Skip to content
Taking Cara Babies Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Taking Cara Babies Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$361kHuman Services$251kEducation$151kPublic Safety & Disaster$21kReligion$20kInternational$4kPhilanthropy$3kCrime & Legal$2k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,705
Median grant
1
States reached
$24k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GO FUND ME$1,705
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE SYLAS PROJECT: $5k → 13%LOVE HOUSE KIDS PROGRAM: $20k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
OH
CA
UT
VA
AZ
KS
SC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fsi-Freedom Seekers International

Freedom seekers international is a christian organization that exists to rescue the most severely persecuted for their religious faith in hostile and restrictive countries. through collaborative partnerships we deliver those who are…

Human Services
2
Children to Love International

Children to love is focused on meeting the needs of the suffering children of the world, providing help and assistance to empower 'the least of these'(matthew 25:40). through education, spiritual teaching, economic support, physical…

International
3
Children of Promise International

Children of promise international is a nonprofit organization providing humanitarian aid, relief and development in approximately 7 countries for the purpose of caring for orphans, widows, and destitute children and outreach to the poor…

—
4
Agape Adoption Agency of Arizona Inc

Agape Adoption Agency of Arizona, Inc is a Christian adoption and family service agency with services and programs which promote life, love, and healing.

Human Services
5
Life Matters Worldwide

Life Matters Worldwide encourages, equips and strengthens pregnancy care workers so they can continue to provide life-affirming services.

Civil Rights
6
Hannahs Home

Hannahs Home is a Christ-centered life-affirming maternity home for women who are in crisis.

Human Services
7
Ninos Latinos Unidos Inc

Placement and supervision of at-risk children in certified/foster resource homes and its adoption segment services.

Philanthropy
8
New Day Women's Clinic Inc

New day women's clinic, inc. is a christian organization dedicated to saving the unborn through nurturing and educating expectant mothers and their families and providing real help and healing for those who suffer from the aftermath of…

Health
9
Gabriel Project of the Crossroads

Support for Crisis Pregnancies in Victoria County and Nine surrounding counties. Providing support, counseling, and necessary items during and after the pregnancy.

Human Services
10
New American Community Lending Corporation

New american community lending (nacl) financially empowers refugees, asylum seekers, and other immigrants to promote stability, security, and a share in the american dream.

Human Services
11
Crisis Pregnancy Center of the Treasure Coast

To defend life, to meet physical, social and spiritual needs of those who may be experiencing a crisis pregnancy, to bring healing and wholeness to lives traumatized by abortion, to present the gospel of jesus christ, and to challenge the…

Health
12
Gbnpc Inc

GBNPC exists to proclaim the Gospel of Jesus Christ by compassionately offering Biblical, life-affirming alternatives to people facing unplanned pregnancies and other sexual crises/decisions.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is BABY2BABY; the most unlike its peers is The Sylas Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
2/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MIDAMERICAN NAZARENE UNIVERSITY FOU: $200,000 · OtherMIDAMERICAN NAZARENE UNIVERSITY FOUNORTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $135,000 · OtherNORTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · Other+21 more: $197,847 · Other+21 moreAggieland Pregnancy Outreach Inc: $50,000 · HealthNo One Left Behind: $22,350 · Human ServicesLOVE HOUSE KIDS PROGRAM: $20,000 · Human ServicesThe Sylas Project: $5,000 · Human ServicesGOFUNDMEORG: $1,705 · Philanthropy
Other$712,847Health$50,000Human Services$47,350Philanthropy$1,705

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $135,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAggieland Pregnancy Outreach Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetNo One Left Behind: $22,350 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetECUMENICAL CENTER FOR RELIGION AND HEALT: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE NAZARENE FUND: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLOVE HOUSE KIDS PROGRAM: $20,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetBABY2BABY: $3,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $1,705 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Aggieland Pregnancy Outreach Inc ↗
  • Who funds No One Left Behind ↗
  • Who funds ECUMENICAL CENTER FOR RELIGION AND HEALT ↗
  • Who funds THE NAZARENE FUND ↗
  • Who funds LOVE HOUSE KIDS PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds The Sylas Project ↗
  • Who funds BABY2BABY ↗
  • Who funds GOFUNDMEORG ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
American Online Giving Foundation IncDE5.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Taking Cara Babies Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Taking Cara Babies Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Taking Cara Babies’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home