Skip to content
Suntrust Bank Charitable-Irr Tr(1071 at a glance

· Private foundation

Suntrust Bank Charitable-Irr Tr(1071

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$5.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$5.0MArts & Culture$1.5MEducation$1.4MPublic Benefit$1.1MRecreation & Sports$1.0MYouth Development$1.0MCommunity Improvement$916kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,200,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRUST FOR THE NATIONAL MALL$1,500,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500,000
THE RON CLARK ACADEMY INC$1,200,000
WESTSIDE FUTURE FUND INC$750,000
LIVING CITIES$537,630
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LIVING CITIES: $538k → 14%WESTSIDE FUTURE FUND INC: $750k → 13%WESTSIDE FUTURE FUND INC: $166k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
3
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
4
University of Maryland Otorhino-Laryngology-Head & Neck Surgery Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
5
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
7
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
8
St Martin Hospital Inc

To improve, maintain and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
9
University of Maryland Dermatologists Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
10
University of Maryland Neurology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
11
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
12
University of Maryland Pediatric Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Grady Health Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ron Clark Academy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $1,500,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientATLANTA BRAVES FOUNDATION - HLAF: $1,000,000 · OtherATLANTA BRAVES FOUNDATION - HLAFBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA - ATLANTA: $1,000,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA - …PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER FDN: $500,000 · OtherPRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER FDNTRUST FOR THE NATIONAL MALL: $1,500,000 · Arts & CultureTRUST FOR THE NATIONA…THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION: $1,100,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUN…CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC: $2,000,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HEALTHCAR…SENTARA HOSPITALS: $500,000 · HealthSENTARA HOSPITALSRON CLARK ACADEMY INC: $1,200,000 · EducationRON CLARK ACADEMY I…MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $1,000,000 · EducationMOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF…CRISTO REY RESEARCH TRIANGLE HIGH SCHOOL INC: $200,000 · EducationCRISTO REY RESEARCH…WESTSIDE FUTURE FUND INC: $916,000 · Human ServicesWESTSIDE FU…LIVING CITIES INC THE NATIONAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE: $537,630 · Human ServicesLIVING CITI…THE GRADY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $1,000,000 · Philanthropy
Other$4,000,000Arts & Culture$2,600,000Health$2,500,000Education$2,400,000Human Services$1,453,630Philanthropy$1,000,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC: $2,000,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetRON CLARK ACADEMY INC: $1,200,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION: $1,100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE GRADY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetWESTSIDE FUTURE FUND INC: $916,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetLIVING CITIES INC THE NATIONAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE: $537,630 over 1y, 13% of budgetSENTARA HOSPITALS: $500,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRISTO REY RESEARCH TRIANGLE HIGH SCHOOL INC: $200,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
National Philanthropic TrustPA9.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Suntrust Bank Charitable-Irr Tr(1071 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Suntrust Bank Charitable-Irr Tr(1071. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Suntrust Bank Charitable-Irr Tr(1071’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home