Skip to content

· Private foundation

Strauss Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$230k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$491kCivil Rights$271kAnimals$252kEducation$166kArts & Culture$87kInternational$60kScience & Tech$58kEnvironment$42kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$7,100
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$70,000
SD ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$35,000
ACLU FOUNDATION OF SDIMP CNTY$25,000
CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS$15,000
PROJECT AWARE$10,000
FRANCIS PARKER SCHOOL$10,000
UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS$10,000
KPBS RADIOPRODUCERS CLUB$10,000
FRIENDS OF MEXICAN DEVELPMENT$7,500
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND$7,100
SD NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM$6,000
GLOBAL COMMUNITIES$5,000
WALDORF SCHOOL$5,000
WALDORF INSTITUTE OF SO CAL$5,000
OASIS INSTITUTE$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%OASIS INSTITUTE: $3k → 11%OASIS INSTITUTE: $3k → 11%OASIS INSTITUTE: $3k → 11%OASIS INSTITUTE: $3k → 11%OASIS INSTITUTE: $2k → 11%OASIS INSTITUTE: $2k → 11%YWCA SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $3k → 11%YWCA SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $1k → 11%YWCA SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $1k → 11%YWCA SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $1k → 11%YWCA SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $1k → 11%YWCA SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $1k → 11%YWCA SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $1k → 11%YWCA SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 25 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
1

Total granted

$1.5M
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+113%

Still filing today

36%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentCivil RightsInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $78k · revenue +69%
  • THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $58k · revenue +12%
  • SD
    San Diego Womens Chorus
    6× · 2017–2022 · $28k · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • SS
    SAVE STARLIGHT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +113%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Diego Opera Association

Mission: the mission of san diego opera is to deliver exceptional performances and exciting, accessible programs to diverse audiences, focusing on community partnerships, and the transformative and expressive power of the human voice. as…

Arts & Culture
2
Zoological Society of San Diego

San diego zoo wildlife alliance is committed to saving species worldwide by uniting our expertise in wildlife care and conservation science with our dedication to inspiring passion for nature.

Animals
3
San Diego Convention and Tourist Bureau

To drive visitor demand to economically benefit the san diego region.

—
4
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
5
Sacramento Zoological Society

The sacramento zoo inspires appreciation, respect and a connection with wildlife and nature through education, recreation and conservation.

Animals
6
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

—
7
United Way of San Diego County

To spark breakthrough community action that elevates every child and family toward a brighter future.

Philanthropy
8
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
9
Western Electricity Coordinating Council

To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.

Public Benefit
10
San Diego County Bar Association

The mission of the san diego county bar association is to be the representative of the san diego county legal profession, serving the prblic and the profession by enhancing the legal system and promoting justice, professional excellence,…

—
11
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
12
San Diego Society of Natural History

Conserving nature through science and discovery.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Diego Oasis; the most unlike its peers is Save Starlight Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $478,500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODSD ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $250,000 · OtherSD ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETYACLU FOUNDATION OF SDIMP CNTY: $193,000 · OtherACLU FOUNDATION OF SDIMP CNTYKPBS RADIOPRODUCERS CLUB: $77,500 · OtherKPBS RADIOPRODUCERS CLUBPROJECT AWARE: $49,241 · Other+12 more: $227,973 · Other+12 moreTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $78,000 · Civil RightsTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $57,718 · InternationalSan Diego Womens Chorus: $27,741 · Arts & CultureSAVE STARLIGHT INC: $1,500 · Arts & CultureENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $26,300 · EnvironmentMONTANA RAPTOR CONSERVATION CENTER INC: $2,000 · EnvironmentSAN DIEGO OASIS: $13,000 · Human ServicesYWCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $9,500 · Human ServicesFRANCIS PARKER SCHOOL: $20,000 · Education
Other$1,276,214Civil Rights$78,000International$57,718Arts & Culture$29,241Environment$28,300Human Services$22,500Education$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $78,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $57,718 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSan Diego Womens Chorus: $27,741 over 6y, 4.5% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $26,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRANCIS PARKER SCHOOL: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO OASIS: $13,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetYWCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $9,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMONTANA RAPTOR CONSERVATION CENTER INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds San Diego Womens Chorus ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds FRANCIS PARKER SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO OASIS ↗
  • Who funds YWCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA RAPTOR CONSERVATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SAVE STARLIGHT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sempra FoundationCA15× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sempra Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Strauss Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Strauss Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Strauss Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph