Skip to content

· Public charity

Story County Housing Trust

STORY COUNTY HOUSING TRUST provides low income persons in story county to innovative and flexible funding from various federal, state and local sources of revenue to produce new and preserve existing affordable housing, to promote homeownership, and support homes and transitional housing services.

$679k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$180k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$1.6MPublic Benefit$26k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $604,777, the rows itemized in this filing. The $679,468 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $74,691 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $135k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $470k
$24,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$503k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SALVATION ARMY$180,228
TUM HANDS - SERVING OTHERS$107,633
THE BRIDGE HOME$100,000
GOOD NEIGHBOR EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE$82,175
CITY OF NEVADA$33,458
CITY OF COLLINS$24,000
Individual grant recipient$17,376
ASSAULT CARE CENTER EXTENDING SHELTER AND SUPPORT$16,382
HOME ALLIES INC$15,000
STORY COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH$15,000
YOUTH & SHELTER SERVICES$13,525
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $288k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GOOD NEIGHBOR EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE: $96k → 17%GOOD NEIGHBOR EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE: $82k → 17%MAINSTREAM LIVING: $38k → 17%YOUTH & SHELTER SERVICES: $27k → 17%YOUTH & SHELTER SERVICES: $18k → 17%YOUTH & SHELTER SERVICES: $14k → 17%YOUTH & SHELTER SERVICES: $14k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 6 repeat orgs$353k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +86% since the first grant, against +46% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$1.3M
$172k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+86%
+46%

Still filing today

33%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $181k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $365k
  • TH
    TUM HANDS - SERVING OTHERS
    5× · 2021–2025 · $343k
  • AC
    ASSAULT CARE CENTER EXTENDING SHELTER AND SUPPORT
    5× · 2021–2025 · $188k

Funded once

  • ML
    MAINSTREAM LIVING INC
    one grant, 2021 · $38k · revenue +8%
  • FA
    FRIENDSHIP ARK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $38k · revenue +66%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $35k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SALVATION ARMY: $365,157 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYTUM HANDS - SERVING OTHERS: $342,962 · OtherTUM HANDS - SERVING OTHERSASSAULT CARE CENTER EXTENDING SHELTER AND SUPPORT: $188,117 · OtherASSAULT CARE CENTER EXTENDING SHELTER AND SUPPORTCITY OF COLLINS: $158,178 · OtherCITY OF COLLINSTHE BRIDGE HOME: $100,000 · OtherTHE BRIDGE HOME+8 more: $148,454 · Other+8 moreGOOD NEIGHBOR EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE INC: $177,732 · Human ServicesGOOD NEIGHBOR EMERG…YOUTH AND SHELTER SERVICES INC: $72,341 · Human ServicesYOUTH AND SHELTER S…MAINSTREAM LIVING INC: $37,654 · Human ServicesMAINSTREAM LIVING I…FRIENDSHIP ARK INC: $37,654 · Housing & ShelterHOME ALLIES INC: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterSHELTER HOUSING CORPORATION D/B/A THE BRIDGE HOME: $14,537 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,302,868Human Services$287,727Housing & Shelter$67,191

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGOOD NEIGHBOR EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE INC: $177,732 over 2y, 21% of budgetYOUTH AND SHELTER SERVICES INC: $72,341 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMAINSTREAM LIVING INC: $37,654 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDSHIP ARK INC: $37,654 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSHELTER HOUSING CORPORATION D/B/A THE BRIDGE HOME: $14,537 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GOOD NEIGHBOR EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH AND SHELTER SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds MAINSTREAM LIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP ARK INC ↗
  • Who funds HOME ALLIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SHELTER HOUSING CORPORATION D/B/A THE BRIDGE HOME ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community FdnIA20.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · United Way of Story County Inc · Prairie Meadows Race Track and Casino Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Story County Housing Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Story County Housing Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Story County Housing Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Story County Housing Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Story County Housing’s filings →

    More from the funding graph