Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Sullivan Foundation Julie Coscarelli Trustee

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$1.3M
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 55% of SULLIVAN FOUNDATION JULIE COSCARELLI TRUSTEE’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $59k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $392k
  • $250k+3 grants · $2.0M
$7,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$8.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JOSEPH UNIVERSITY$1,252,750
CONNECTICUT CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC$506,000
FORDHAM UNIVERSITY$250,000
RENBROOK SCHOOL$242,000
THE COVE CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN$100,000
HARTFORD COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION$50,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
BRIDGE FAMILY CENTER$19,000
NEW BRITAIN MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART$10,000
ST GERARDS CENTER FOR LIFE$7,000
THE CHICK MISSION$5,000
NORTHWEST CT YMCA$5,000
MAX CARES FOUNDATION$4,300
FOUNDATION FOR CONNECTICUT SCHOOLS$3,000
BLOOD CANCER UNITED$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $138k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BOYS TOWN: $1k → 12%THE CHICK MISSION: $5k → 17%NORTHWEST CT YMCA: $5k → 9%THE CHICK MISSION: $3k → 17%NORTHWEST CT YMCA: $4k → 9%THE COVE CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN: $100k → 12%THE COVE CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN: $5k → 12%YMCA OF GREATER HARTFORD: $5k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER HARTFORD: $3k → 11%ST GERARDS CENTER FOR LIFE: $7k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
WI
NY
MA
IA
CT
NE
VA
MD
TN
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.3M · 45 repeat orgs$738k to everyone else

45 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 33 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
50

Total granted

$2.3M
$154k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+33%

Still filing today

58%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $584k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsCrime & LegalReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RS
    RENBROOK SCHOOL INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $280k · revenue +11%
  • FU
    Fordham University
    4× · 2018–2025 · $256k · revenue +40%
  • TC
    The Cove Center for Grieving Children Inc
    2× · 2023–2025 · $105k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $30k
  • HI
    HORIZONS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • TR
    TARA RESCUE FARM
    one grant, 2023 · $9k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hartford HealthCare Medical Group Specialists Pllc

The Mission of Hartford HealthCare Medical Group Specialists, PLLC is to put the patients first, provide coordinated quality care and value, exceed the expectations of patients, providers, staff and the community that it serves.

Health
2
Connecticut Association of Health Care Facilities Inc

The association is the leader in providing services to and advocating for, the state's providers of long-term, subacute, rehabilitative, and assisted living care. additionally, the association serves as a clearing house for information…

3
Hartford Hospital

To improve the health and healing of the people and communities we serve.

Health
4
Visiting Nurse Services of Connecticut Inc

Visiting Nurse Services of Connecticut, Inc., (VNS) a nonprofit health care provider, finds its mission in the provision of quality home health and hospice services to individuals, families and the communities it serves. VNS is committed…

5
Hartford HealthCare Medical Group Inc

The Mission of Hartford HealthCare Medical Group is to put patients first, provide coordinated quality care and value, and exceed the expectations of patients, providers, staff and the community that it serves.

Health
6
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
The Charlotte Hungerford Hospital

To improve the health and healing of the people and communities we serve.

Health
9
Hartford HealthCare Corporation

Hartford HealthCare's mission is to improve the health and healing of the people and communities it serves.

Health
10
Connecticut Cancer Foundation Inc

To provide funds to benefit families affected by cancer and to support cancer research and education.

11
Universal Health Care Fndtn of Ct Inc

The Universal Health Care Foundation's mission is to be a catalyst that engages people and communities in shaping a democratic health system that provides universal access to quality health care and promotes health in Connecticut. The…

Health
12
Hartford Foundation for Public Giving

The hartford foundation for public giving puts philanthropy into action to create lasting solutions that result in vibrant communities within the greater hartford region. as the region's community foundation, it is a public, grantmaking…

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connecticut Foodshare Inc and the most unlike its peers is Our Big Fat Caribbean Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent K-12 SchoolsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community FoundationsPolicy Research and AdvocacyMilitary Veterans SupportYouth Sports ProgramsCommunity Arts CentersAnimal Rescue and ShelterCancer Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Food Banks and Pantries
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%2%<5yr12%4%5–10yr18%17%10–20yr18%23%20–35yr14%19%35–55yr20%36%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%1%<5yr12%1%5–10yr18%6%10–20yr18%11%20–35yr14%41%35–55yr20%41%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/56
the rest of the field
10%
2,153/22,389

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 103 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
50/52
Grantees still filing
34/52
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST JOSEPH UNIVERSITY — $1,270,851 · OtherST JOSEPH UNIVERSITY+74 more — $432,360 · Other+74 moreRENBROOK SCHOOL INC — $280,000 · EducationRENBROOK SCHOOL INCFordham University — $256,000 · EducationFordham University+3 more — $9,000 · EducationCONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC — $506,000 · HealthCONNECTICUT CHILDREN…+8 more — $31,005 · Health+8 moreThe Cove Center for Grieving Children Inc — $105,000 · Human ServicesNORTHWESTERN CT YMCA INC — $9,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN HARTFORD INC — $8,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHICK MISSION INC — $7,500 · Human ServicesST GERARD'S CENTER FOR LIFE INC — $7,000 · Human Services+2 more — $2,000 · Human ServicesDOG STAR RESCUE INC — $35,000 · AnimalsOur Big Fat Caribbean Rescue Inc — $2,500 · AnimalsHORIZONS INC — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsCapitol Squash Inc — $7,000 · Recreation & SportsCT CYCLING ADVANCEMENT PROGRAMINC — $2,500 · Recreation & SportsCOLLABORATIVE CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC — $12,500 · ReligionLoaves and Fishes Ministries Inc — $3,500 · Religion
Other$1,703,211Education$545,000Health$537,005Human Services$138,500Animals$37,500Recreation & Sports$19,500Religion$16,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRENBROOK SCHOOL INC — $280,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFordham University — $256,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Cove Center for Grieving Children Inc — $105,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetTHE HARTFORD COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetTHE BRIDGE FAMILY CENTER INC — $36,880 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetDOG STAR RESCUE INC — $35,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetHartford Catholic Worker Inc — $13,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetCOLLABORATIVE CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC — $12,500 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetHospital For Special Care — $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFOODSHARE INC — $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT BAR FOUNDATION — $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIndian River County Habitat for Humanity Inc — $11,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMY'S ANGELS CORPORATION — $10,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetHOUSE OF BREAD INC — $10,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHORIZONS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWINDING TRAILS INC — $10,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNEW BRITAIN MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Hartford County Bar Foundation Inc — $9,500 over 2y, 22% of budgetNORTHWESTERN CT YMCA INC — $9,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRon Foley Foundation Inc — $8,005 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetMY SISTERS' PLACE INC — $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN HARTFORD INC — $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHICK MISSION INC — $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST GERARD'S CENTER FOR LIFE INC — $7,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetCapitol Squash Inc — $7,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetHARTFORD INTERVAL HOUSE INC — $5,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRACE ACADEMY — $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FRANKLIN ACADEMY INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLoaves and Fishes Ministries Inc — $3,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDUNCASTER FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HOPE OF EASTERN CONNECTICUT — $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOur Big Fat Caribbean Rescue Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCONNECTICUT VETERANS LEGAL CENTER INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOLON CANCER COALITION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCT CYCLING ADVANCEMENT PROGRAMINC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDIAN RIVER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRISTOL ADULT RESOURCE CENTER INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLYME ART ASSOCIATION INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBOYS' & GIRLS' CLUB OF NEW BRITAIN INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetConnecticut Daughters of the American Revolution — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Hospital of Central Connecticut — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hartford Foundation for Public GivingCT43.3× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · Aetna Foundation Inc · Farmington Bank Community Foundation Inc · Liberty Bank Foundation Inc · Sandra & Arnold Chase Family Foundation Inc · Sbm Charitable Foundation Inc · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · The John G Martin Foundation · The William and Alice Mortensen Foundation · J Walton Bissell Foundation Inc · United Way Inc United Way of Cent & Ne Connecticut · Cheryl Chase & Stuart Bear Family Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sullivan Foundation Julie Coscarelli Trustee funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 230%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 25%
  • Project Hope of Eastern Connecticut100% of income from government
  • Bristol Adult Resource Center Inc94% of income from government
  • The Bridge Family Center Inc61% of income from government
  • Boys' & Girls' Club of New Britain Inc58% of income from government
  • Horizons Inc39% of income from government
  • My Sisters' Place Inc26% of income from government
  • Connecticut Bar Foundation25% of income from government
  • Connecticut Veterans Legal Center Inc12% of income from government
  • New Britain Museum of American Art Inc7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc5% of income from government
  • University of Saint Joseph2% of income from government
  • Lyme Art Association Inc1% of income from government
  • Hospital for Special Care0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
23get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
4rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sullivan Foundation Julie Coscarelli Trustee?

Find your warmest path to Sullivan Foundation Julie Coscarelli Trustee through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 103 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph