Skip to content
Sunnyside Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Sunnyside Inc

The mission of sunnyside since 1912 is to provide for the health, education and social welfare needs of the adams county, nebraska community, including the elderly, through the distribution of grants derived from entrusted funds.

$206k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$93k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$624kHuman Services$394kEducation$107kHousing & Shelter$90kFood & Nutrition$42kCommunity Improvement$38kArts & Culture$36kPhilanthropy$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $173,777, the rows itemized in this filing. The $205,890 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $32,113 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $68k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $93k
$10,944
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARY LANNING HEALTHCARE$93,073
UNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL NEBRASKA$19,590
CROSSROADS$17,170
REVIVE INC$10,944
SPECIAL SCOOPS II$10,000
HPS FOUNDATION$10,000
MIDLAND AREA AGENCY ON AGING$7,000
ST MARKS EPISCOPAL PRO-CATHEDRAL CHURCH DBA LAUNDRY LOVE$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $259k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%CASA OF SOUTH CENTRAL NEBRASKA: $32k → 11%CASA OF SOUTH CENTRAL NEBRASKA: $25k → 11%CASA OF SOUTH CENTRAL NEBRASKA: $20k → 11%CASA OF SOUTH CENTRAL NEBRASKA: $19k → 11%CASA OF SOUTH CENTRAL NEBRASKA: $17k → 11%MIDLAND AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $15k → 11%CASA OF SOUTH CENTRAL NEBRASKA: $13k → 11%CASA OF SOUTH CENTRAL NEBRASKA: $11k → 11%CASA OF SOUTH CENTRAL NEBRASKA: $10k → 11%MIDLAND AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $10k → 11%MIDLAND AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $10k → 11%MIRIAM'S HOPE: $10k → 11%MIDLAND AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $9k → 11%MIDLAND AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $9k → 11%HASTINGS FAMILY YMCA: $8k → 11%HASTINGS FAMILY YMCA: $8k → 11%HASTINGS FAMILY YMCA: $8k → 11%MIDLAND AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $8k → 11%MIDLAND AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $7k → 11%CASA OF SOUTH CENTRAL NEBRASKA: $6k → 11%MARYLAND LIVING CENTER: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 18 repeat orgs$164k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
8

Total granted

$1.3M
$164k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+43%

Still filing today

61%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MARY LANNING MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $540k · revenue +28%
  • CO
    CASA OF SOUTH CENTRAL NEBRASKA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $157k · revenue +0%
  • CC
    CROSSROADS CENTER INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $85k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • HC
    HASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue 0%
  • HS
    HASTINGS SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $19k
  • MH
    MIRIAMS HOPEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +293%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hastings Area Chamber of Commerce

To promote the city of hastings, nebraska.

—
2
Hastings Community Foundation Inc

The hastings community foundation works to perpetuate and enrich the quality of life in hastings and the surrounding area through the prudent investment and management of philanthropic donations.

Philanthropy
3
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
4
Community Justice Center

A restorative justice agency committed to habilitating justice in nebraska.

Crime & Legal
5
Lincoln Behavioral Services

To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…

Health
6
Housing Services of Mid Michigan

To assist people with low or moderate income to obtain safe and affordable housing

Housing & Shelter
7
Michigan Christian Home

The michigan christian home dba beacon hill at eastgate, a not-for-profit corporation, provides housing and health services in a christian environment for older adults, thus enabling them to meet their ongoing physical, social and…

—
8
Nebraska Youth Center

The center operates a group home for troubled youth, ages 12-18, in western nebraska.

—
9
Heartland Senior Services Heartland of Story County

Heartland of Story County offers life-enriching opportunities for older adults and provides support for their families and caregivers.

Human Services
10
Martin Luther Home Corporation

To provide healthcare and other related services for aging persons regardless of the ability of residents to pay for these services.

—
11
Health Center Association of Nebraska

Support the state's federally qualified health centers in providing accessible and quality health care.

Health
12
Hospice of Midland Inc

Hospice provides care from the heart to fulfill the unique needs of patients and families.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Action Partnership of Mid-Nebr; the most unlike its peers is Revive Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE MARY LANNING MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $539,746 · HealthTHE MARY LANNING MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATIONREVIVE INC: $39,363 · HealthREVIVE INCYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $94,580 · OtherYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSO…COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF MID-NEBR: $37,916 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHI…SPECIAL SCOOPS: $26,023 · OtherSPECIAL SCOOPSGIVING BACK SMILESCREIGHTON UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF NURSING: $21,265 · OtherGIVING BACK SMILESCREIGHTON…HASTINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $20,910 · OtherHASTINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOU…GRACE LIFE CHURCH: $20,880 · OtherGRACE LIFE CHURCHTHREADS OF GRACE INC: $20,619 · OtherTHREADS OF GRACE INCHASTINGS SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL: $19,150 · OtherHASTINGS SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLSOUTH CENTRAL BEHAVIORAL SERVICES: $18,481 · OtherSOUTH CENTRAL BEHAVIORAL SE…HASTINGS MUSEUM: $17,126 · OtherST MARKS PRO CATHEDRAL: $12,000 · Other+4 more: $32,507 · Other+4 moreCASA OF SOUTH CENTRAL NEBRASKA: $157,321 · Human ServicesCASA OF SOUTH CENTRAL…MIDLAND AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $67,500 · Human ServicesMIDLAND AREA AGENCY O…THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF HASTINGS NEBRASKA: $32,000 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRIS…MIRIAMS HOPE: $10,000 · Human Services+1 more: $5,561 · Human ServicesHASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $100,000 · EducationCreighton University: $7,039 · EducationCROSSROADS CENTER INC: $84,716 · Housing & ShelterUNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL NEBRASKA INC: $39,590 · Philanthropy
Health$579,109Other$341,457Human Services$272,382Education$107,039Housing & Shelter$84,716Philanthropy$39,590

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MARY LANNING MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $539,746 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCASA OF SOUTH CENTRAL NEBRASKA: $157,321 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $94,580 over 4y, 8.3% of budgetCROSSROADS CENTER INC: $84,716 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetMIDLAND AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $67,500 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL NEBRASKA INC: $39,590 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetREVIVE INC: $39,363 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF MID-NEBR: $37,916 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF HASTINGS NEBRASKA: $32,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetHASTINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $20,910 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetSOUTH CENTRAL BEHAVIORAL SERVICES: $18,481 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHASTINGS MUSEUM: $17,126 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCreighton University: $7,039 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $6,935 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND: $5,572 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOS SWIM HASTINGS: $5,561 over 1y, 17% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MARY LANNING MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF SOUTH CENTRAL NEBRASKA ↗
  • Who funds HASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND AREA AGENCY ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL NEBRASKA INC ↗
  • Who funds REVIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF MID-NEBR ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF HASTINGS NEBRASKA ↗
  • Who funds HASTINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH CENTRAL BEHAVIORAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds HASTINGS MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds MIRIAMS HOPE ↗
  • Who funds Creighton University ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds SOS SWIM HASTINGS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hastings Community Fo…LeRoy Thom Jean Thom …The Graff Charitable …United Way of South C…Johnson-Wissing Famil…Land O'Lakes Foundati…The Spotts Trust Char…Greater Grand Island …The Sherwood Foundati…Bnsf Railway Foundati…First Interstate Banc…Donor Advised Charita…
Hastings Community Foundation IncNE28.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hastings Community Foundation Inc · LeRoy Thom Jean Thom and T-L Foundation · The Graff Charitable Foundation Inc Co P Mark Graff · United Way of South Central Nebraska Inc · Johnson-Wissing Family Foundation Inc · Land O'Lakes Foundation · The Spotts Trust Charles Hermes Trustee · Greater Grand Island Community Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sunnyside Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sunnyside Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sunnyside Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Sunnyside Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sunnyside’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home