Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Swedish Aid Society

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$31k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Food & Nutrition$143kReligion$11kHealth$8kRecreation & Sports$6kHousing & Shelter$3k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Connecticut Foodshare$6,600
Food Pantry of North Branford$3,000
Branford Food Pantry$3,000
Community Dining Room$3,000
Saint Paul IV Parish$3,000
Newreach$3,000
WHEAT$3,000
Masters Manna$3,000
Bethesda Luteran Church$1,200
Tabor Lutheran Church$1,200
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%Food Pantry of North Branford: $3k → 12%Food Pantry of North Branford: $3k → 12%Food Panty of North Branford: $3k → 12%Food Pantry of North Branford: $3k → 12%Food Pantry of North Branford: $3k → 12%Food Pantry of North Branford: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$143k · 11 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
9

Total granted

$143k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+213%

Still filing today

64%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $33k · revenue +97%
  • MM
    Master's Manna Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $16k · revenue +19%
  • CD
    COMMUNITY DINING ROOM INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $16k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • SA
    St Ann Soup Kitchen
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • CT
    Christ the Bread of Life Church
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • SA
    St Ann's Soup Kitchen
    one grant, 2022 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Farmington Food Pantry Inc

To provide a respectful, empowering environment, where supplemental food and personal care items are available to individuals who need assistance in farmington, ct.

Food & Nutrition
2
Community Food Bank

To fight hunger and poverty by providing food, education, programs and resources to families in a dignified, personal and expeditious manner directly as a food pantry and as a food bank; without zip code restrictions.

Food & Nutrition
3
New London Area Food Pantry

Serving the residents of New London and Southeastern CT by offering a selection of groceries to those who cannot afford to meet their nutritional needs otherwise.

Human Services
4
Community Food Pantry

The organizations mission is to distribute food toiletries detergent and other basic necessities to individuals and families.

Food & Nutrition
5
Croton-Cortlandt Food Pantry

Croton Cortlandt Food Pantry's primary mission is to provide food assistance to families and individuals who are food insecure and have difficulty meeting their basic nutritional needs on their own. The pantry also provides diapers and…

Food & Nutrition
6
Emergency Food Aid in Southbury

Providing food assistance to Southbury residents demonstrating need.

7
Daily Bread an Ecumenical Food Pantry Inc

Operate a non-sectarian food pantry for needy families in the greater danbury area. food is given out to these families free of charge.

Food & Nutrition
8
Wilton Food Pantry

To provide those in need with emergency food by working together with community members, leaders, and local businesses and organizations to gather, store, and distribute goods; to offer compassionate help as we respect the dignity of each…

Food & Nutrition
9
Feed Ri

To provide food to organizations that feed the poor, distressed and the underprivileged.

Food & Nutrition
10
Camden Area Christian Food Pantry

Provide food and basic necessities to individuals and families in need in the Camden, Maine area

Food & Nutrition
11
Hempfield Area Food Pantry Inc

Provide hunger relief to individuals and families who are unable to afford food and receive inadequate government financial assistance

Food & Nutrition
12
North Kingstown Food Pantry Inc

To provide emergency food assistance and services to individuals and families in North Kingstown to help with short-term need and insure an adequate, healthy diet for our clients.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connecticut Foodshare Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC — $33,350 · OtherCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INCWHEAT INC — $16,400 · OtherWHEAT INCCOMMUNITY DINING ROOM INC — $16,400 · OtherCOMMUNITY DINING ROOM INCBRANFORD FOOD PANTRY — $16,400 · OtherBRANFORD FOOD PANTRYTabor Lutheran Church — $6,950 · OtherTabor Lutheran ChurchFISH of New Haven — $5,900 · OtherFISH — $5,150 · OtherBethesda Lutheran Church — $4,550 · Other+11 more — $23,950 · Other+11 moreMaster's Manna Inc — $16,400 · Food & NutritionMaster's M…Food Pantry of North Branford Inc — $16,400 · Human ServicesFood Pantr…CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $5,000 · HealthNEW REACH INC — $3,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$129,050Food & Nutrition$16,400Human Services$16,400Health$5,000Housing & Shelter$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC — $33,350 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMaster's Manna Inc — $16,400 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetWHEAT INC — $16,400 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY DINING ROOM INC — $16,400 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetFood Pantry of North Branford Inc — $16,400 over 6y, 4.4% of budgetBRANFORD FOOD PANTRY — $16,400 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEW REACH INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC
  • Who funds Master's Manna Inc
  • Who funds WHEAT INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY DINING ROOM INC
  • Who funds Food Pantry of North Branford Inc
  • Who funds BRANFORD FOOD PANTRY
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds NEW REACH INC
  • Who funds FISH OF GREATER NEW HAVEN INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Connecticut Foodshare IncCT13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Connecticut Foodshare Inc · Newalliance Foundation Inc · Liberty Bank Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater New Haven · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Swedish Aid Society funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • New Reach Inc49% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc5% of income from government
  • Wheat Inc3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Swedish Aid Society?

Find your warmest path to Swedish Aid Society through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph