Skip to content
Sunbury Northumberland Commtr at a glance

· Private foundation

Sunbury Northumberland Commtr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$105k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$274kHealth$241kHuman Services$172kEducation$109kPublic Safety & Disaster$94kYouth Development$63kPublic Benefit$48kCommunity Improvement$29kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $55k
$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREATER SUSQ VALLEY UNITED WAY$22,070
EVANGELICAL COMMUNITY HOSPITAL$12,974
GREATER SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY YMCA$10,000
DEGENSTEIN COMMUNITY LIBRARY$10,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS OF HARRISBURG$6,000
SUSQUEHANNA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS$5,000
BIRTHRIGHT OF SUNBURY$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,895
KEYSTONE HUMAN SERVICES$3,500
Individual grant recipient$3,500
Individual grant recipient$2,775
ST MATTHEW'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$2,500
CENTRAL SUSQUEHANNA SIGHT SERVICES$2,500
SETEBAID SERVICES INC$2,500
SUNBURY FOR KEITHANS BLUEBIRD$2,369
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CONCERNED CITIZENS FOR CHILD CARE I: $2k → 14%CONCERNED CITIZENS FOR CHILD CARE I: $2k → 14%CONCERNED CITIZENS FOR CHILD CARE I: $2k → 14%CONCERNED CITIZENS FOR CHILD CARE I: $2k → 14%CONCERNED CITIZENS FOR CHILD CARE I: $2k → 14%CONCERNED CITIZENS FOR CHILD CARE I: $2k → 14%CONCERNED CITIZENS FOR CHILD CARE I: $1k → 14%CONCERNED CITIZENS FOR CHILD CARE I: $1k → 14%CONCERNED CITIZENS FOR CHILD CARE I: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 49 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

49 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
5

Total granted

$1.2M
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+178%

Still filing today

33%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsPublic BenefitEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY UNITED WAY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $267k · revenue +95%
  • GS
    Greater Susquehanna Valley YMCA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $111k · revenue +88%
  • JR
    JOHN R KAUFFMAN JR PUBLIC LIBRARY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $100k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • AC
    A COMMUNITY CLINICgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue +178%
  • CO
    CITY OF SUNBURY PARKS & RECREATION
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
  • HD
    HIS DISCIPLES FOOD PANTRY
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gettysburg Hospital

Gettysburg hospital is a tax-exempt organization dedicated to providing high quality health care services for the people who live, work, travel through, and vacation in adams county, pennsylvania and northern maryland.

Health
2
Northeastern Pennsylvania Health Care Foundation
Education
3
Philhaven

Philhaven promotes hope, healing and wholeness through the provision of behavioral resources.

Health
4
Wayne Memorial Community Health Centers

Wayne Memorial Community Health Centers creates and sustains healthy rural communities by providing accessible, high quality medical, dental and behavioral health care for all, while recognizing and addressing other factors that influence…

Health
5
Community Medical Center

Strive to make better health easier by providing access to affordable, high quality health services through equitable, innovative, and inclusive care models that support patient care, education, research, and community service.

Health
6
Chambersburg Hospital

The chambersburg hospital is a regional non-profit health care organization committed to the improvement of the health and well-being of the people in southcentral pennsylvania.

Health
7
Hospice of Central Pennsylvania

Our vision is a community that embraces specialized care at the end of life with the same importance that is given at the beginning of life. our guiding principles are service - to make a difference in the lives of our patients/families,…

Human Services
8
Vna Home Health Services

Vna home health services provides part-time, skilled, intermittent home health services that have been ordered by a physician and are medically necessary to the treatment of an illness or injury. vna home health services offers a wide…

—
9
Sadler Health Center Corporation

To advance the health of our community by providing inclusive, high quality and compassionate care.

Health
10
Punxsutawney Area Hospital Inc

To provide high quality, cost effective, primary health care and to coordinate care for patients requiring secondary and tertiary services.

Health
11
The Good Samaritan Hospital of Lebanon Pennsylvania

The good samaritan hospital is a tax-exempt organization dedicated to providing high-quality, compassionate healthcare that improves the overall health of the community.

Health
12
Keystone Care

Providing administrative services to its two subsidiaries, keystone hospice and keystone home health, llc. providing social services to medically fragile populations in southeastern pennsylvania.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Susquehanna Valley United Way; the most unlike its peers is The Amateur Softball Association of Pennsylvania Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Greater Susquehanna Valley YMCA: $110,985 · OtherGreater Susquehanna Valley YMCAJOHN R KAUFFMAN JR PUBLIC LIBRARY: $99,772 · OtherJOHN R KAUFFMAN JR PUBLIC LIBRARYAMERICAN RED CROSS: $64,156 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSSUSQUEHANNA COUNCIL INC: $47,567 · OtherSUSQUEHANNA COUNCIL INCBIRTHRIGHT OF SUNBURY INC: $37,861 · OtherCENTRAL SUSQUEHANNA SIGHT SERVICES: $35,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $32,889 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $27,735 · Other+35 more: $331,566 · Other+35 moreSUSQUEHANNA VALLEY UNITED WAY: $267,363 · PhilanthropySUSQUEHANNA VALLEY UNITE…EVANGELICAL COMMUNITY HOSPITAL: $73,974 · HealthEVANGELICAL…SETEBAID SERVICES INC: $23,382 · HealthSETEBAID SE…KEYSTONE HUMAN SERVICES: $12,500 · HealthKEYSTONE HU…A COMMUNITY CLINIC: $7,000 · HealthA COMMUNITY…GEISINGER HEALTH: $5,896 · Health+1 more: $1,120 · HealthCONCERNED CITIZENS CHILD CARE INC: $16,737 · Human ServicesThe Amateur Softball Association of Pennsylvania Inc: $6,477 · Recreation & SportsTHE ARC SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY: $5,783 · EducationSUNBURYS REVITALIZATION INC: $4,500 · EnvironmentUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $984 · Public Benefit
Other$788,231Philanthropy$267,363Health$123,872Human Services$16,737Recreation & Sports$6,477Education$5,783Environment$4,500Public Benefit$984

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSUSQUEHANNA VALLEY UNITED WAY: $267,363 over 9y, 3.2% of budgetGreater Susquehanna Valley YMCA: $110,985 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetJOHN R KAUFFMAN JR PUBLIC LIBRARY: $99,772 over 9y, 4.3% of budgetEVANGELICAL COMMUNITY HOSPITAL: $73,974 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT OF SUNBURY INC: $37,861 over 9y, 5.8% of budgetCENTRAL SUSQUEHANNA SIGHT SERVICES: $35,700 over 9y, 4.8% of budgetSETEBAID SERVICES INC: $23,382 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetCONCERNED CITIZENS CHILD CARE INC: $16,737 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetKEYSTONE HUMAN SERVICES: $12,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPRIESTLEY FORSYTH MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $9,432 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetA COMMUNITY CLINIC: $7,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetHAVEN MINISTRY: $6,734 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetThe Amateur Softball Association of Pennsylvania Inc: $6,477 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGEISINGER HEALTH: $5,896 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARC SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY: $5,783 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSUNBURYS REVITALIZATION INC: $4,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetAVENUES: $1,120 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $984 over 9y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds Greater Susquehanna Valley YMCA ↗
  • Who funds JOHN R KAUFFMAN JR PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds EVANGELICAL COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT OF SUNBURY INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL SUSQUEHANNA SIGHT SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds SETEBAID SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds CONCERNED CITIZENS CHILD CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds KEYSTONE HUMAN SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds PRIESTLEY FORSYTH MEMORIAL LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds A COMMUNITY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds HAVEN MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds SUNBURY AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Amateur Softball Association of Pennsylvania Inc ↗
  • Who funds GEISINGER HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The 1994 Charles B De…Community Giving Foun…Guyer FoundationDegenstein Charitable…S Luther Savidge Trust2006 Edward S Rosenbl…Degenstein Charles B …Sunbury Area Communit…Fern & Gladys Moyer M…William J and Ann M R…Seiple Family Foundat…The John and Barbara …
The 1994 Charles B Degenstein FdnPA28.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The 1994 Charles B Degenstein Fdn · Community Giving Foundation · Guyer Foundation · Degenstein Charitable Foundation · S Luther Savidge Trust · 2006 Edward S Rosenblum Foundation · Degenstein Charles B Fdn-Char Tr · Sunbury Area Community Foundation · Fern & Gladys Moyer Memorial Trust · William J and Ann M Roll Foundation · Seiple Family Foundation · The John and Barbara Pagana Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sunbury Northumberland Commtr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sunbury Northumberland Commtr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sunbury Northumberland Commtr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home