Skip to content
Sutar-Sutaruk-Meyer Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Sutar-Sutaruk-Meyer Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$244k
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$510kHuman Services$205kRecreation & Sports$146kHousing & Shelter$120kArts & Culture$81kHealth$46kReligion$22kFood & Nutrition$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k27 grants · $89k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $125k
$3,750
Median grant
10
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HAZEL PARK PROMISE ZONE$75,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
FARMINGTON FAMILY YMCA$15,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$9,000
PINE STREET INN$7,500
KRESGE FOUNDATION$5,000
HUDA CLINIC$5,000
PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE$5,000
ROSIES PLACE$5,000
PROJECT HEALTHY COMMUNITY$5,000
SEMPER FI AMERICA'S FUND$4,000
THE GARY SINISE FOUNDATION$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $132k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PINE STREET INN: $10k → 16%SOS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $20k → 14%PINE STREET INN: $10k → 16%SOS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 14%WARRIOR FOUNDATION FREEDOM STATION: $3k → 11%PINE STREET INN: $8k → 16%WARRIOR FOUNDATION FREEDOM STATION: $2k → 11%PINE STREET INN: $8k → 16%HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE: $8k → 8%PINE STREET INN: $8k → 16%WARRIOR FOUNDATION FREEDOM STATION: $2k → 11%WARRIOR FOUNDATION FREEDOM STATION: $2k → 11%HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE: $8k → 8%PINE STREET INN: $5k → 16%HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE: $5k → 8%CHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 16%HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE: $5k → 8%CHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 16%CHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 16%CHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 16%HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE: $5k → 8%CHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 16%HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE: $5k → 8%LIFE HOUSTON: $2k → 16%LIFE HOUSTON: $2k → 16%LIFE HOUSTON: $2k → 16%LIFE HOUSTON: $2k → 16%LIFE HOUSTON: $2k → 16%LIFE HOUSTON: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
CA
VA
MD
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 36 repeat orgs$93k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
14

Total granted

$1.3M
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+25%

Still filing today

61%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationArts & CultureInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UA
    Ukrainian American Archives & Museum Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +133%
  • PINE STREET INN INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $48k · revenue +36%
  • RP
    ROSIE'S PLACE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $40k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • SV
    ST VIATOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • CC
    CASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +88%
  • GR
    GLAUCOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +130%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
2
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
3
Uso Foundation

The mission of the uso foundation (foundation) is to support uso inc.'s (uso) mission to strengthen the well-being of the people serving in america's military and their families.

—
4
University of Maryland Medical System Corporation

Umms provides a variety of inpatient/outpatient services to people in the maryland area regardless of their ability to pay. revenues are used to help defray the costs of services.

Health
5
Ukrainian Refugee Foundation

URF is a 501(c)(30 nonprofit based in California. We receive funds through private donations and spend them on several programs, providing aid, rescue, and relief for Ukrainian war victims in the form of cash donations for food, shelter,…

Public Safety & Disaster
6
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
7
Ukraine Defense Fund Inc

To provide humanitarian aid to citizens and soldiers of ukraine.

International
8
Save Ukraine Inc

Save Ukraines mission is to support efforts to rescue and build a strong and resilient generation of children while strengthening families as the foundation of Ukraine. Save Ukraine rescues, restores, and rebuilds the lives of the most…

—
9
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
10
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
11
Uossm Usa

Uossm usas mission is to provide impartial lifesaving support, medical relief and access to quality healthcare and mental health services to people and communities affected by crisis.

Health
12
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fisher House Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mandarin Immersion Magnet School Pto. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
23/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HAZEL PARK PROMISE ZONE: $449,500 · OtherHAZEL PARK PROMISE ZONECITY OF HAZEL PARK: $146,159 · OtherCITY OF HAZEL PARKIndividual grant recipient: $85,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFARMINGTON FAMILY YMCA: $75,000 · OtherFARMINGTON FAMILY YMCAIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · Other+23 more: $182,900 · Other+23 morePINE STREET INN INC: $47,500 · Human ServicesPINE STREE…HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE: $35,000 · Human ServicesHOUSE OF P…SOS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $25,000 · Human ServicesSOS COMMUN…LOCAL INFANT FORMULA FOR EMERGENCIES: $9,500 · Human ServicesLOCAL INFA…WARRIOR FOUNDATION FREEDOM STATION: $8,500 · Human ServicesWARRIOR FO…CHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $6,500 · Human ServicesUkrainian American Archives & Museum Inc: $50,000 · Arts & CultureUKRAINIAN NATIONAL MUSEUM: $17,500 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CulturePROJECT HEALTHY COMMUNITY: $22,000 · HealthSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $16,500 · HealthHealth Unit on Davison Avenue: $10,000 · HealthGrace After Fire: $8,750 · HealthGLAUCOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $5,000 · HealthSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $26,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationALBION COLLEGE: $9,500 · EducationLanier Middle School PTO: $2,500 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationROSIE'S PLACE INC: $40,000 · Housing & ShelterGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $16,500 · PhilanthropyLIBERTY UKRAINE FOUNDATION: $3,500 · PhilanthropyU S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION: $3,500 · InternationalHTX4UKRAINE: $1,500 · InternationalMedical Bridges Inc: $500 · International
Other$988,559Human Services$132,000Arts & Culture$68,500Health$67,250Education$49,000Housing & Shelter$40,000Philanthropy$20,000International$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUkrainian American Archives & Museum Inc: $50,000 over 5y, 21% of budgetPINE STREET INN INC: $47,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC: $40,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSE OF PROVIDENCE: $35,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $26,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $25,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPROJECT HEALTHY COMMUNITY: $22,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetUKRAINIAN NATIONAL MUSEUM: $17,500 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $16,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $16,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $14,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHSPVA Friends: $12,250 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHealth Unit on Davison Avenue: $10,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetLOCAL INFANT FORMULA FOR EMERGENCIES: $9,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetALBION COLLEGE: $9,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGrace After Fire: $8,750 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetWARRIOR FOUNDATION FREEDOM STATION: $8,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $6,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $6,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLAUCOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERTY UKRAINE FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $3,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetU S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLanier Middle School PTO: $2,500 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetThe Awty International School: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHTX4UKRAINE: $1,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSouthern Smoke Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANDARIN IMMERSION MAGNET SCHOOL PTO: $1,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetMedical Bridges Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Ukrainian American Archives & Museum Inc ↗
  • Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
  • Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOS COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HEALTHY COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds UKRAINIAN NATIONAL MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HSPVA Friends ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Health Unit on Davison Avenue ↗
  • Who funds LOCAL INFANT FORMULA FOR EMERGENCIES ↗
  • Who funds ALBION COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Grace After Fire ↗
  • Who funds WARRIOR FOUNDATION FREEDOM STATION ↗
  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds CHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds GLAUCOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY UKRAINE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving …Greater Houston Commu…The Powell FoundationShell USA Company Fou…United Way for Southe…Baker Hughes Foundati…Community Foundation …Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Pfizer Foundation…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Renaissance Charitabl…Vanguard Charitable E…
The Blackbaud Giving FundSC15.7× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Greater Houston Community Foundation · The Powell Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Baker Hughes Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sutar-Sutaruk-Meyer Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sutar-Sutaruk-Meyer Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Pine Street Inn Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sutar-Sutaruk-Meyer Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Sutar-Sutaruk-Meyer Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sutar-Sutaruk-Meyer’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home