Loading…
Loading…
Ohio · Nonprofit
NEIGHBORHOOD LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE (Ohio) is funded by 13 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $6,224,843 in grants to it, the largest being THE CLEVELAND FOUNDATION ($5,410,552). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
NEIGHBORHOOD LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE is better cushioned than half of the 3,678 community improvement nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,678 community improvement nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
Government-grant reliance: 2024 42%. Grants only — government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
96% of NEIGHBORHOOD LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (60% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
The base broadened — 2 funders to 3 as grant income moved $1k → $373k.
2 of 13 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 87% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of NEIGHBORHOOD LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 11 of 13 funders by total. Association, not causation.
NEIGHBORHOOD LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 87% of grant income and the top three 94%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 91% · 2018 95% · 2019 88% · 2020 89% · 2021 81% · 2022 71% · 2023 58% · 2024 97% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
30% of NEIGHBORHOOD LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 77% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
NEIGHBORHOOD LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE is locally rooted: 100% of its grant income comes from Ohio funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 13 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
84% of spending goes to programs.
54%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 1 state
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 13funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing