Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Tall Oak Midstream Foundation

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$130k
Granted FY2017
16
Grants FY2017
5
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2017 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k11 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $84k
$6,375
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY$20,088
YOUR GRATEFUL NATION$20,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OKLAHOMA$15,000
ALLIED ARTS$15,000
POSITIVE TOMORROWS$14,125
GVCF$8,250
UCO FOUNDATION$8,000
JOHN ROSS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$6,375
SLATER VALLEY RANCH$5,000
EDMOND MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
BAKER RIPLEY$5,000
SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES$3,000
CENTENNIAL ELEMENTARY$1,750
EDMOND NORTH HIGH SCHOOL$1,500
PROJECT 66$1,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BAKER RIPLEY: $5k → 16%SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 16%PROJECT 66: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sunflower Elementary Pto

Parent teacher organization

Education
2
Rainbow Fleet Inc

To provide innovative educational child care development programs and services that enhance the quality of life for children, their families and child care professionals.

Education
3
Oklahoma City Public Schools Foundation Inc

We are the leading advocate for okcps. we strengthen our schools through community investment, strategic partnerships, and innovative programs.

Education
4
The Verge Entrepreneurship Hub Foundation
Community Improvement
5
It's My Community Initiative Inc

To strengthen communities by building strong, healthy families.

Social Science
6
Pta Oklahoma Congress Dba Council Oak Elementary Pta

To support and enrich council oak elementary school

Education
7
Oklahoma Partnership for School Readiness Foundation Inc

To improve school readiness outcomes in oklahoma.

Education
8
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Oklahoma Inc

Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

Human Services
9
Futuro Brillante
International
10
Fuel Okc Inc

Fuel okc's mission is to increase the number of quality schools serving residents of oklahoma city.

Education
11
Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation
Arts & Culture
12
Greater Opportunities of the Permian Basin Inc

To provide a positive learning experience in a safe and healthy environment that will improve the quality of life for the children, service, and empower them to become self-sufficient, contributing members of the community.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Positive Tomorrows Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mc Everglow Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNITED WAY — $20,088 · OtherUNITED WAYGVCF — $8,250 · OtherGVCFUCO FOUNDATION — $8,000 · OtherUCO FOUNDATIONEDMOND MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL — $5,000 · OtherEDMOND MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOLEDMOND PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $1,500 · Other+1 more — $500 · OtherSPECIAL OPERATORS TRANSITION FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · Public BenefitSPECIAL OPERATORS…POSITIVE TOMORROWS INC — $14,125 · Youth DevelopmentPOSITIVE TOMORRO…MC EVERGLOW FUND INC — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentMC EVERGLOW FUND…ALLIED ARTS OF OKLAHOMA INC — $15,000 · Arts & CultureALLIED ARTS O…JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OKLAHOMA INC — $15,000 · InternationalJUNIOR ACHIEV…BakerRipley — $5,000 · Human ServicesSUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC — $3,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT 66 INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesJOHN ROSS ELEMENTARY PTO — $6,375 · PhilanthropyCENTENNIAL ELEMENTARY PTO INC — $1,750 · Education
Other$43,338Public Benefit$20,000Youth Development$19,125Arts & Culture$15,000International$15,000Human Services$9,000Philanthropy$6,375Education$1,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSPECIAL OPERATORS TRANSITION FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC — $14,125 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetJOHN ROSS ELEMENTARY PTO — $6,375 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetMC EVERGLOW FUND INC — $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetBakerRipley — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT 66 INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Tall Oak Midstream Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 63%
  • Sunbeam Family Services Inc63% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Tall Oak Midstream Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Tall Oak Midstream Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2018) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2017, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph