Skip to content

· Private foundation

Swartz Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$735k
Granted FY2022
13
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$279k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

78% of Swartz Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Pef Israel Endowment Funds Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 7 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Swartz Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $735k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

25
’20
21
’21
7
’22
6
’23
7
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

International$15MPhilanthropy$8.6MHealth$3.0MReligion$1.4MFood & Nutrition$724kCommunity Improvement$208kEducation$76kCivil Rights$68kOther$0
02FY2022 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k8 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $153k
  • $250k+2 grants · $529k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$221M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HADASSAH MEDICAL ORGANIZATION$278,507
KESHET DONOR ADVISED FUND$250,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC$103,000
BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC$50,000
HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE$25,000
TEMPLE EMANUEL$7,500
RUTH RALES JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC$5,000
JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDRENS FOUNDATION INC$5,000
CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF THE NORTH SHORE$5,000
BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$2,500
HEBREW SENIORLIFE INC$1,000
DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE INC$1,000
COMBINED JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF GREATER BOSTON INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 82% of grant dollars ($25M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 18% that went abroad ($5.5M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OR NATIONAL MISSIONS: $50k → 17%JCAM CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 8%JCAM CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
MD
DC
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 18% of all-years giving ($5.5M)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Israel$5.5M · 14 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 54% of Swartz Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Swartz Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 18% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14M · 28 repeat orgs$2.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2022, 17 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
12

Total granted

$14M
$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+33%

Still filing today

68%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $539k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureReligionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LATET HUMANITARIAN AID INC
    2× · 2020–2023 · $1.8M · revenue +9% · 40% of their budget
  • BI
    BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $100k · revenue +64%
  • HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE
    2× · 2020–2022 · $28k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • AI
    AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $1.4M · revenue +2%
  • BI
    BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +19%
  • The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
3
University of Judaism Foundation
—
4
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
5
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
6
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
7
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
8
American Friends of Even Yisroel Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
10
The Jerusalem Connection
—
11
American Friends of Kohelet Policy Forum

The principal and primary intent of the organization is to support kohelet policy forum (the "forum"), a jerusalem-based non-profit policy center founded in 2012, comprised of leading academics and researchers.

—
12
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Israel Education Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/37
Grantees still filing
26/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $6,409,640 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INCCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $6,276,000 · PhilanthropyCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston IncAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $721,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $526,000 · Philanthropy+3 more: $43,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAOZ-SEAL INC: $5,209,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAOZ-SEAL IN…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LATET HUMANITARIAN AID INC: $1,830,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LATET HUMANI…AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,450,000 · InternationalAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDA…+6 more: $166,000 · InternationalHADASSAH MEDICAL ORGANIZATION: $2,877,618 · OtherHADASSAH MEDICAL ORGANIZAT…KESHET DONOR ADVISED FUND: $1,806,782 · OtherKESHET DONOR ADVISED FUNDFRIENDS OF ISRAEL DAVID INC: $1,000,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF ISRAEL DAVID IN…Individual grant recipient: $625,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $250,000 · Other+24 more: $567,120 · Other+24 moreBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $100,000 · HealthAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHAMIR (ASSAF HAROFEH) MEDICAL CENTER: $50,000 · Health+2 more: $4,000 · HealthAMERICAN FRIENDS OF OGEN INC: $100,000 · Community ImprovementBoca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc: $7,500 · Community ImprovementCAMP HACHSHARA-MOSHAVA OF NY INC: $100,000 · Recreation & SportsMOISHE HOUSE: $64,273 · ReligionHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $27,500 · Religion
Philanthropy$13,975,640International$8,655,000Other$7,127,020Health$154,000Community Improvement$107,500Recreation & Sports$100,000Religion$91,773

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $6,409,640 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $6,276,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAOZ-SEAL INC: $5,209,000 over 3y, 38% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LATET HUMANITARIAN AID INC: $1,830,000 over 2y, 40% of budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,450,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $721,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $526,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF OGEN INC: $100,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP HACHSHARA-MOSHAVA OF NY INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOISHE HOUSE: $64,273 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHAMIR (ASSAF HAROFEH) MEDICAL CENTER: $50,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetAmerican Friends Of Or National Missions: $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBENEVOLENT FRATERNITY OF UNITARIAN CHURCHES: $50,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $27,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMERIT SPREAD FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $14,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MEIR PANIM: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHebrew Senior Life Inc: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMIDDLE EAST MEDIA AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL OF BROWARD AND PALM BEACH INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetIMPACTISRAEL INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJCAM CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetACTION FOR POST-SOVIET JEWRY INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetThe Conservative Jewish Day School of Dallas Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Israel Philharmonic Orchestra: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BELMONT GOLF SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston IncMA26.8× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Jack Chester Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Swartz Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Swartz Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Hebrew Senior Life Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Swartz Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Swartz Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Swartz’s filings →

More from the funding graph