinburgh's Internatiio — $100,000 · OtherTanaka Ikueikai Educational Foundat — $100,000 · OtherTHE MIDORI FOUNDATION INC — $80,000 · OtherBLACK STUDENT FUND — $70,000 · OtherJohns Hopkins University SAIS — $70,000 · OtherThe Episcopal School in the City of — $70,000 · OtherHobart William Smith College — $70,000 · Other+4 more — $106,000 · OtherGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $300,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITYHOPE COLLEGE — $190,000 · EducationHOPE COLLEGEPURCHASE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $140,000 · EducationPURCHASE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCMcKendree University — $90,000 · EducationMcKendree UniversityTHE CHAPIN SCHOOL LTD — $70,000 · EducationTHE CHAPIN SCHOOL LTDILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $70,000 · EducationILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION — $70,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATIONTRINITY COLLEGE — $70,000 · EducationTRINITY COLLEGEPRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE — $70,000 · EducationPRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGECARLETON COLLEGE — $70,000 · EducationCARLETON COLLEGEPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $60,000 · EducationHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC — $70,000 · Recreation & SportsEAST SIDE HOUSE INC — $65,000 · Recreation & SportsJAPAN ICU FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$2,099,600Education$1,200,000Recreation & Sports$135,000Philanthropy$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $300,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE COLLEGE — $190,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPURCHASE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $140,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetMcKendree University — $90,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MIDORI FOUNDATION INC — $80,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetTHE CHAPIN SCHOOL LTD — $70,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBLACK STUDENT FUND — $70,000 over 7y, 4.6% of budgetILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION — $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC — $70,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTRINITY COLLEGE — $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE — $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCARLETON COLLEGE — $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEAST SIDE HOUSE INC — $65,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES - JAPAN FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetJAPAN ICU FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds HOPE COLLEGE
  • Who funds PURCHASE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds McKendree University
  • Who funds THE MIDORI FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE CHAPIN SCHOOL LTD
  • Who funds BLACK STUDENT FUND
  • Who funds ILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC
  • Who funds TRINITY COLLEGE
  • Who funds PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE
  • Who funds CARLETON COLLEGE
  • Who funds EAST SIDE HOUSE INC
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College
  • Who funds UNITED STATES - JAPAN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds JAPAN ICU FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Tanaka Memorial Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College7% of income from government
  • Trinity College0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Tanaka Memorial Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Tanaka Memorial Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph