Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Stritecky Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$41k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What you fund
0186% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Religion$75kHuman Services$54kEducation$31kPhilanthropy$30kFood & Nutrition$7kRecreation & Sports$5kHousing & Shelter$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $32k
$250
Median grant
8
States reached
$164k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$20,500
BISHOP DUDLEY HOSPITALITY HOUSE$11,000
SCHEEL'S$4,600
THUNDER ROAD SIOUX FALLS$1,512
HAYWARD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$1,202
COMMUNITY CATHOLIC FOUNDATION$400
Individual grant recipient$350
Individual grant recipient$250
THE CATHEDRAL SACRED ARTS$250
R WINE BAR$250
AMAZON$106
DICKINSON CO HUNGER COALITION$100
SPECTRUM FOR LIVING$100
HOSPICE OF RED RIVER VALLEY$100
SIOUX FALLS HUMANE SOCIETY$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–21, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Children's Home Society: $1k → 9%CALL TO FREEDOM: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ND
MN
IL
SD
IA
NJ
CO
OK

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$166k · 16 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against -19% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
16

Total granted

$166k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
-19%

Still filing today

6%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentAnimalsPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FU
    FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    7× · 2019–2025 · $69k
  • BD
    BISHOP DUDLEY HOSPITALITY HOUSE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $45k
  • SF
    SIOUX FALLS PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    7× · 2018–2024 · $28k

Funded once

  • CT
    CALL TO FREEDOM
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue -23%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Dakota Voices for Peace

Sd voices for peace provides five programming areas to assist vulnerable communities access services throughout the state: legal services, multilingual outreach, training and education, advocacy and civic engagement and rapid response.

2
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
3
Hope Haven Inc

As followers of christ, hope haven's mission is to empower individuals with disabilities through work and life skills so that they may enjoy a productive life in their community.

4
Food Bank of Iowa

The organization receives, warehouses, and distributes salvageable food items to non-profit tax exempt member agencies to feed the ill, needy, and infants.

Food & Nutrition
5
Southeastern North Dakota Community Action Agency

Southeastern north dakota community action agency (sendcaa) was formed in 1965 to provide a range of services and activities in a six county area designed to alleviate poverty and give low-income people the opportunity to improve their…

Human Services
6
Siouxland Community Foundation

The siouxland community foundation is a trusted organization that connects people who care with causes that matter by providing a means to receive gifts and distribute grants in response to community needs.

Philanthropy
7
Catholic Charities North Dakota

Guided by our values, Catholic Charities North Dakota serves people in need and advocates for the common good of all.

8
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
9
Spectrum for Living Development Inc

To enable individuals who have developmental and/or physical disabilities to have the opportunity to attain their highest level of skills, purpose and independence.

Human Services
10
Downtown Sioux Falls

Downtown Sioux Falls boldly leads the downtown community by championing diverse experiences, economic growth, and a healthy environment.

11
St Francis House of Sioux Falls

Ecumenical not-for-profit transitional living facility for the homeless in sioux falls, south dakota. purpose is to offer hospitality, fellowship and support to those who have nowhere to sleep.

12
South Dakota Community Foundation

Receive and administer charitable gifts and permanent endowments primarily for the benefit of south dakotans. work with donors, charities, and community leaders to strengthen philanthropy in south dakota.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding South Dakota and the most unlike its peers is Peters Hope. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $68,800 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHBISHOP DUDLEY HOSPITALITY HOUSE — $44,746 · OtherBISHOP DUDLEY HOSPITALITY HOUSESIOUX FALLS PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $28,473 · OtherSIOUX FALLS PUBLIC SCHOOLS+34 more — $32,448 · Other+34 moreSIOUX FALLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $30,030 · PhilanthropySIOUX FALLS AREA…FEEDING SOUTH DAKOTA — $3,109 · Food & NutritionTHE BANQUET — $750 · Food & NutritionCALL TO FREEDOM — $2,200 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF SOUTH DAKOTA — $1,000 · Human ServicesHorizons for Youth — $250 · Youth DevelopmentPETERS HOPE — $250 · Public BenefitSIOUX FALLS AREA HUMANE SOCIETY — $100 · Animals
Other$174,467Philanthropy$30,030Food & Nutrition$3,859Human Services$3,200Youth Development$250Public Benefit$250Animals$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSIOUX FALLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $30,030 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH DAKOTA — $3,109 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCALL TO FREEDOM — $2,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF SOUTH DAKOTA — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BANQUET — $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHorizons for Youth — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPETERS HOPE — $250 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SIOUX FALLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds FEEDING SOUTH DAKOTA
  • Who funds CALL TO FREEDOM
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF SOUTH DAKOTA
  • Who funds THE BANQUET
  • Who funds Horizons for Youth
  • Who funds PETERS HOPE
  • Who funds SIOUX FALLS AREA HUMANE SOCIETY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Mike Cindy and Kylie Huether Family FoundationSD20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Mike Cindy and Kylie Huether Family Foundation · The Robert and Rita Elmen Foundation · Tenfold Foundation Inc · Sioux Steel Company Foundation · Sheldon F Reese Foundation · Larson Foundation · Interstates Foundation · Avera Health · Midcontinent Foundation · Sioux Falls Area Community Foundation Inc · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Levo Cares Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Stritecky Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Stritecky Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Stritecky Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph