Skip to content

Texas · Private foundation

Suzanne Smelcer Robinson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$50k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
11
Grants FY2025
11
Organizations funded FY2024
55%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$2,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$25,000
Organizations funded a year
11 to 16
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
3
Total assets, FY2025
$794k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 55% of the organizations Suzanne Smelcer Robinson Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 33% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving11$50k9%
FY202411$50k55%
FY202311$50k0%
FY202211$48k18%
FY202116$58k0%
FY202016$61k31%
FY201811$42kn/a
94% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Animals$221kEnvironment$26kEducation$21kHealth$19kFood & Nutrition$17kReligion$8kPublic Safety & Disaster$7kYouth Development$2kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 14 grantees
All grantees of Suzanne Smelcer Robinson Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Paws Chicago$175,00070%
Chicago Horticultural Society$17,00070%
Illinois Wesleyan University$16,00020%
Noahs Ark Foundation Inc$13,00041%
Lincoln Park Zoological Society$12,00070%
Greater Chicago Food Depository$10,00020%
VEAP Inc$4,00020%
First Love International Ministries$2,00040%
Junior Achievement of Chicago$2,00020%
American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches$2,00020%
Loving Indeed Inc$1,50031%
Thurston County Food Bank$1,50020%
Lords Cupboard Inc$1,5002n/a
Heavenly Pet Sanctuary$50011%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 11 recipients with no EIN on record ($100k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Suzanne Smelcer Robinson Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPaws Chicago: $175,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetChicago Horticultural Society: $17,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetIllinois Wesleyan University: $16,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNoahs Ark Foundation Inc: $13,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetLincoln Park Zoological Society: $12,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGreater Chicago Food Depository: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVEAP Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFirst Love International Ministries: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJunior Achievement of Chicago: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLoving Indeed Inc: $1,500 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetThurston County Food Bank: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHeavenly Pet Sanctuary: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 13.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Suzanne Smelcer Robinson Foundation with peer funders

About Suzanne Smelcer Robinson Foundation

How much does Suzanne Smelcer Robinson Foundation give?
Suzanne Smelcer Robinson Foundation reported 11 grants totaling $49,500 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 11 and 16 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Suzanne Smelcer Robinson Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2025, its largest causes are Animals (62%), Environment (7%), Education (6%).
Who are Suzanne Smelcer Robinson Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2025: Paws Chicago ($175k), Chicago Horticultural Society ($17k), Illinois Wesleyan University ($16k).
Does Suzanne Smelcer Robinson Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 55% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Suzanne Smelcer Robinson Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Suzanne Smelcer Robinson Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Suzanne Smelcer Robinson Foundation based?
Suzanne Smelcer Robinson Foundation is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Suzanne Smelcer Robinson’s filings →

More from the funding graph