Skip to content
Suburban Rotary Club Charitable Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Suburban Rotary Club Charitable Foundation

The major purpose of the foundation is providing scholarships for young handicapped men and women who are pursuing post-high school education.

$320k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$148kHealth$100kCommunity Improvement$62kInternational$20kFood & Nutrition$13kRecreation & Sports$7k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $233,703, the rows itemized in this filing. The $319,847 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $86,144 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $66k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $168k
$35,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S NEBRASKA$100,000
MILLARD PUBLIC SCHOOLS$68,155
ROTARY INTERNATIONAL$35,000
OMAHA PUBLIC SCHOOLS$20,548
THE ROTARY FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ROTARY CLUB OF OMAHA - SUBURBAN: $62k → 12%OUTREACH INC: $6k → 11%ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $35k → 14%THE FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND: $7k → 12%THE ROTARY FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%CHILDREN'S NEBRASKA: $100k → 12%MILLARD PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $68k → 12%MILLARD PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $17k → 12%HEALING KADI FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%OMAHA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $21k → 12%OMAHA PARKS FOUNDATION: $7k → 12%OMAHA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $7k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rotary 5950 Foundation

Providing services and assistance to people within the state of minnesota and throughout the world.

Philanthropy
2
Relief International Inc

Relief international (ri) partners with communities impacted by conflict, climate change, and disaster to save lives, build greater resilience, and promote long-term health and wellbeing of people in the communities that we serve. relief…

International
3
Trinity Health Foundation

Trinity health foundation secures charitable gifts and volunteer resources to support trinity's mission "to provide quality patient care and improve the health of the people and communities we serve."

Health
4
Fargo Park District Foundation

The purpose of the Foundation is to pursue unique fundraising opportunities and increase private sector support to further the development, growth, and excellence of the Park District in providing modernized facilities and quality…

Recreation & Sports
5
Feeding South Dakota

To eliminate hunger in south dakota.

Food & Nutrition
6
Norwegian American Hospital Foundation

Humboldt park health foundation seeks philanthropic support from individuals, businesses, foundations and community groups to help humboldt park health fulfill its mission as a premier health care provider that puts patients first and…

—
7
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
8
Food for the Hungry Inc

Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…

International
9
Minnesota Hospital Foundation

The minnesota hospital foundation works on strategies that include data-led quality and safety improvement, education, research, training and leadership to improve the health of minnesotans.

—
10
Children's Hospital & Medical Center Foundation

Children's nebraska foundation (the foundation) was created in 1981 to raise awareness and manage and distribute funds to support children's hospital & medical center's (the hospital) premier pediatric services and programs. as an advocate…

Health
11
Rotary International

Rotary is an organization of business and professional leaders united worldwide who provide humanitarian service, encourage high ethical standards in all vocations, and help build goodwill and peace in the world. The main objective of…

—
12
Iowa Health System

To improve the health of the people and communities we serve.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Rotary Foundation of Rotary International; the most unlike its peers is Healing Kadi Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
2/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MILLARD PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $85,061 · OtherMILLARD PUBLIC SCHOOLSROTARY CLUB OF OMAHA - SUBURBAN: $62,471 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF OMAHA - SUBURBANROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $35,000 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONALDOUGLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 001: $27,884 · OtherDOUGLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 001+1 more: $6,670 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER: $100,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTE…HEALING KADI FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthHEALING KADI FOUNDATIONTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $10,000 · InternationalOUTREACH INC: $6,489 · InternationalOMAHA PARKS FOUNDATION: $7,400 · Environment
Other$217,086Health$110,000International$16,489Environment$7,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROTARY CLUB OF OMAHA - SUBURBAN: $62,471 over 1y, 20% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOMAHA PARKS FOUNDATION: $7,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND: $6,670 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUTREACH INC: $6,489 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Suburban Rotary Club Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Suburban Rotary Club Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Suburban Rotary Club’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home