Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Strain Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$692k
Granted FY2024still arriving
32
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$155k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Food & Nutrition$614kHousing & Shelter$514kEducation$340kEnvironment$315kCivil Rights$259kHuman Services$151kHealth$128kYouth Development$120kOther$0
02FY2024 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $350k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $305k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH$155,000
ALABAMA SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE NET$50,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF AUTAUGACHI$50,000
EMBRACE ALABAMA KIDS$50,000
ALABAMA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW AN$35,000
ALABAMA ARISE$35,000
ALZHEIMER'S OF CENTRAL AL$25,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY IN ALABAMA$25,000
ALABAMA INSTITUTE FOR DEAF AND BLIN$20,000
LOW INCOME HOUSING INITIATIVE$20,000
YOUTH LEADERSHIP FORUM$20,000
INDIAN SPRINGS SCHOOL$20,000
GIRLS INC OF CENTRAL ALABAMA$15,000
WEST ALABAMA FOOD BANK$15,000
CAHABA RIVER SOCIETY$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $126k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MAIN STREET MINISTRIES INC: $8k → 18%EMBRACE ALABAMA KIDS: $50k → 18%THE KNIGHTS AND ORCHIDS SOCIETY: $10k → 33%MAIN STREET MINISTRIES INC: $5k → 18%PRISM UNITED: $10k → 19%MAIN STREET MINISTRIES INC: $5k → 18%MAIN STREET MINISTRIES INC: $3k → 18%VILLAGE OF PROMISE: $10k → 16%KID ONE TRANSPORT SYSTEM INC: $10k → 16%KID ONE TRANSPORT: $10k → 16%FIRST LIGHT SHELTER: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
CA
KY
VA
TN
NC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.3M · 38 repeat orgs$450k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

38 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
24

Total granted

$2.3M
$163k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+19%

Still filing today

53%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $287k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEnvironmentEducationInternationalFood & NutritionCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH
    2× · 2018–2024 · $280k · revenue +49%
  • WF
    WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF ALABAMA
    4× · 2020–2023 · $75k · revenue +131%
  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    3× · 2017–2021 · $40k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • HF
    Habitat for Humanity of Florida Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +285%
  • HA
    HOUSTON AREA FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • NA
    NORTHWEST ALABAMA HABITAT FOR HUMAN
    one grant, 2017 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Food Bank of Central Alabama

To feed people in need today and foster collaborative solutions to end hunger tomorrow.

Food & Nutrition
2
Aids Alabama Inc

Aids alabama devotes its energy and resources statewide to helping people with hiv/aids live healthy, independent lives and works to prevent the spread of hiv.

Health
3
Habitat for Humanity of Baldwin County Inc

Habitat for humanity of baldwin county, inc. is an ecumenical, christian housing ministry that seeks to eliminate poverty housing by partnering with the community to make decent shelter a matter of conscience and action.

4
Alabama Partnership for Children

To work in partnership with families and organizations to ensure that all alabama children (birth to five) get everything they need to develop to their fullest potential.

Education
5
Alabama Regional Medical Services

To provide quality healthcare and related services to all communities, including the underserved and homeless persons, regardless of language, culture, or financial barriers

Health
6
Legal Aid Society of Birmingham

The Organization is a nonprofit community defender providing legal assistance through court appointment to children and other indigent persons.

Crime & Legal
7
Alabama Association of Resource Conservation and Development Councils

Coordinate rc&d activity in alabama

Environment
8
Alabama Values

A nonpartisan grassroots communication organization that works to raise awareness and increase engagement around community issues in alabama by working directly with civic organizations advocating civic participation in communities across…

Arts & Culture
9
Alabama Alliance Network

The alabama alliance netowrk works to strengthen and enhance alabama's civic society through research, education, and grantmaking

Public Benefit
10
Community Action Agency of South Alabama Inc

Administration of federal, state and local awards and grants for the poverty sector of a 7 county area in alabama, providing headstart education, food, shelter, maintenance, and weatherization programs.

11
Alabama Rural Electric Association of Cooperatives

A statewide trade association which serves as a resource through which its electric cooperative members are provided services for the continuation and advancement of the rural electrification program in Alabama.

12
Legal Services Alabama Inc

Legal services alabama is a statewide nonprofit dedicated to providing access to justice and quality civil legal assistance to educate and empower alabama's low-income community.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Black Warrior Riverkeeper Inc and the most unlike its peers is Northwest Al Mental Health Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAffordable Housing Construc…Women & Girls Leadership De…Food Banks and PantriesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Lgbtq+ Community SupportEnvironmental Conservation …Animal Rescue and ShelterIndependent K-12 SchoolsCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%22%10–20yr15%29%20–35yr12%20%35–55yr17%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr15%19%20–35yr12%19%35–55yr17%38%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/48
the rest of the field
14%
3,157/22,731

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/44
Grantees still filing
25/44
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ALABAMA SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE NET — $450,000 · OtherALABAMA SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE NETHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF AUTAUGACHI — $170,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF AUTAUGACHITHE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF AL — $159,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF ALHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $135,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INCALABAMA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW AN — $90,000 · OtherCRISIS CENTER OF BIRMINGHAM — $70,000 · Other+55 more — $921,000 · Other+55 moreUNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH — $280,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF…INDIAN SPRINGS SCHOOL — $40,000 · EducationINDIAN SPRING…+1 more — $2,000 · EducationUNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME — $50,000 · Human ServicesMAIN STREET MINISTRIES INC — $20,500 · Human ServicesKID ONE TRANSPORT SYSTEM INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesPARTNERS 4 NEW HOPE INC — $11,000 · Human ServicesPrism United — $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE KNIGHTS & ORCHIDS SOCIETY INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesVILLAGE OF PROMISE INCORPORATED — $10,000 · Human ServicesFIRST LIGHT INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $40,000 · InternationalHABITAT FOR HUMANITY MIDDLE EAST — $35,000 · InternationalLoloma Foundation — $14,800 · InternationalWOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF ALABAMA — $75,000 · PhilanthropyTHE BLACK BELT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $1,000 · PhilanthropyALABAMA COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE UNITED — $35,000 · Civil RightsSOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC — $10,000 · Civil RightsCASA OF JEFFERSON COUNTY — $10,000 · Civil RightsAlabama Rivers Alliance Inc — $26,500 · EnvironmentMobile Baykeeper Inc — $10,000 · EnvironmentCOOSA RIVERKEEPER INC — $5,000 · EnvironmentBLACK WARRIOR RIVERKEEPER INC — $5,000 · EnvironmentCAHABA RIVERKEEPER INC — $5,000 · Environment
Other$1,995,000Education$322,000Human Services$136,500International$89,800Philanthropy$86,000Civil Rights$55,000Environment$51,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH — $280,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $135,000 over 2y, 54% of budgetWOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF ALABAMA — $75,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetWEST ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC — $55,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME — $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetALABAMA ARISE ACTION — $45,000 over 2y, 48% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINDIAN SPRINGS SCHOOL — $40,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCahaba River Society Inc — $39,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetVOICES for Alabama's Children — $37,500 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY MIDDLE EAST — $35,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetALABAMA COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE UNITED — $35,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetAlabama Rivers Alliance Inc — $26,500 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetVESTAVIA HILLS SOCCER CLUB INC — $21,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetMAIN STREET MINISTRIES INC — $20,500 over 4y, 10% of budgetSERVICE DOGS ALABAMA INC — $20,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetKID ONE TRANSPORT SYSTEM INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Florida Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetHouston Habitat for Humanity Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF CENTRAL ALABAMA — $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLoloma Foundation — $14,800 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetPARTNERS 4 NEW HOPE INC — $11,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFood Bank of North Alabama Inc — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPrism United — $10,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetSOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BLACK BELT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCASA OF JEFFERSON COUNTY — $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetTHE KNIGHTS & ORCHIDS SOCIETY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHEALTHY KIDS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetVILLAGE OF PROMISE INCORPORATED — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMobile Baykeeper Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBIRMINGHAM-SOUTHERN COLLEGE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GREATER BIRMINGHAM HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOOSA RIVERKEEPER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBLACK WARRIOR RIVERKEEPER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCAHABA RIVERKEEPER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFIRST LIGHT INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST AL MENTAL HEALTH CENTER — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOINT FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
  • Who funds WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF ALABAMA
  • Who funds WEST ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME
  • Who funds ALABAMA ARISE ACTION
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
  • Who funds INDIAN SPRINGS SCHOOL
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds Cahaba River Society Inc
  • Who funds VOICES for Alabama's Children
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY MIDDLE EAST
  • Who funds ALABAMA COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE UNITED
  • Who funds Alabama Rivers Alliance Inc
  • Who funds VESTAVIA HILLS SOCCER CLUB INC
  • Who funds MAIN STREET MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds SERVICE DOGS ALABAMA INC
  • Who funds KID ONE TRANSPORT SYSTEM INC
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Florida Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Daniel Foundation of AlabamaAL39.1× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Stephens Foundation · Mike and Gillian Goodrich Foundation · The Hugh Kaul Foundation · Alabama Civil Justice Foundation · Susan Mott Webb Charitable Trust · The Gratitude Foundation · Better Place Foundation · Robert R Meyer Foundation · Protective Life Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Strain Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Strain Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Strain Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 86 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph