Skip to content

· Private foundation

Suzanne Smelcer Robinson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Animals$221kEnvironment$26kEducation$21kHealth$19kFood & Nutrition$17kReligion$8kPublic Safety & Disaster$7kYouth Development$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$794k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PAWS CHICAGO$25,000
ILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY$8,000
ANTI-CRUELTY SOCIETY OF ILLINOIS$3,500
NOAH'S ARK FOUNDATION INC$3,500
CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY$2,500
LINCOLN PARK ZOO$2,000
ANN & ROBERT LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$2,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CHICAGO$1,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$1,000
LOVING INDEED$500
HEAVENLY PET SANCTUARY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%LOVING INDEED: $500 → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%LOVING INDEED: $500 → 8%LOVING INDEED: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$357k · 23 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
1

Total granted

$357k
$1k

Still filing today

52%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesFood & NutritionEnvironmentEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PAWS CHICAGO
    7× · 2018–2025 · $175k · revenue +159%
  • CH
    CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY
    7× · 2018–2025 · $17k · revenue +38%
  • IW
    ILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $16k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • JJ
    JDRF JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FDN
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
2
Loving All Animals Inc

To maximize programs intended to stop killing of adoptable animals.

Philanthropy
3
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

—
4
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
5
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
6
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
7
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
8
Chicago Zoological Society

To inspire conservation leadership by connecting people with wildlife and nature.

Animals
9
Friends for Animals of Metro Detroit

The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…

Animals
10
Animal Agriculture Alliance

The animal agriculture alliance is a nonprofit organization that helps bridge the communication gap between farm and fork. we connect food industry stakeholders, engage food chain influencers and promote consumer choice by helping key…

Food & Nutrition
11
Feeding Illinois

Feeding illinois is a coalition of eight feeding america food banks that provide food to over 2,400 food pantries, soup kitchens, and shelters that feed nearly 1.4 million residents across the entire state of illinois.

Food & Nutrition
12
Women's Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc

As america's first animal shelter, founded in 1869, women's humane society dba women's animal center (wac), assists people in the community, saves the lives of animals, and improves the health of pets through its shelter and adoptions…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Chicago Food Depository; the most unlike its peers is Loving Indeed Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PAWS CHICAGO: $175,000 · AnimalsPAWS CHICAGONoahs Ark Foundation Inc: $13,000 · AnimalsNoahs Ark Foundation IncLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $12,000 · AnimalsLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETYIndividual grant recipient: $36,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAnti-Cruelty Society of: $13,500 · OtherAnti-Cruelty Society ofAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's: $9,000 · OtherAnn & Robert H Lurie Children'sCCSNAP: $8,500 · OtherCCSNAPANTI-CRUELTY SOCIETY OF ILLINOIS: $7,000 · OtherANTI-CRUELTY SOCIETY OF ILLINOISCOOL MINISTRIES: $6,000 · OtherCOOL MINISTRIESJuvenile Diabetes: $5,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS: $5,000 · OtherJunior Achievement -: $5,000 · OtherVEAP Inc: $4,000 · OtherANN & ROBERT LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $4,000 · Other+3 more: $3,000 · OtherCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $17,000 · EnvironmentILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $16,000 · EducationGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $10,000 · Food & NutritionTHURSTON COUNTY FOOD BANK: $1,500 · Food & NutritionFIRST LOVE INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES: $2,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,000 · Human ServicesLOVING INDEED INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CHICAGO: $2,000 · International
Animals$200,000Other$106,000Environment$17,000Education$16,000Food & Nutrition$11,500Human Services$5,500International$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPAWS CHICAGO: $175,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $17,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $16,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNoahs Ark Foundation Inc: $13,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $12,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVEAP Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST LOVE INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CHICAGO: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOVING INDEED INC: $1,500 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetTHURSTON COUNTY FOOD BANK: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHeavenly Pet Sanctuary: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PAWS CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Noahs Ark Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds VEAP Inc ↗
  • Who funds FIRST LOVE INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds LOVING INDEED INC ↗
  • Who funds THURSTON COUNTY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Heavenly Pet Sanctuary ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Suzanne Smelcer Robinson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Suzanne Smelcer Robinson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Suzanne Smelcer Robinson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph