Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Suzanne Feld Zalk Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$68k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0182% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$53kHealth$48kArts & Culture$40kAnimals$20kHuman Services$15kReligion$10kCommunity Improvement$10kPhilanthropy$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY$10,000
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$10,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
JFMAF$5,000
THE BELLA PET INSURANCE FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 88% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $10k → 17%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 5%Burns Recovered: $10k → 11%ROCKHURST UNIVERSITY: $3k → 15%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 21%JFMAF: $5k → 6%SAFE HOUSE PROJECT: $10k → 9%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $10k → 17%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 5%BURNS RECOVERED: $8k → 11%CENTER FOR PRACTICAL BIOETHICS: $5k → 15%St Louis Symphony Orchestra: $10k → 21%JFMAF: $5k → 6%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $10k → 17%BURNS RECOVERED: $8k → 11%CHILDRENS MERCY HOSPITAL: $5k → 15%ST LOUIS ORCHESTRA: $10k → 21%MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CTR: $5k → 17%BURNS RECOVERED: $5k → 11%CHILDRENS MERCY HOSPITAL: $3k → 15%ST LOUIS ORCHESTRA: $10k → 21%BURNS RECOVERED: $5k → 11%ST LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $5k → 21%CRAFT ALLIANCE: $10k → 11%Craft Alliance: $10k → 11%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ST LOUIS: $5k → 11%TORAH PREP SCHOOL OF ST LOUIS: $5k → 11%CRAFT ALLIANCE: $5k → 11%TORAH PREP SCHOOL OF ST LOUIS: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$189k · 10 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
6

Total granted

$189k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+11%

Still filing today

40%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationCommunity ImprovementHealthPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    5× · 2020–2025 · $36k
  • MS
    MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING
    3× · 2023–2025 · $30k
  • CA
    CRAFT ALLIANCE
    3× · 2020–2023 · $25k · revenue -21%

Funded once

  • SH
    SAFE HOUSE PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +111%
  • WU
    WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ST LOUIS
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • CF
    CENTER FOR PRACTICAL BIOETHICS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -5%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Webster University

Founded in 1915, webster is a private non-profit and global university that is committed to delivering high-quality learning experiences that transform students for global citizenship and individual excellence.

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
8
Kansas Wesleyan University

Kansas wesleyan university is a liberal arts college that promotes and integrates academic excellence, spiritual development, personal well-being, and social responsibility.

Education
9
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

11
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Saint Joseph's University

As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rockhurst University and the most unlike its peers is Safe House Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $36,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING — $30,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERINGTHE BELLA PET INSURANCE FOUNDATION — $20,000 · OtherTHE BELLA PET INSURANCE FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTORAH PREP SCHOOL OF ST LOUIS — $10,000 · OtherTORAH PREP SCHOOL OF ST LOUISJFMAF — $10,000 · OtherJFMAFWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ST LOUIS — $5,000 · OtherCENTER FOR PRACTICAL BIOETHICS INC — $5,000 · OtherGATEWAY HUMAN TRAFFICKING — $5,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CTR — $5,000 · OtherBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY — $35,000 · EducationBRANDEIS UNIVERSITYWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSIT…ROCKHURST UNIVERSITY — $2,500 · EducationCRAFT ALLIANCE — $25,000 · Arts & CultureCRAFT ALLIANCESAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $15,000 · Arts & CultureSAINT LOUIS SYMPH…JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER KANSAS CITY — $15,000 · PhilanthropySAFE HOUSE PROJECT INC — $10,000 · Community ImprovementThe Children's Mercy Hospital — $7,500 · Health
Other$146,000Education$47,500Arts & Culture$40,000Philanthropy$15,000Community Improvement$10,000Health$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY — $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCRAFT ALLIANCE — $25,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetSAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER KANSAS CITY — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE HOUSE PROJECT INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetThe Children's Mercy Hospital — $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR PRACTICAL BIOETHICS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetROCKHURST UNIVERSITY — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds CRAFT ALLIANCE
  • Who funds SAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER KANSAS CITY
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds SAFE HOUSE PROJECT INC
  • Who funds The Children's Mercy Hospital
  • Who funds CENTER FOR PRACTICAL BIOETHICS INC
  • Who funds ROCKHURST UNIVERSITY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Suzanne Feld Zalk Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 9%
  • Brandeis University9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Suzanne Feld Zalk Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Suzanne Feld Zalk Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph