Skip to content

· Public charity

Supporting Kids' Athletics & Education

Members provide volunteer services at sports and entertainment venues with concession stands to raise funds to support other 501(c)(3) charities who develop children's athletics, education and arts.

$1.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
70
Grants FY2025still arriving
—
States reached
$275k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Education$3.1MRecreation & Sports$946kArts & Culture$285kPhilanthropy$166kReligion$95kHuman Services$47kYouth Development$26kCommunity Improvement$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 70 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 70 grants below total $1,693,931, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,876,210 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $182,279 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k32 grants · $235k
  • $10k–50k29 grants · $561k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $622k
  • $250k+1 grant · $275k
$11,500
Median grant
—
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY$275,173
MADPAC BOOSTER CLUB INC (MICHELLE'S$121,448
DE LA SALLE COLLEGIATE$104,655
OAKLAND UNIVERSITY$76,501
WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY$69,595
LEAP TO THE BEAT$69,389
ADORA FOUNDATION$68,751
ROAD SCHOLAR$59,625
MACOMB COMMUNITY COLLEGE$52,343
CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY$48,530
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN (REGENTS OF$34,578
ADRIAN COLLEGE$34,550
ALBION COLLEGE$33,288
ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO$30,000
NORTHERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY$28,579
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 66% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $24k → 14%THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $9k → 17%ARTIC EDGE UNITY SYNCHRONIZED: $10k → 5%GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $26k → 8%BLOOFIELD HILLS SOCCER CLUB: $11k → 8%LAKEVIEW BAND PARENTS ASSOCIATION: $12k → 10%THE NORTHERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $39k → 11%SIENA HEIGHTS UNIVERSITY: $14k → 12%WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $8k → 12%EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDAT: $7k → 14%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $142k → 16%CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $6k → 19%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $50k → 21%WEBSTER UNIVERSITY: $26k → 11%MOREHOUSE COLLEGE: $15k → 13%INDIANA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $20k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME DU LAC: $14k → 13%ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $16k → 14%ARCTIC EDGE UNITY SYNCHRONIZED: $5k → 5%GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $12k → 8%BLOOMFIELD HILLS SOCCER CLUB: $9k → 8%OUR LADY OF HOPE PARISH (ST GERMAIN: $8k → 10%THE NORTHERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FO: $10k → 11%SIENA HEIGHTS UNIVERSITY: $13k → 12%WESTERN MICHIGAN SKATE CLUB: $7k → 12%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $68k → 16%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $26k → 21%WEBSTER UNIVERISTY: $7k → 11%INDIANA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $19k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME DU LAC: $13k → 13%BISHOP FOLEY CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $11k → 8%ST ANNE CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $13k → 10%GIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHEASTERN MI: $5k → 21%SAINT MARYS COLLEGE: $9k → 13%DETROIT SKATING CLUB: $6k → 8%ST ANNE PARISH WARREN: $8k → 10%MACOMB COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $29k → 10%LEAP TO THE BEAT INC: $61k → 10%MACOMB COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $11k → 10%LEAP TO THE BEAT INC: $53k → 10%ST PETER LUTHERAN CHURCH: $8k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.5M · 56 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +11% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

56 repeat relationships: 33 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 37 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

56
56

Total granted

$3.5M
$850k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+6%

Still filing today

14%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $547k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TN
    THE NORTHERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $49k · revenue +65%
  • MC
    MACOMB COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $40k · revenue +46%
  • Rochester Institute of Technology
    2× · 2022–2023 · $39k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • VE
    VARIOUS ENTITIES UNDER 5000
    one grant, 2022 · $124k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $99k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $48k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
2
Mount Mary University Inc

Mount mary university, an urban catholic university for women sponsored by the school sisters of notre dame, provides an environment for the development of the whole person. the university encourages leadership, integrity, and a deep sense…

—
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
5
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
6
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
7
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
8
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
9
Xavier University

Xavier is a jesuit catholic university rooted in the liberal arts tradition. our mission is to educate each student intellectually, morally, and spiritually. we create learning opportunities through rigorous academic and professional…

Education
10
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
11
Michigan State University College of Law

The mission of the michigan state university college of law is to provide a rigorous educational program which prepares a diverse community of students to be national and international leaders in private legal practice, business and…

—
12
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Siena Heights University; the most unlike its peers is Arctic Edge Unity Synchronized Skating Teams Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 151 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $609,431 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITYOTHER CHARITIES: $219,178 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $210,132 · OtherMADPAC BOOSTERS CLUB INC: $168,359 · OtherOAKLAND UNIVERSITY: $162,106 · Other+131 more: $3,196,229 · Other+131 moreTHE NORTHERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $49,066 · EducationMACOMB COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $39,563 · EducationRochester Institute of Technology: $39,425 · EducationINDIANA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $39,100 · EducationWebster University: $32,500 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $27,315 · EducationSIENA HEIGHTS UNIVERSITY: $26,793 · EducationMOREHOUSE COLLEGE: $15,146 · EducationLAKEVIEW BAND PARENTS ASSOCIATION: $11,949 · Education+3 more: $24,465 · EducationRED'S PONTIAC & BLOOMFIELD HILLS YOUTH SOCCER CLUB: $19,807 · Recreation & SportsARCTIC EDGE UNITY SYNCHRONIZED SKATING TEAMS INC: $15,646 · Recreation & SportsGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $5,200 · Youth Development
Other$4,565,435Education$305,322Recreation & Sports$35,453Youth Development$5,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NORTHERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $49,066 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMACOMB COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $39,563 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetRochester Institute of Technology: $39,425 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $39,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWebster University: $32,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $27,315 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIENA HEIGHTS UNIVERSITY: $26,793 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRED'S PONTIAC & BLOOMFIELD HILLS YOUTH SOCCER CLUB: $19,807 over 2y, 32% of budgetARCTIC EDGE UNITY SYNCHRONIZED SKATING TEAMS INC: $15,646 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetMOREHOUSE COLLEGE: $15,146 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $8,980 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame: $8,585 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $6,900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DETROIT SKATING CLUB INC: $6,383 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $5,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NORTHERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MACOMB COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Rochester Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds INDIANA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
  • Who funds Webster University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Consumers Energy FoundationMI13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Consumers Energy Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Supporting Kids' Athletics & Education funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Supporting Kids' Athletics & Education. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 151 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Supporting Kids' Athletics & Education’s filings →

    More from the funding graph