Skip to content

· Private foundation

Swedish Aid Society

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$31k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$143kReligion$11kHealth$8kRecreation & Sports$6kHousing & Shelter$3k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Connecticut Foodshare$6,600
WHEAT$3,000
Masters Manna$3,000
Food Pantry of North Branford$3,000
Branford Food Pantry$3,000
Community Dining Room$3,000
Saint Paul IV Parish$3,000
Newreach$3,000
Bethesda Luteran Church$1,200
Tabor Lutheran Church$1,200
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%Food Pantry of North Branford: $3k → 12%Food Pantry of North Branford: $3k → 12%Food Panty of North Branford: $3k → 12%Food Pantry of North Branford: $3k → 12%Food Pantry of North Branford: $3k → 12%Food Pantry of North Branford: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$143k · 11 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
9

Total granted

$143k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+213%

Still filing today

64%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $33k · revenue +97%
  • MM
    Master's Manna Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $16k · revenue +19%
  • CD
    COMMUNITY DINING ROOM INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $16k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • SA
    St Ann Soup Kitchen
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • CT
    Christ the Bread of Life Church
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • SA
    St Ann's Soup Kitchen
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Farmington Food Pantry Inc

To provide a respectful, empowering environment, where supplemental food and personal care items are available to individuals who need assistance in farmington, ct.

Food & Nutrition
2
Community Food Bank

To fight hunger and poverty by providing food, education, programs and resources to families in a dignified, personal and expeditious manner directly as a food pantry and as a food bank; without zip code restrictions.

Food & Nutrition
3
New London Area Food Pantry

Serving the residents of New London and Southeastern CT by offering a selection of groceries to those who cannot afford to meet their nutritional needs otherwise.

Human Services
4
Community Food Pantry

The organizations mission is to distribute food toiletries detergent and other basic necessities to individuals and families.

Food & Nutrition
5
Croton-Cortlandt Food Pantry

Croton Cortlandt Food Pantry's primary mission is to provide food assistance to families and individuals who are food insecure and have difficulty meeting their basic nutritional needs on their own. The pantry also provides diapers and…

Food & Nutrition
6
Emergency Food Aid in Southbury

Providing food assistance to Southbury residents demonstrating need.

—
7
Daily Bread an Ecumenical Food Pantry Inc

Operate a non-sectarian food pantry for needy families in the greater danbury area. food is given out to these families free of charge.

Food & Nutrition
8
Wilton Food Pantry

To provide those in need with emergency food by working together with community members, leaders, and local businesses and organizations to gather, store, and distribute goods; to offer compassionate help as we respect the dignity of each…

Food & Nutrition
9
Feed Ri

To provide food to organizations that feed the poor, distressed and the underprivileged.

Food & Nutrition
10
Camden Area Christian Food Pantry

Provide food and basic necessities to individuals and families in need in the Camden, Maine area

Food & Nutrition
11
Hempfield Area Food Pantry Inc

Provide hunger relief to individuals and families who are unable to afford food and receive inadequate government financial assistance

Food & Nutrition
12
North Kingstown Food Pantry Inc

To provide emergency food assistance and services to individuals and families in North Kingstown to help with short-term need and insure an adequate, healthy diet for our clients.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connecticut Foodshare Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC: $33,350 · OtherCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INCWHEAT INC: $16,400 · OtherWHEAT INCCOMMUNITY DINING ROOM INC: $16,400 · OtherCOMMUNITY DINING ROOM INCBRANFORD FOOD PANTRY: $16,400 · OtherBRANFORD FOOD PANTRYTabor Lutheran Church: $6,950 · OtherTabor Lutheran ChurchFISH of New Haven: $5,900 · OtherFISH: $5,150 · OtherBethesda Lutheran Church: $4,550 · Other+11 more: $23,950 · Other+11 moreMaster's Manna Inc: $16,400 · Food & NutritionMaster's M…Food Pantry of North Branford Inc: $16,400 · Human ServicesFood Pantr…CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthNEW REACH INC: $3,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$129,050Food & Nutrition$16,400Human Services$16,400Health$5,000Housing & Shelter$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC: $33,350 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMaster's Manna Inc: $16,400 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetWHEAT INC: $16,400 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY DINING ROOM INC: $16,400 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetFood Pantry of North Branford Inc: $16,400 over 6y, 4.4% of budgetBRANFORD FOOD PANTRY: $16,400 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEW REACH INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds Master's Manna Inc ↗
  • Who funds WHEAT INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY DINING ROOM INC ↗
  • Who funds Food Pantry of North Branford Inc ↗
  • Who funds BRANFORD FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW REACH INC ↗
  • Who funds FISH OF GREATER NEW HAVEN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Connecticut Foodshare IncCT13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Connecticut Foodshare Inc · Newalliance Foundation Inc · Liberty Bank Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater New Haven · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Swedish Aid Society funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Swedish Aid Society. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • New Reach Inc: 49% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Wheat Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Swedish Aid Society?

Find your warmest path to Swedish Aid Society through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Swedish Aid Society’s filings →

More from the funding graph