Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stork Impact Partners Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$540k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Education$310kEnvironment$125kFood & Nutrition$100kHealth$25kCrime & Legal$10kScience & Tech$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $235k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$25,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARIST COLLEGE$250,000
EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA COALITION FOR ABANDONED MINE RECLAMATION$50,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
PAWNEE HEIGHTS SCHOOL DISTRICT$25,000
GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$25,000
FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY$25,000
FACING HUNGER FOODBANK$25,000
PITTSBURGH BOTANIC GARDEN$25,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH$25,000
WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA COALITION FOR ABANDONED MINE RECLAMATION$10,000
SHERBORN LIBRARY$10,000
RUSH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE$10,000
OIL INFORMATION LIBRARY OF FORT WORTH$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 56% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SHERBORN LIBRARY: $10k → 8%WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA COALITION FOR ABANDONED MINE RECLAMATION: $10k → 10%PITTSBURGH BOTANIC GARDEN: $25k → 11%EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA COALITION FOR ABANDONED MINE RECLAMATION: $50k → 15%MARIST COLLEGE: $250k → 9%FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY: $25k → 14%PAWNEE HEIGHTS SCHOOL DISTRICT: $25k → 15%RUSH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE: $10k → 15%FACING HUNGER FOODBANK: $25k → 19%GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $25k → 11%RUSH COUNTY EMS: $10k → 15%FACING HUNGER FOODBANK: $25k → 19%GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $25k → 11%OTIS-BISON: $30k → 15%WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY: $15k → 11%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH: $25k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Citizens Coal Council

Citizens coal council is a national grassroots watchdog organization that empowers coalfield communities to protect their homes, land, and water by holding regulators and industry accountable to fully enforce environmental laws-especially…

Environment
2
West Creek Conservancy

Our mission is to enrich the lives of all people in northeast ohio by conserving natural habitats, restoring the ecological value of our region's lands and waters, and expanding opportunities to connect people from all cultures to…

Environment
3
Earth Conservancy

Earth conservancy is a nonprofit organization committed to the reclamation and return of over 16,000 acres of former coal company-owned land to the region. it collaborates with local communities, government agencies, education…

Environment
4
Chagrin River Watershed Partners Inc

Preserving and enhancing the scenic and environmental quality of the ecosystem of the chagrin river, lake erie and other ohio watersheds in a manner which assures a sustainable future for people, plants and animals.

Human Services
5
The Ohio Environmental Council

To protect the environment and health of all ohio communities through legal and policy advocacy, decision-maker accountability, and civic engagement.

Environment
6
The Pomperaug River Watershed Coalition Inc

Prwc's mission is to protect, sustain, and restore the water resources of the pomperaug watershed through community engagement, education, advocacy, and science-based action.

Environment
7
Pennsylvania Solar Center

We provide trusted guidance to usher all pennsylvanians into the clean energy economy to reach a sustainable and resilient tomorrow.

Environment
8
Powder River Basin Resource Council

- the preservation and enrichment of wyoming's agricultural heritage and rural lifestyle. - the conservation of wyoming's unique land, mineral, water, and clean air resources consistent with responsible use of those resources to sustain…

Environment
9
Washington Water Trust

Wwt's mission is to protect and restore water in rivers and streams across washington state. washington water trust restores and protects water in rivers and streams and promotes sustainable freshwater management in washington, and, more…

Environment
10
French and Pickering Creeks Conservation Trust Inc

To preserve, steward, and connect people to the land in northern chester county pennsylvania. see additional information on schedule o.french & pickering is recognized as a leader in regional land conservation, the organization is…

Environment
11
Tour-Ed Mine & Museum
Arts & Culture
12
Delaware and Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Inc

See schedule oper the bylaws of the delaware & lehigh national heritage corridor(which were updated by the merged board of the national canal musuem and the d&l), our mission is to work with government entities, non-profit organizations…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Western Pennsylvania Conservancy; the most unlike its peers is Oil Information Library of Fort Worth. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARIST UNIVERSITY: $250,000 · EducationMARIST UNIVERSITYFACING HUNGER FOODBANK INC: $50,000 · OtherFACING HUNGER FOODBANK INCIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPAWNEE HEIGHTS SCHOOL DISTRICT: $25,000 · OtherPAWNEE HEIGHTS SCHOOL DISTRICTFORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · OtherFORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITYCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH: $25,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGHRUSH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE: $10,000 · OtherSHERBORN LIBRARY: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · Other+1 more: $5,000 · OtherEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA COALITION FOR ABANDONED MINE RECLAMATION: $50,000 · EnvironmentEASTERN PENNSYLVAN…FOUNDATION FOR OHIO RIVER EDUCATION: $25,000 · EnvironmentFOUNDATION FOR OHI…WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY: $15,000 · EnvironmentWESTERN PENNSYLVAN…WESTERN PA COALITION FOR ABANDONED MINE RECLAMATION: $10,000 · EnvironmentWESTERN PA COALITI…GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $50,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER P…Pittsburgh Botanic Garden: $25,000 · Youth Development
Education$250,000Other$190,000Environment$100,000Food & Nutrition$50,000Youth Development$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARIST UNIVERSITY: $250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA COALITION FOR ABANDONED MINE RECLAMATION: $50,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFACING HUNGER FOODBANK INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPittsburgh Botanic Garden: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR OHIO RIVER EDUCATION: $25,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWESTERN PA COALITION FOR ABANDONED MINE RECLAMATION: $10,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetOIL INFORMATION LIBRARY OF FORT WORTH: $5,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stork Impact Partners Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stork Impact Partners Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Stork Impact Partners Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Stork Impact Partners Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stork Impact Partners’ filings →

    More from the funding graph