Skip to content

· Private foundation

Storehouse Trust

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$737k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$737k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Philanthropy$737kHuman Services$75kInternational$51kReligion$40kEducation$15kHealth$15kFood & Nutrition$9kCommunity Improvement$5kOther$0
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$736,879
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIDELITY CHARITABLE DONOR ADVISED FUND$736,879
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%STREET GRACE: $5k → 9%STREET GRACE: $5k → 9%STREET GRACE: $5k → 9%STREET GRACE: $5k → 9%SOUTHTOWNS CARE CENTER: $5k → 13%STREET GRACE: $5k → 9%BUFFALO CITY MISSION: $20k → 13%BUFFALO CITY MISSION: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
NY
OH
CA
CO
MO
TN
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

12%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$115k · 6 repeat orgs$843k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +221% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
13

Total granted

$115k
$106k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+221%
+37%

Still filing today

50%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $737k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesInternationalEducationHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SG
    Street Grace Inc
    5× · 2018–2022 · $25k · revenue +221%
  • CM
    CITY MISSION SOCIETY INC
    2× · 2018–2022 · $25k · revenue -32%
  • LH
    LOVE & HOPE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2019–2022 · $20k

Funded once

  • SM
    STOREHOUSE MISSION SUPPORT INC
    one grant, 2019 · $40k · revenue -49%
  • FO
    FOCUS ON THE FAMILY
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • HT
    Haiti Teen Challengegraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +132%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
House of Refuge Faith Based
Human Services
2
Jehoyah Jireh Usa
International
3
Give Life Ny
Health
4
Project New Hope International

Publicly supported evangelical organization focused on community transformation and empowerment of impoverished neighborhoods in South America and around the world. Missionaries work with community leaders assisting them in various mission…

—
5
Life As Mission
Unclassified
6
Journey to Destiny Ministries

Journey To Destiny Ministries (JTDM) is a global, faith-based nonprofit organization committed to transforming and restoring dignity, hope, and opportunity to vulnerable individualsespecially children, women, and families affected by…

Religion
7
Real Love Ministries International

RLMI is organized exclusively for charitable purposes. Our Mission is to minister to the Haitian people beginning in the village of Laffiteau seeking to share the love of Jesus with each individual and discipling those who know Jesus as…

Religion
8
Josephs House International Organization
Human Services
9
Samaritan's Purse

Samaritan's purse is a nondenominational evangelical christian organization providing spiritual and physical aid to hurting people around the world. since 1970, samaritan's purse has helped meet the needs of people who are victims of war,…

Religion
10
Euthus Ministries
Human Services
11
Source of Hope Ministries
Religion
12
Be Hope International
Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Filter of Hope Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jericho Road Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIDELITY CHARITABLE DONOR ADVISED FUND: $736,879 · OtherFIDELITY CHARITABLE DONOR ADVISED FUND+10 more: $86,000 · Other+10 moreSTOREHOUSE MISSION SUPPORT INC: $40,000 · InternationalHaiti Teen Challenge: $10,000 · InternationalCONVOY OF HOPE: $9,000 · InternationalStreet Grace Inc: $25,000 · Human ServicesCITY MISSION SOCIETY INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesSouthtowns Care Center Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesEleazar Wheelock House Inc: $15,000 · EducationEleazar Wheelock Society Inc: $5,000 · EducationRestore Life USA Inc: $5,000 · HealthJericho Road Inc: $5,000 · Community Improvement
Other$822,879International$59,000Human Services$55,000Education$20,000Health$5,000Community Improvement$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTOREHOUSE MISSION SUPPORT INC: $40,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetStreet Grace Inc: $25,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetCITY MISSION SOCIETY INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEleazar Wheelock House Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetHaiti Teen Challenge: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCONVOY OF HOPE: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEleazar Wheelock Society Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetRestore Life USA Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSouthtowns Care Center Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetFILTER OF HOPE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STOREHOUSE MISSION SUPPORT INC ↗
  • Who funds Street Grace Inc ↗
  • Who funds CITY MISSION SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Eleazar Wheelock House Inc ↗
  • Who funds Haiti Teen Challenge ↗
  • Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds Eleazar Wheelock Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds Restore Life USA Inc ↗
  • Who funds Southtowns Care Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Jericho Road Inc ↗
  • Who funds FILTER OF HOPE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Storehouse Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Storehouse Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Storehouse Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Storehouse Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Storehouse’s filings →

    More from the funding graph