Skip to content

· Private foundation

T Ulatowski Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$95k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$812kArts & Culture$337kInternational$100kSocial Science$45kReligion$30kHealth$10kHuman Services$5k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION$50,000
MEDIA LIBERATION FUND$25,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF POLIN MUSEUM$10,000
ST JOHN'S COLLEGE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MENDOCINO COAST CHILDREN'S FUND: $5k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$889k · 7 repeat orgs$350k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
9

Total granted

$889k
$275k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-31%
-24%

Still filing today

57%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PF
    Partnership for Haas Preeminence
    2× · 2017–2018 · $250k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY
    2× · 2019–2020 · $230k
  • NA
    NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL OF THE MUSEUM OF THE HISTORY OF POLISH JEWS
    3× · 2017–2020 · $176k

Funded once

  • HS
    HAAS SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
    one grant, 2017 · $90k
  • LM
    LIBERATION MEDIA FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • UB
    UC BERKLEY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Marin Academy

Marin academy asks every individual to think, question, and create in an environment of encouragement and compassion, and challenges each person to accept the responsibilities posed by education in a democratic society.

Education
2
President and Fellows of Middlebury College

Through a commitment to immersive learning, we prepare students to lead engaged, consequential, and creative lives, contribute to their communities, and address the world's most challenging problems.

Education
3
Mendocino College Foundation Inc

The foundation supports mendocino college in educating leaders, fostering intellectual growth and enriching lives by creating opportunities to invest in a better future for our students and communities.

Education
4
Harvey Mudd College

HMC seeks to educate engineers, scientists, and mathematicians well versed in all of these areas and in the humanities, social sciences and the arts so that they may assume leadership in their fields with a clear understanding of the…

Education
5
Pitzer College

Pitzer College produces engaged socially responsible citizens of the world through an academically rigorous, interdisciplinary liberal arts education emphasizing social justice, intercultural understanding and environmental sensitivity.…

Education
6
Menlo College

Menlo college was founded in 1927 as a component of menlo school and college. on july 1, 1994, the college commenced operations as a separate, non-profit, coeducational institution of higher education. (continued on schedule o)the…

—
7
Mills College

Mills college is an independent liberal arts college for women and gender nonbinary students, with graduate programs for all genders. the college educates students to think critically and communicate responsibly and effectively, to accept…

—
8
The College Preparatory School

At college prep we believe in the foundational importance of scholarship, the value of dialogue, and the need for academically curious young people to belong to a kind, creative, diverse and joyful community. we challenge our students to…

Education
9
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
10
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
11
Menlo School

Menlo school's mission is to empower students to explore and expand their interests, reach their fullest potential, develop the skills necessary for success in college, and become ethical, responsible, and engaged members of ever wider…

—
12
Minnesota Private College Fund

The minnesota private college fund serves the shared needs of its members by seeking philanthropic support from corporations, foundations, and others for the benefit of its member colleges and universities and the students they educate.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rocky Mountain Planned Parenthood Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Friends of Polin Museum of the History of Polish Jews Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Partnership for Haas Preeminence: $250,000 · OtherPartnership for Haas PreeminenceUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY: $230,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEYNORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL OF THE MUSEUM OF THE HISTORY OF POLISH JEWS: $175,500 · OtherNORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL OF THE MUSEUM OF THE HISTORY OF POLISH JEWSHAAS SCHOOL OF BUSINESS: $90,000 · OtherHAAS SCHOOL OF BUSINESSLIBERATION MEDIA FUND: $50,000 · OtherUC BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherUC BERKLEY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Other+5 more: $97,000 · Other+5 moreST JOHN'S COLLEGE: $60,000 · EducationST JOHN'S …Mendocino Unified Schools Enrichment Inc: $50,250 · EducationMendocino …COLORADO ROCKY MOUNTAIN SCHOOL INC: $10,000 · EducationCOLORADO R…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF POLIN MUSEUM OF THE HISTORY OF POLISH JEWS INC: $111,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN …MYRIAD USA INC: $100,000 · InternationalROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $10,000 · HealthMENDOCINO COAST CHILDRENS FUND: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$992,500Education$120,250Arts & Culture$111,000International$100,000Health$10,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPartnership for Haas Preeminence: $250,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF POLIN MUSEUM OF THE HISTORY OF POLISH JEWS INC: $111,000 over 5y, 5.8% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST JOHN'S COLLEGE: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMendocino Unified Schools Enrichment Inc: $50,250 over 4y, 21% of budgetPartnership Scholars Program: $12,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO ROCKY MOUNTAIN SCHOOL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMENDOCINO COAST CHILDRENS FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Partnership for Haas Preeminence ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF POLIN MUSEUM OF THE HISTORY OF POLISH JEWS INC ↗
  • Who funds MYRIAD USA INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHN'S COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Mendocino Unified Schools Enrichment Inc ↗
  • Who funds Partnership Scholars Program ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO ROCKY MOUNTAIN SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds MENDOCINO COAST CHILDRENS FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN9.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization T Ulatowski Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from T Ulatowski Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • St John's College: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to T Ulatowski Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to T Ulatowski Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on T Ulatowski Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph