Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Taking Cara Babies Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Health$361kHuman Services$251kEducation$151kPublic Safety & Disaster$21kReligion$20kInternational$4kPhilanthropy$3kCrime & Legal$2k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,705
Median grant
1
States reached
$24k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GO FUND ME$1,705
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE SYLAS PROJECT: $5k → 13%LOVE HOUSE KIDS PROGRAM: $20k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MI
OH
CA
UT
VA
AZ
KS
SC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fsi-Freedom Seekers International

Freedom seekers international is a christian organization that exists to rescue the most severely persecuted for their religious faith in hostile and restrictive countries. through collaborative partnerships we deliver those who are…

Human Services
2
Children to Love International

Children to love is focused on meeting the needs of the suffering children of the world, providing help and assistance to empower 'the least of these'(matthew 25:40). through education, spiritual teaching, economic support, physical…

International
3
Children of Promise International

Children of promise international is a nonprofit organization providing humanitarian aid, relief and development in approximately 7 countries for the purpose of caring for orphans, widows, and destitute children and outreach to the poor…

4
Agape Adoption Agency of Arizona Inc

Agape Adoption Agency of Arizona, Inc is a Christian adoption and family service agency with services and programs which promote life, love, and healing.

Human Services
5
Life Matters Worldwide

Life Matters Worldwide encourages, equips and strengthens pregnancy care workers so they can continue to provide life-affirming services.

Civil Rights
6
Hannahs Home

Hannahs Home is a Christ-centered life-affirming maternity home for women who are in crisis.

Human Services
7
Ninos Latinos Unidos Inc

Placement and supervision of at-risk children in certified/foster resource homes and its adoption segment services.

Philanthropy
8
New Day Women's Clinic Inc

New day women's clinic, inc. is a christian organization dedicated to saving the unborn through nurturing and educating expectant mothers and their families and providing real help and healing for those who suffer from the aftermath of…

Health
9
Gabriel Project of the Crossroads

Support for Crisis Pregnancies in Victoria County and Nine surrounding counties. Providing support, counseling, and necessary items during and after the pregnancy.

Human Services
10
New American Community Lending Corporation

New american community lending (nacl) financially empowers refugees, asylum seekers, and other immigrants to promote stability, security, and a share in the american dream.

Human Services
11
Crisis Pregnancy Center of the Treasure Coast

To defend life, to meet physical, social and spiritual needs of those who may be experiencing a crisis pregnancy, to bring healing and wholeness to lives traumatized by abortion, to present the gospel of jesus christ, and to challenge the…

Health
12
Gbnpc Inc

GBNPC exists to proclaim the Gospel of Jesus Christ by compassionately offering Biblical, life-affirming alternatives to people facing unplanned pregnancies and other sexual crises/decisions.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is BABY2BABY and the most unlike its peers is The Sylas Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
2/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MIDAMERICAN NAZARENE UNIVERSITY FOU — $200,000 · OtherMIDAMERICAN NAZARENE UNIVERSITY FOUNORTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $135,000 · OtherNORTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient — $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $30,000 · Other+21 more — $197,847 · Other+21 moreAggieland Pregnancy Outreach Inc — $50,000 · HealthNo One Left Behind — $22,350 · Human ServicesLOVE HOUSE KIDS PROGRAM — $20,000 · Human ServicesThe Sylas Project — $5,000 · Human ServicesGOFUNDMEORG — $1,705 · Philanthropy
Other$712,847Health$50,000Human Services$47,350Philanthropy$1,705

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNORTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $135,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAggieland Pregnancy Outreach Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetNo One Left Behind — $22,350 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetECUMENICAL CENTER FOR RELIGION AND HEALT — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE NAZARENE FUND — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLOVE HOUSE KIDS PROGRAM — $20,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetBABY2BABY — $3,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG — $1,705 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
  • Who funds Aggieland Pregnancy Outreach Inc
  • Who funds No One Left Behind
  • Who funds ECUMENICAL CENTER FOR RELIGION AND HEALT
  • Who funds THE NAZARENE FUND
  • Who funds LOVE HOUSE KIDS PROGRAM
  • Who funds The Sylas Project
  • Who funds BABY2BABY
  • Who funds GOFUNDMEORG

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE5.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Taking Cara Babies Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph