Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Succession Capital Alliance Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Youth Development$174kHuman Services$82kAnimals$37kEducation$16kHousing & Shelter$15kInternational$12kFood & Nutrition$10kArts & Culture$7kOther$0
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,025
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SADR FOUNDATION$5,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTH COAST AREA$2,025
SAINT MARTYRS ARMENIAN APOSTOLIC CHURCH$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $97k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Childhelp: $60k → 11%Elephant Cooperation: $37k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Orphanos Foundation

Christian-based aid to orphans

Human Services
2
South Carolina Network of Children's Advocacy Centers

Empowering south carolina communities and children's advocacy centers to deliver a best practice response to child abuse

Youth Development
3
Orphan Secure

Working both nationally and internationally, we counter human trafficking in the USA, Iraq, Nigeria, Libya, and the Philippines.

4
Advokids

Protecting and promoting the right of every child in foster care in California to safety, security, and a permanent home. Teaching others how to advocate for safety, security, and permanency for children in foster care.

Unclassified
5
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Manitowoc County Inc

To provide children facing adversity with strong, enduring, professionally supported one on one relationships that change their lives for the better, forever.

6
She Is Safe Inc

She Is Safe prevents, rescues and restores women and girls from abuse and exploitation in high risk communities across the globe, equipping them to build lives of freedom and faith for a strong future. We accomplish our work in partnership…

International
7
Advocates for Africa's Children Inc

Care for orphans and vulnerable children using sustainable projects

International
8
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Tampa Bay Inc

To provide children facing adversity with strong and enduring, professionally supported one-to-one relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

9
Onechild Global

One child global's mission is to advocate for children in hard places and provide holistic care so they have hope and thrive. onechild global's 355 hope centers provide holistic child development progress in nineteen countries.

International
10
Orphans of the Storm

Animal shelter operations and related pet adoption activities.

Animals
11
World Childhood Foundation Inc

The mission of the foundation is to inspire, promote, and develop solutions to end the sexual abuse and exploitation of children.

Human Services
12
Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Triangle Inc

Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth. the organization's vision is that all youth achieve their full potential.

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Brothers Big Sisters of Orange County and the Inland Empire Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sadr Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF ORANGE COUNTY AND THE INLAND EMPIRE INC — $84,500 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF ORANGE COUNTY AND THE INLAND EMPIRE INCBig Brothers Big Sisters — $75,000 · OtherBig Brothers Big SistersChildhelpGivesmart — $17,000 · OtherChildhelpGivesmartHabitat for Humanity — $15,000 · OtherHabitat for HumanityIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherAG Minassian Armenian School — $10,000 · OtherSecond Harvest Food Bank — $10,000 · Other+8 more — $24,025 · Other+8 moreCHILDHELP INC — $60,000 · Human ServicesCHILDHELP INCELEPHANT COOPERATION — $36,500 · Human ServicesELEPHANT COOPERATIONSKYHOOK FOUNDATION — $12,000 · Community ImprovementSADR FOUNDATION — $8,000 · PhilanthropyOUR RESCUE — $7,000 · Arts & CultureHUMOR TO FIGHT THE TUMOR FOUNDATION — $1,000 · Religion
Other$245,525Human Services$96,500Community Improvement$12,000Philanthropy$8,000Arts & Culture$7,000Religion$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF ORANGE COUNTY AND THE INLAND EMPIRE INC — $84,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDHELP INC — $60,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetELEPHANT COOPERATION — $36,500 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetSKYHOOK FOUNDATION — $12,000 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetSADR FOUNDATION — $8,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetOUR RESCUE — $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE SOUTH COAST AREA — $2,025 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF ORANGE COUNTY AND THE INLAND EMPIRE INC
  • Who funds CHILDHELP INC
  • Who funds ELEPHANT COOPERATION
  • Who funds SKYHOOK FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SADR FOUNDATION
  • Who funds OUR RESCUE
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE SOUTH COAST AREA
  • Who funds HUMOR TO FIGHT THE TUMOR FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Succession Capital Alliance Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph