Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Sze and Chiuyee Ho Family Foundation

TO PROVIDE AWARENESS AND SUPPORT OF NASAL PHARYNGEAL CARCINOMA.

$47k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Religion$216kCivil Rights$103kHuman Services$8kInternational$4kCommunity Improvement$3kHealth$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $42k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Ethnos$20,000
Solana Beach Presbyterian Church$11,500
Campus Crusade$10,000
Intervarsity Christian Fellowship$5,000
Compassion International$450
Solana Beach Community Center$110
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Boston China Town Neighborhood Cent: $8k → 16%Elizabeth Hospice: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WI
NY
MA
OR
NJ
CA
CO
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$337k · 12 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
12

Total granted

$337k
$66k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+12%

Still filing today

17%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesInternationalEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • E
    Ethnos
    5× · 2020–2025 · $103k
  • SB
    SOLANA BEACH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    5× · 2021–2025 · $61k
  • C
    CRU
    2× · 2020–2021 · $56k

Funded once

  • RC
    Redeemer City To City
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
  • CC
    Confucius Church of Bakersfield
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • BOSTON CHINATOWN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue +12%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Tyndale Bible Translators

Bible Translation and acts of Christian Services

Religion
3
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
4
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
5
Next Worldwide Inc

With a desire to see the Gospel proclaimed in all nations, we exist to make and multiply disciples of the next generation through the vehicles of church-planting missions and missional leadership training.

6
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
7
Biblical Education By Extension Inc

To assist the church, primarily in closed countries, in the establishment of continuing indigenous church-based training centers in which servant leaders are equipped to develop growing and reproducing churches.

Religion
8
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
9
Crossing Cultures International Inc

Crossing Cultures International, Inc. exists to glorify God by equipping Christ followers globally with comprehensive training for effective ministry.

Religion
10
Institute of Chinese Studies

ChinsSource is a trusted partner and platform for educating the global church on critical issues facing the church and ministries in China and for connecting Christians inside and outside China to advance the kingdom of God globally

International
11
Faith Baptist Bible College

Post secondary and graduate educational institution The mission of Faith Baptist Bible College and Theological Seminary is to equip vocational Christian workers and other servant leaders while inspiring them to take the Word to the world.

Education
12
Center of Theological Inquiry

The Center of Theological Inquiry is an independent research institution with an international visiting scholar program which convenes researchers in an ideal setting for interdisciplinary inquiries where theology casts light on global…

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA and the most unlike its peers is Fullness in Christ Fellowship. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Ethnos — $103,055 · OtherEthnosSOLANA BEACH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $60,604 · OtherSOLANA BEACH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHCRU — $56,000 · OtherCRUCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC — $45,000 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC+11 more — $40,610 · Other+11 moreFullness in Christ Fellowship — $26,000 · ReligionFullness in Christ Fell…Redeemer City To City — $25,000 · ReligionRedeemer City To CityBIBLEPROJECT — $20,000 · ReligionBIBLEPROJECTInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA — $12,000 · ReligionInterVarsity Christian …+1 more — $1,100 · ReligionBOSTON CHINATOWN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC — $7,500 · Human ServicesTHE ELIZABETH HOSPICE INC — $2,500 · Human ServicesCompassion International Incorporated — $1,961 · InternationalDallas Theological Seminary — $1,000 · Education
Other$305,269Religion$84,100Human Services$10,000International$1,961Education$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFullness in Christ Fellowship — $26,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetRedeemer City To City — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIBLEPROJECT — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA — $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON CHINATOWN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ELIZABETH HOSPICE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Bible Study — $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDallas Theological Seminary — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Fullness in Christ Fellowship
  • Who funds Redeemer City To City
  • Who funds BIBLEPROJECT
  • Who funds InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA
  • Who funds BOSTON CHINATOWN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC
  • Who funds THE ELIZABETH HOSPICE INC
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated
  • Who funds Community Bible Study
  • Who funds Dallas Theological Seminary

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sze and Chiuyee Ho Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 38%
  • Boston Chinatown Neighborhood Center Inc38% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph