Skip to content

· Private foundation

Suzanne Feld Zalk Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$68k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$53kHealth$48kArts & Culture$40kAnimals$20kHuman Services$15kReligion$10kCommunity Improvement$10kPhilanthropy$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY$10,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$10,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
JFMAF$5,000
THE BELLA PET INSURANCE FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $10k → 17%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 5%Burns Recovered: $10k → 11%ROCKHURST UNIVERSITY: $3k → 15%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 21%JFMAF: $5k → 6%SAFE HOUSE PROJECT: $10k → 9%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $10k → 17%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 5%BURNS RECOVERED: $8k → 11%CENTER FOR PRACTICAL BIOETHICS: $5k → 15%St Louis Symphony Orchestra: $10k → 21%JFMAF: $5k → 6%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $10k → 17%BURNS RECOVERED: $8k → 11%CHILDRENS MERCY HOSPITAL: $5k → 15%ST LOUIS ORCHESTRA: $10k → 21%MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CTR: $5k → 17%BURNS RECOVERED: $5k → 11%CHILDRENS MERCY HOSPITAL: $3k → 15%ST LOUIS ORCHESTRA: $10k → 21%BURNS RECOVERED: $5k → 11%ST LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $5k → 21%Craft Alliance: $10k → 11%CRAFT ALLIANCE: $10k → 11%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ST LOUIS: $5k → 11%TORAH PREP SCHOOL OF ST LOUIS: $5k → 11%CRAFT ALLIANCE: $5k → 11%TORAH PREP SCHOOL OF ST LOUIS: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$189k · 10 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +15% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
6

Total granted

$189k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+11%

Still filing today

40%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationCommunity ImprovementHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    5× · 2020–2025 · $36k
  • MS
    MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING
    3× · 2023–2025 · $30k
  • CA
    CRAFT ALLIANCE
    3× · 2020–2023 · $25k · revenue -21%

Funded once

  • SH
    SAFE HOUSE PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +111%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR PRACTICAL BIOETHICS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -5%
  • MS
    MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CTR
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Webster University

Founded in 1915, webster is a private non-profit and global university that is committed to delivering high-quality learning experiences that transform students for global citizenship and individual excellence.

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
8
Kansas Wesleyan University

Kansas wesleyan university is a liberal arts college that promotes and integrates academic excellence, spiritual development, personal well-being, and social responsibility.

Education
9
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
11
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Saint Joseph's University

As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rockhurst University; the most unlike its peers is Safe House Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $36,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $30,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERINGTHE BELLA PET INSURANCE FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherTHE BELLA PET INSURANCE FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJFMAF: $10,000 · OtherJFMAFTORAH PREP SCHOOL OF ST LOUIS: $10,000 · OtherTORAH PREP SCHOOL OF ST LOUISCENTER FOR PRACTICAL BIOETHICS INC: $5,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CTR: $5,000 · OtherGATEWAY HUMAN TRAFFICKING: $5,000 · OtherWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ST LOUIS: $5,000 · OtherBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $35,000 · EducationBRANDEIS UNIVERSITYWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSIT…ROCKHURST UNIVERSITY: $2,500 · EducationCRAFT ALLIANCE: $25,000 · Arts & CultureCRAFT ALLIANCESAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $15,000 · Arts & CultureSAINT LOUIS SYMPH…JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $15,000 · PhilanthropySAFE HOUSE PROJECT INC: $10,000 · Community ImprovementThe Children's Mercy Hospital: $7,500 · Health
Other$146,000Education$47,500Arts & Culture$40,000Philanthropy$15,000Community Improvement$10,000Health$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCRAFT ALLIANCE: $25,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetSAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE HOUSE PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetThe Children's Mercy Hospital: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR PRACTICAL BIOETHICS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetROCKHURST UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CRAFT ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds SAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER KANSAS CITY ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HOUSE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds The Children's Mercy Hospital ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR PRACTICAL BIOETHICS INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKHURST UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Suzanne Feld Zalk Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Suzanne Feld Zalk Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Brandeis University: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Suzanne Feld Zalk Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Suzanne Feld Zalk Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Suzanne Feld Zalk’s filings →

More from the funding graph