Skip to content
Stoneleigh Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Stoneleigh Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$5k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$19kYouth Development$4kHuman Services$3kReligion$3kInternational$2kHealth$1kAnimals$1kHousing & Shelter$950Other$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
2
States reached
$76k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Biltmore Scholarship Foundation$4,600
Childrens Advocacy Center$500
Mission of Hope$250
Jeffrey Pride Foundation$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 54% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%Boys Town: $100 → 12%Imani Bridges: $1k → 5%The Hope Center: $300 → 8%Adoption Center For Family Building: $100 → 14%Let It Be Us: $500 → 14%Let it Be Us: $250 → 14%Barrington Giving Day: $250 → 14%One Your Feet Foundation: $200 → 14%One Your Feet Foundation: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
NE
VA
MD
KS
TN
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$26k · 14 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +65% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
23

Total granted

$26k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+8%

Still filing today

86%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $850 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationReligionInternationalFood & NutritionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of Illinois Foundation
    3× · 2020–2023 · $5k · revenue +74%
  • PD
    PORCH DE SALOMON CORPORATION
    2× · 2021–2023 · $2k · revenue +81%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $2k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • WB
    Womens Board at RUSH
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • RV
    River Valley Animal Rescue Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +49%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
2
Feeding Illinois

Feeding illinois is a coalition of eight feeding america food banks that provide food to over 2,400 food pantries, soup kitchens, and shelters that feed nearly 1.4 million residents across the entire state of illinois.

Food & Nutrition
3
Indiana University Foundation

The Indiana University Foundation (IUF) maximizes private philanthropic support for Indiana University by fostering lifelong relationships with key stakeholders and providing advancement leadership and fundraising services for (Continued…

Education
4
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
5
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
6
The Family Institute

Our mission is to strengthen and heal families and individuals from all walks of life through clinical service, education and research.

—
7
Lutheran Child and Family Services of Illinois

Lutheran child and family services of illinois (agency) is a nonprofit statewide social service agency whose mission is to attract, develop, mobilize, and prvoide resources to improve the well-being of children, individuals, families,…

—
8
Food for the Hungry Inc

Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…

International
9
University of South Florida Foundation Inc

University of South Florida Foundation, Inc.'s mission is to provide charitable and educational aid to the University of South Florida; to promote education and other related activities of the University; and to encourage research,…

Education
10
Dominican University

Dominican University provides instruction to students seeking an Associates, Undergraduate or Graduate degree (some doctorate and certificates), and administers all of its programs without discrimination of race, color, gender, religion,…

Education
11
Feeding Indiana's Hungry Inc

By drawing on varied resources within public agencies and the private sector, we hope to provide hunger relief for those in need throughout Indiana.

Human Services
12
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Let It Be Us; the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
16/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Biltmore Scholarship Foundation: $10,700 · OtherBiltmore Scholarship FoundationWomens Board at RUSH: $4,000 · OtherWomens Board at RUSHIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherRiver Valley Animal Rescue Inc: $1,000 · Other+14 more: $3,650 · Other+14 moreUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $5,000 · EducationUniversity of Illinois F…FRIENDS OF THE FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $1,707 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE FOLDS OF …Vanderbilt University: $750 · EducationVanderbilt UniversityLSU FOUNDATION: $450 · EducationLSU FOUNDATION+1 more: $150 · EducationPORCH DE SALOMON CORPORATION: $2,000 · ReligionPORCH DE …St Leonard's Ministries: $950 · ReligionSt Leonar…MISSION OF HOPE INC MISSION OF HOPE HAITI INC: $250 · ReligionMISSION O…IMANI BRIDGES: $1,000 · Human ServicesLET IT BE US: $750 · Human ServicesThe Hope Center: $300 · Human ServicesON YOUR FEET FOUNDATION: $300 · Human ServicesBARRINGTON GIVING DAY: $250 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $100 · Human ServicesADOPTION CENTER FOR FAMILY BUILDING: $100 · Human ServicesMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,850 · InternationalWITNESS INC: $250 · InternationalISLAND DOLPHIN CARE INC: $450 · HealthJEFFREY PRIDE FOUNDATION INC: $100 · HealthSHELTER INC: $450 · Housing & ShelterNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $400 · Food & NutritionFOOD FOR GREATER ELGIN INC: $50 · Food & Nutrition
Other$20,350Education$8,057Religion$3,200Human Services$2,800International$2,100Health$550Housing & Shelter$450Food & Nutrition$450

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPORCH DE SALOMON CORPORATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,850 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $1,707 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRiver Valley Animal Rescue Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSt Leonard's Ministries: $950 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLET IT BE US: $750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVanderbilt University: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLSU FOUNDATION: $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetISLAND DOLPHIN CARE INC: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTER INC: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Hope Center: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetON YOUR FEET FOUNDATION: $300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMISSION OF HOPE INC MISSION OF HOPE HAITI INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWITNESS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBARRINGTON GIVING DAY: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUW-WHITEWATER FOUNDATION INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEFFREY PRIDE FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADOPTION CENTER FOR FAMILY BUILDING: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR GREATER ELGIN INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationFoglia Family Foundat…Arthur J Gallagher Fo…National Philanthropi…The Chicago Community…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Gs Donor Advised Phil…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…Raymond James Charita…American Endowment Fo…The Blackbaud Giving …
AbbVie FoundationIL16× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · Foglia Family Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Chicago Community Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stoneleigh Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stoneleigh Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stoneleigh’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home