· Public charity
East 66th Street Services Inc
East 66th street services, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 4 grants below total $117,250 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $607,927 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $490,677 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $111k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JARDIN 4 LIFE | $39,750 |
| ELEMENTS OF INTERNAL MOVEMENT | $36,500 |
| FOOD DEPOT TO HEALTH INCORPORATED | $35,000 |
| CJ'S FAMOUS ANGUS | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–21, $93k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
15 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
IN OUR BACKYARDS INC2× · 2017–2019 · $62k · revenue +75%- FFFAMICOS FOUNDATION4× · 2018–2021 · $60k · revenue +118%
- MWMETRO WEST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION3× · 2018–2020 · $30k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- IIOBYone grant, 2021 · $55k
- POPRINCE OF PEACE OUTREACH AND DELIVERANCE MINISTRIESone grant, 2020 · $25k
- COCleveland Ownsgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $22k · revenue +56%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide services to its residents, business owners and stakeholders that enhance and maintain the westown neighborhoods and businesses. wcdc's service area known as westown is a vibrant, historic and culturally diverse city neighborhood…
Empowering a neighborhood through programs and services for the Buckeye Woodhill residents.
Youth-led Cultivators
The East Dayton Neighborhood Development Corporation EDNDC exists to expand access to safe decent and affordable housing while improving neighborhood amenities in Twin Towers. Our work is focused on creating lasting social economic and…
Cleveland neighborhood progress is committed to advancing its mission of fostering communities of choice and opportunity. our vision is for all of cleveland's neighborhoods to be attractive, vibrant communities where people from all…
To advance, encourage, and promote industrial, economic, and civic development in the community of madison, ohio.
Neighborhood development
Uptown partners is a community-based organization of residents, institutions, and business owners-working together to build a vibrant uptown community.
CCDCs purpose is to review and process grants, loans, tax incremental financing and provide other assistance to eligible businesses/others within the city of Cleveland. This assistance is designed to promote economic growth and to retain…
NKCDC advances social equity and economic empowerment by nurturing and creating opportunities for neighbors to live in, and actively shape, their neighborhoods of choice. (See Schedule O)
Lead based abatement in urban housing, youth skill and educational enhancement.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Clair Superior Development Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Recess Cleveland. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 13 years old; the field is 22. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 10% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 93 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BURTEN BELL CARR DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds IN OUR BACKYARDS INC ↗
- Who funds SLAVIC VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds FAMICOS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AFRICAHOUSE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds METRO WEST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST NEIGHBORHOODS CDC ↗
- Who funds Cleveland Owns ↗
- Who funds ANOTHER CHANCE OF OHIO ↗
- Who funds WESTERN RESERVE REVITALIZATION AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds JAMOCHA ARTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds Northeast Ohio Alliance for Hope ↗
- Who funds Teaching Young Women in Society Truth ↗
- Who funds DRINK LOCAL DRINK TAP INC ↗
- Who funds JEFFERSON-PURITAS WEST PARK CDC ↗
- Who funds 1000 TIES ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY CIRCLE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds SUMMER ON THE CUYAHOGA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · The Char and Chuck Fowler Family Foundation · Saint Lukes Foundation of Cleveland Ohio · The George Gund Foundation · Neighborhood Progress Inc · Shoes and Clothes for Kids · Medwish Medworks · In Our Backyards Inc · Jack Joseph & Morton Mandel Foundation · Third Federal Foundation · The McGregor Foundation · Sisters of Charity Foundation of Cleveland
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization East 66th Street Services Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to East 66th Street Services Inc?
Find your warmest path to East 66th Street Services Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.