Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sze and Chiuyee Ho Family Foundation

TO PROVIDE AWARENESS AND SUPPORT OF NASAL PHARYNGEAL CARCINOMA.

$47k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$216kCivil Rights$103kHuman Services$8kInternational$4kCommunity Improvement$3kHealth$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $42k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Ethnos$20,000
Solana Beach Presbyterian Church$11,500
Campus Crusade$10,000
Intervarsity Christian Fellowship$5,000
Compassion International$450
Solana Beach Community Center$110
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Boston China Town Neighborhood Cent: $8k → 16%Elizabeth Hospice: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
MA
OR
NJ
CA
CO
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$337k · 12 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
12

Total granted

$337k
$66k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+12%

Still filing today

17%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • E
    Ethnos
    5× · 2020–2025 · $103k
  • SB
    SOLANA BEACH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    5× · 2021–2025 · $61k
  • C
    CRU
    2× · 2020–2021 · $56k

Funded once

  • RC
    Redeemer City To City
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
  • CC
    Confucius Church of Bakersfield
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • BOSTON CHINATOWN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue +12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Tyndale Bible Translators

Bible Translation and acts of Christian Services

Religion
3
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
4
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
5
Next Worldwide Inc

With a desire to see the Gospel proclaimed in all nations, we exist to make and multiply disciples of the next generation through the vehicles of church-planting missions and missional leadership training.

—
6
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
7
Biblical Education By Extension Inc

To assist the church, primarily in closed countries, in the establishment of continuing indigenous church-based training centers in which servant leaders are equipped to develop growing and reproducing churches.

Religion
8
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
9
Crossing Cultures International Inc

Crossing Cultures International, Inc. exists to glorify God by equipping Christ followers globally with comprehensive training for effective ministry.

Religion
10
Institute of Chinese Studies

ChinsSource is a trusted partner and platform for educating the global church on critical issues facing the church and ministries in China and for connecting Christians inside and outside China to advance the kingdom of God globally

International
11
Faith Baptist Bible College

Post secondary and graduate educational institution The mission of Faith Baptist Bible College and Theological Seminary is to equip vocational Christian workers and other servant leaders while inspiring them to take the Word to the world.

Education
12
Center of Theological Inquiry

The Center of Theological Inquiry is an independent research institution with an international visiting scholar program which convenes researchers in an ideal setting for interdisciplinary inquiries where theology casts light on global…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA; the most unlike its peers is Fullness in Christ Fellowship. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Ethnos: $103,055 · OtherEthnosSOLANA BEACH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $60,604 · OtherSOLANA BEACH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHCRU: $56,000 · OtherCRUCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC: $45,000 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC+11 more: $40,610 · Other+11 moreFullness in Christ Fellowship: $26,000 · ReligionFullness in Christ Fell…Redeemer City To City: $25,000 · ReligionRedeemer City To CityBIBLEPROJECT: $20,000 · ReligionBIBLEPROJECTInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA: $12,000 · ReligionInterVarsity Christian …+1 more: $1,100 · ReligionBOSTON CHINATOWN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesTHE ELIZABETH HOSPICE INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesCompassion International Incorporated: $1,961 · InternationalDallas Theological Seminary: $1,000 · Education
Other$305,269Religion$84,100Human Services$10,000International$1,961Education$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFullness in Christ Fellowship: $26,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetRedeemer City To City: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIBLEPROJECT: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA: $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON CHINATOWN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ELIZABETH HOSPICE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Bible Study: $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDallas Theological Seminary: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Fullness in Christ Fellowship ↗
  • Who funds Redeemer City To City ↗
  • Who funds BIBLEPROJECT ↗
  • Who funds InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON CHINATOWN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ELIZABETH HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds Community Bible Study ↗
  • Who funds Dallas Theological Seminary ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sze and Chiuyee Ho Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sze and Chiuyee Ho Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 38%
  • Boston Chinatown Neighborhood Center Inc: 38% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sze and Chiuyee Ho Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph