· Public charity
Support Nebraska
To promote charitable giving, community involvement and prosperity in the state of nebraska by engaging community and business leaders through charitable assistance and to bring people together and support community causes in a fun and compelling way.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $125,441 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $175,911 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $50,470 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $118k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PGA REACH FOUNDATION | $35,500 |
| NEBRASKA GOLF FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| EQUAL PAY - INSPIRING CONFIDENCE FOR GIRLS | $19,941 |
| FIRST TEE OF OMAHA | $15,000 |
| VITA NOVA MATERNITY COMMUNITY | $15,000 |
| SAVE PROGRAM INC | $12,500 |
| WESTSIDE FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $138k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +128% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TMTEAMMATES MENTORING PROGRAM2× · 2018–2019 · $95k · revenue +355%
- NPNEBRASKA PGA FOUNDATION3× · 2020–2024 · $63k · revenue +219%
- HJHOGANS JUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION4× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +49%
Funded once
- CHCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $40k · revenue -58%
- BSBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 326 MID-AMERICA COUNCILone grant, 2022 · $37k · revenue +9%
MARCH OF DIMES INCone grant, 2018 · $32k · revenue -41%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The objective of the nebraska golf association is to foster, promote, and advance the interest and the true spirit of amateur golf throughout the state of nebraska, to lend its cooperation and assistance to the united states golf…
To impact the lives of young people by providing learning facilities and educational programs that build character and instill life-enhancing values through the game of golf.
Children's physicians delivers the highest quality pediatric primary care while supporting education and research.
Midwest athletes against childhood cancer, inc.'s mission is to find a cure for childhood cancer and related blood disorders by providing critical funding for research.
Preserve the integrity of competition, inspire true sport, protect the rights of u.s. athletes
Provides a means whereby the resources, expertise, and knowledge of the pediatric specialty physicians can be marshaled to develop, promote, and make available to patients from omaha, ne and the surrounding area, pediatric, academic, and…
To positvely impact the lives of young people, including those with special needs and veterans by providing educational programs that build character, instill life enhancing values and promote healthy choices through the game of golf.
Connecting families affected by childhood cancer by providing opportunities that encourage relationships and strengthen community.
To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy
Our mission is to financially support programs which share our belief that participation in organized athletics enriches young lives and develops future community leaders.
The mission of the scga junior golf foundation is to develop an inclusive golf community that enables kids to thrive on and beyond the course. we believe that every kid in southern california, no matter their circumstance, should have the…
Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Omaha Youth for Christ and the most unlike its peers is Vita Nova Maternity Community. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TEAMMATES MENTORING PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA PGA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOGANS JUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EQUAL PLAY - INSPIRING CONFIDENCE FOR GIRLS ↗
- Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 326 MID-AMERICA COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NEBRASKA INC ↗
- Who funds STUDENTS ATHLETES VALUES EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA GOLF FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WESTSIDE COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OMAHA INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HARMONY ↗
- Who funds OMAHA YOUTH FOR CHRIST ↗
- Who funds AVENUE SCHOLARS ↗
- Who funds VITA NOVA MATERNITY COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds Lane Thomas Foundation ↗
- Who funds PGA TOUR CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
- Who funds OPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Lozier Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · Parker Family Foundation · Mammel Family Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Singer Foundation · Growing Good Foundation · The Dorothy B Davis Foundation · The Nebraska Medical Center · Suzanne & Walter Scott Foundation · Mutual of Omaha Foundation · Leland J & Dorothy H Olson Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Support Nebraska funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.