· Private foundation
Sutar-Sutaruk-Meyer Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k27 grants · $89k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $125k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HAZEL PARK PROMISE ZONE | $75,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| FARMINGTON FAMILY YMCA | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION | $9,000 |
| PINE STREET INN | $7,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE | $5,000 |
| PROJECT HEALTHY COMMUNITY | $5,000 |
| ROSIES PLACE | $5,000 |
| PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK | $5,000 |
| HUDA CLINIC | $5,000 |
| KRESGE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| THE GARY SINISE FOUNDATION | $4,000 |
| SEMPER FI AMERICA'S FUND | $4,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $132k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.
36 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UAUkrainian American Archives & Museum Inc5× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +133%
PINE STREET INN INC6× · 2020–2025 · $48k · revenue +36%- RPROSIE'S PLACE INC6× · 2020–2025 · $40k · revenue +39%
Funded once
- SVST VIATOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLone grant, 2022 · $10k
- GRGLAUCOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +130%
- CCCASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +88%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.
The mission of the uso foundation (foundation) is to support uso inc.'s (uso) mission to strengthen the well-being of the people serving in america's military and their families.
Umms provides a variety of inpatient/outpatient services to people in the maryland area regardless of their ability to pay. revenues are used to help defray the costs of services.
URF is a 501(c)(30 nonprofit based in California. We receive funds through private donations and spend them on several programs, providing aid, rescue, and relief for Ukrainian war victims in the form of cash donations for food, shelter,…
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
To provide humanitarian aid to citizens and soldiers of ukraine.
Save Ukraines mission is to support efforts to rescue and build a strong and resilient generation of children while strengthening families as the foundation of Ukraine. Save Ukraine rescues, restores, and rebuilds the lives of the most…
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Uossm usas mission is to provide impartial lifesaving support, medical relief and access to quality healthcare and mental health services to people and communities affected by crisis.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fisher House Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mandarin Immersion Magnet School Pto. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Ukrainian American Archives & Museum Inc ↗
- Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
- Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOS COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HEALTHY COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds UKRAINIAN NATIONAL MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND ↗
- Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HSPVA Friends ↗
- Who funds Health Unit on Davison Avenue ↗
- Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds LOCAL INFANT FORMULA FOR EMERGENCIES ↗
- Who funds ALBION COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Grace After Fire ↗
- Who funds WARRIOR FOUNDATION FREEDOM STATION ↗
- Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗
- Who funds CHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds GLAUCOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds LIBERTY UKRAINE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds U S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Greater Houston Community Foundation · The Powell Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Baker Hughes Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sutar-Sutaruk-Meyer Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Pine Street Inn Inc — 11% of income from government
- Rosie's Place Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Sutar-Sutaruk-Meyer Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Sutar-Sutaruk-Meyer Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.