Skip to content

California · Private foundation

Surfing for Hope Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$13k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
2
Grants FY2025
1
Organizations funded FY2024
100%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$12,500
Largest grant, FY2025
$12,500
Organizations funded a year
1 to 11
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$139k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 100% of the organizations Surfing for Hope Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsScience & TechHealthPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving2$13k50%
FY20241$1k100%
FY20231$2730%
FY20227$29k0%
FY20211$32k100%
FY20208$14k25%
FY201910$82k30%
FY201811$40k55%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$244kHuman Services$12kArts & Culture$12kRecreation & Sports$7kScience & Tech$1kEnvironment$1kInternational$500

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 13 grantees
All grantees of Surfing for Hope Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Cancer Support Community - California Central Coast$18,00043%
17 Strong$14,28457%
San Luis Obispo International Film Festival Inc$11,62423%
San Luis Obispo County Womenade$5,00028%
Camp Kesem National$4,81650%
Surfers of Tomorrow$4,00034%
Central Coast Dragon Boat Assn$2,00021%
Jacks Helping Hand Inc$2,00010%
Dreammakers$1,0001n/a
Valley Children's Hospital$1,00010%
Corazon Latino Inc$1,00010%
Surf for Life$50010%
Cambria Community Council Inc$10010%

Plus 7 recipients with no EIN on record ($212k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Surfing for Hope Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCancer Support Community - California Central Coast: $18,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budget17 Strong: $14,284 over 5y, 7.3% of budgetSan Luis Obispo International Film Festival Inc: $11,624 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetSan Luis Obispo County Womenade: $5,000 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetCamp Kesem National: $4,816 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSurfers of Tomorrow: $4,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetCentral Coast Dragon Boat Assn: $2,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetJacks Helping Hand Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetValley Children's Hospital: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCorazon Latino Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSurf for Life: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCambria Community Council Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 12.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation San Luis ObispoCA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation San Luis Obispo · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Surfing for Hope Foundation with peer funders

About Surfing for Hope Foundation

How much does Surfing for Hope Foundation give?
Surfing for Hope Foundation reported 2 grants totaling $12,600 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 11 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Surfing for Hope Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Health (88%), Human Services (4%), Arts & Culture (4%).
Who are Surfing for Hope Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Cancer Support Community - California Central Coast ($18k), 17 Strong ($14k), San Luis Obispo International Film Festival Inc ($12k).
Does Surfing for Hope Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Surfing for Hope Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Surfing for Hope Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Community Foundation San Luis Obispo, Network for Good, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc.
Where is Surfing for Hope Foundation based?
Surfing for Hope Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Surfing for Hope’s filings →

More from the funding graph