Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stratford Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$40k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$55kFood & Nutrition$54kYouth Development$40kHuman Services$35kArts & Culture$33kEmployment$29kPublic Safety & Disaster$13kRecreation & Sports$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$4,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$293k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,000
NORTH IOWA AG IN THE CLASSROOM$5,000
CERRO GORDO CO SHERIFF'S OFFICE$5,000
COMMUNITY KITCHEN - NORTH IOWA$4,000
STEBENS CHILDREN'S THEATER$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,500
43 NORTH IOWA$3,000
MASON CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY$2,500
CHRISTMAS CHEER FUND$1,500
BOLAN SCHOOLHOUSE & CULTURAL CTR$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HAMPTON COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN DAYCARE: $3k → 12%MASON CITY FAMILY YMCA: $7k → 12%MASON CITY FAMILY YMCA: $6k → 12%CHRISTMAS CHEER FUND: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$253k · 14 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against -7% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
14

Total granted

$253k
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
-7%

Still filing today

36%
7%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    STEBENS CHILDREN'S THEATRE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $28k · revenue +17%
  • CK
    COMMUNITY KITCHEN OF NORTH IA INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $16k · revenue +170%
  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $13k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • MA
    MACNIDER ART MUSEUM
    one grant, 2019 · $11k
  • MC
    MASON CITY FIRE DEPT
    one grant, 2021 · $7k
  • CB
    CHARLIE BROWN PRESCHOOL & CHILDCARE
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of North Central Iowa

Seeking to build a stronger, more caring community by forming partnerships with businesses, community experts, education & health & human service agencies to achieve targeted outcomes & sustained changes in community conditions which will…

Philanthropy
2
Christian Opportunity Center

Christian opportunity center (coc) provides services to over 250 people with disabilities in south central iowa. training them with the skills they need to live and work in their communities. they offer work through their community-based…

Employment
3
New Sharon Community Child Care Center Inc

To provide quality child care

Human Services
4
Magic Depot Child Care Center Inc

To provide quality childcare for children ages two weeks to twelve years.

Human Services
5
Iowa Center for Children's Justice

ICCJ assists children in custody disputes through child focused education and legal services. ICCJ provides education and legal services on a reduced fee or at no charge based on the ability to pay.

Civil Rights
6
Nemaha County Training Center Inc

Assisting people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (idd) in their quest for achieving informed lifestyle choices.

—
7
Grand View Child Development Center Inc

Provide affordable child care services to residents of des moines and surrounding communities

Human Services
8
Central Ia Center for Independent Living

To empower individuals with disabilities to control their lives.

Community Improvement
9
Iowa City Hospice Inc

To provide high-quality and compassionate care to community members approaching the end of life.

Human Services
10
Creative Community Options Inc

Supports adults with disabilities to live and work as independently as possible in the community of their choice.

Human Services
11
Webster City Day Care

Child day care center

—
12
North Iowa Christian School

Provide high quality christian education from a christian worldview in grades k-12 in north iowa keeping it financially affordable.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Iowa Transition and Employment Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Christmas Cheer Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTH IOWA AG IN THE CLASSROOM: $38,000 · OtherNORTH IOWA AG IN THE CLASSROOMFRANCIS LAUER YOUTH SERVICES: $34,500 · OtherFRANCIS LAUER YOUTH SERVICESIndividual grant recipient: $28,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSTEBENS CHILDREN'S THEATRE: $28,000 · OtherSTEBENS CHILDREN'S THEATREIndividual grant recipient: $20,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMASON CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY: $20,000 · OtherMASON CITY PUBLIC LIBRARYNIACC PERFORMING ARTSLEADERSHIP: $15,000 · OtherNIACC PERFORMING ARTSLEADERSHIPCITY OF MASON CITY IOWA: $12,000 · OtherMACNIDER ART MUSEUM: $11,000 · OtherNORTH IOWA TRANSITION AND EMPLOYMENT SERVICES INC: $9,000 · Other+16 more: $50,452 · Other+16 moreYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $12,500 · Human ServicesHAMPTON COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN DAY CARE INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTMAS CHEER FUND INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY KITCHEN OF NORTH IA INC: $15,500 · Food & NutritionOne Vision: $8,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$266,952Human Services$17,000Food & Nutrition$15,500Housing & Shelter$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTEBENS CHILDREN'S THEATRE: $28,000 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY KITCHEN OF NORTH IA INC: $15,500 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $12,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNORTH IOWA TRANSITION AND EMPLOYMENT SERVICES INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOne Vision: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTMAS CHEER FUND INC: $1,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STEBENS CHILDREN'S THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY KITCHEN OF NORTH IA INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTH IOWA TRANSITION AND EMPLOYMENT SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds One Vision ↗
  • Who funds NORTH IOWA TRANSITION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HAMPTON COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN DAY CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTMAS CHEER FUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Farrer Endowment FoundationIA24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Farrer Endowment Foundation · Bertha Stebens Charitable Foundation · First Citizens Bank Charitable Foundation · The David & Phyllis Murphy Charitable Foundation · United Way of North Central Iowa · Beth E Reinhart Charitable Trust · Lee Endowment Foundation · John K and Luise V Hanson Foundation · Blanche Carey Martin Charitable Tr · Kinney-Lindstrom Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stratford Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stratford Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Stratford Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Stratford Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stratford’s filings →

    More from the funding graph