Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Swifty Foundation

The Swifty Foundation exists to support research aimed at understanding the causes of pediatric cancer and finding a cure.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$533k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$5.6M
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k5 grants · $622k
  • $250k+1 grant · $533k
$160,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Foundation$533,235
Weill Cornell Medicine$215,000
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago$160,000
Children's Hospital Foundation$137,384
Seattle Children's Foundation$60,000
Lucille Packard Foundation for Children's Health$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Alex's Lemonade Stand Foundation: $100k → 7%Children's Hospital of Philadelphia: $750k → 22%Lucille Packard Foundation for Children's Health: $300k → 8%Solving Kids Cancer: $250k → 17%Children's Hospital Foundation: $404k → 14%Orlando Health Foundation Inc: $48k → 13%Arms Wide Open Foundation: $8k → 7%Lurie Children's Hospital Foundation: $300k → 14%Alex's Lemonade Stand Foundation: $50k → 11%Prep4Gold: $25k → 6%Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Foundation: $533k → 22%Lucile Packard Foundation for Children's Health: $300k → 8%Weill Cornell Medicine: $215k → 17%Children's Hospital Foundation: $137k → 14%Lurie Children Fund: $300k → 14%Alex's Lemonade Stand Foundation: $30k → 11%Children's Hospital of Philadelphia: $333k → 22%Lucille Packard Foundation for Children's Health: $50k → 8%Weill Cornell Imaging at New York-Presbyterian: $90k → 17%Kids vs Cancer: $25k → 14%Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago: $160k → 14%Children's Hospital of Philadelphia: $260k → 22%Kids vs Cancer: $10k → 14%Children's Hospital of Philadelphia: $250k → 22%Children's Hospital of Philadelphia: $160k → 22%Children's Hospital of Philadelphia: $85k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
NY
PA
CT
CA
VA
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 5% of Swifty Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Swifty Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.6M · 6 repeat orgs$981k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +60% since the first grant, against +0% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
9

Total granted

$4.6M
$766k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+0%

Still filing today

100%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $215k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +180%
  • Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
    3× · 2017–2024 · $760k · revenue +60%
  • LP
    LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH
    3× · 2018–2024 · $650k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • TC
    Texas Children's Hospital
    one grant, 2023 · $300k · revenue +0%
  • SK
    SOLVING KIDS' CANCER INC
    one grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue -61% · 29% of their budget
  • WC
    WEILL CORNELL IMAGING AT NEWYORK-PRESBYTERIAN
    one grant, 2023 · $90k · revenue +19%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
2
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
3
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
4
Beth Israel Hospital & Children's Hospital Medical Care Corporation

Pediatric healthcare, education & research

5
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
6
Children's Research Institute

Children's research institute dba children's national research institute conducts and promotes translational and clinical medical research and education programs that lead to improved understanding, prevention, treatment, and care of…

Health
7
Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital Inc

Mission: johns hopkins all children's hospital (all children's), a member of johns hopkins medicine, strives to provide the highest quality care to improve the health of our entire community through innovation, collaboration, service…

Health
8
East Tennessee Children's Hospital Association Inc

East tennessee children's hospital is a free-standing, independent, not-for-profit pediatric health care system which serves the east tennessee region. children's hospital is certified by the state of tennessee as a comprehensive regional…

Health
9
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
10
Stanley Manne Childrens Research Institute

Stanley manne children's research institute strives to generate new knowledge and advance the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of pediatric diseases.

Health
11
Children's Hospital of Chicago Medical Center

We are dedicated to the health and well-being of all children. as the pediatric teaching facility for the northwestern university feinberg school of medicine, this commitment drives us to be a leader in: -pediatric health care delivery…

Health
12
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Kids V Cancer. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION — $2,371,128 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATIONAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago — $760,000 · HealthAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of ChicagoLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH — $650,000 · HealthLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTHCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $541,798 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONTexas Children's Hospital — $300,000 · HealthTexas Children's HospitalSOLVING KIDS' CANCER INC — $250,000 · Health+6 more — $290,500 · Health+6 moreWeill Medical College of Cornell Univers — $215,000 · OtherALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION — $180,000 · OtherKids vs Cancer — $25,000 · OtherSociety for Neuro-Oncology — $10,800 · Arts & Culture
Health$5,163,426Other$420,000Arts & Culture$10,800

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION — $2,371,128 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago — $760,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH — $650,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $541,798 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital — $300,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOLVING KIDS' CANCER INC — $250,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION — $180,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $110,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWEILL CORNELL IMAGING AT NEWYORK-PRESBYTERIAN — $90,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOrlando Health Foundation Inc — $48,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPREP4GOLD — $25,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetSociety for Neuro-Oncology — $10,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKids V Cancer — $10,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetARMS WIDE OPEN CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Swifty Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Swifty Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Swifty Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph