Loading…
· Private foundation
Stoneleigh Foundation
This foundation accepts unsolicited grant applications.
$2.8M
Granted FY2025
28
Grants
5
Communities
$198k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 95% of Stoneleigh Foundation’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
—
2020
covid
2021
rapidphiladelphia
2022
youth engagement
2023
youth engagement
2025
alumnihealthinterventiongun violencephiladelphia
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2025 · 28 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $3k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $151k
- $50k–250k18 grants · $2.6M
$91,756
Median grant
5
States reached
$111M
Total assets
Largest grants
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (Ruth Abaya)$197,763
- Philadelphia City Fund (David Irizarry)$188,204
- Juvenile Law Center$185,500
- Rutgers University (Daniel Semenza)$182,675
- Jay Breneman$180,000
- Sarah Katz$180,000
- Vincent Reina$180,000
- Resolve Philly (Steve Volk)$179,590
- Drexel University (Arturo Zinny)$175,115
- Jessica Beard$175,000
- Jennifer Merrigan$174,980
- National Assessment Center (Anne Marie Ambrose)$174,975
- Franklin Moreno$94,082
- Oronde McClain$91,756
- Julia Zielinski$85,094
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22% — the area typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$13M · 50 repeat orgs$2.4M to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +102% since the first grant, against +63% for the ones you funded once.
50 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 41 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
50
18
Total granted
$13M
$616k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+102%
+63%
Still filing today
14%
33%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.8M went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Arts & CultureCrime & LegalEnvironmentHuman ServicesSocial ScienceHealthOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CGCULTURETRUST GREATER PHILADELPHIA2× · 2021–2022 · $107k · revenue +102%
MOVEMENT ALLIANCE PROJECT3× · 2021–2023 · $95k · revenue +149%
URBED3× · 2021–2023 · $90k · revenue +23% · 48% of their budget
Funded once
- LFLAUREN FINEone grant, 2023 · $170k
- DUDREXEL UNIVERSITY (LEAH BROGAN)one grant, 2020 · $83k
- JLJUVENILE LAW CENTER (DOMINQUE MIKELL)one grant, 2018 · $81k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Philadelphia Area Jobs With Justice
Building support for the rights of working people through coalitions of labor and community and through public education.
Employment
2
The Public Interest Law Center
The Public Interest Law Center uses high-impact legal strategies to advance the civil, social, and economic rights of communities in the Philadelphia region facing discrimination, inequality, and poverty. We use litigation, community…
Crime & Legal
3
Community Justice Project
Cjp engages in class action litigation, administrative law, legislative advocacy, and other forms of impact litigation to help create positive change for low-income residents across pennsylvania.
Crime & Legal
4
Journey Arts
Boldly leverage the power of the performing arts to catalyze social change, challenge bias, and create spaces for dialogue and understanding by presenting culturally diverse voices that celebrate and affirm our shared humanity.
Arts & Culture
5
Philadelphia Works Inc
Philadelphia works, inc. strives to build a stronger workforce through career, skills training, employment services for career seekers, business services for employers, and labor market insights for smart workforce solutions and innovation.
Employment
6
Young Playwrights Theater
Young Playwrights Theater (YPT) is committed to using theater & writing to foster dialogue, arts education, literacy & conflict resolution in communities.
Arts & Culture
7
Philadelphia Children's Alliance
Pca promotes healing and justice for sexually abused children in philadelphia. using a multidisciplinary approach, we collaborate with our partners in child protection, law enforcement, and medical and mental health services to provide…
Crime & Legal
8
Philadelphia Chinatown Development
Pcdc provides bilingual, culturally sensitive assistance and services to clients in philadelphia's chinatown neighborhood
Community Improvement
9
Youth Activism Project
The Youth Activism Project teaches teens movement-building skills to make policy impact at all levels of government. We envision a world in which youth activism is the norm, not the exception. We know that even though many young people are…
Youth Development
10
Philadelphia Legal Assistance Center
Enforcing and protecting the rights of individuals and families.
Crime & Legal
11
Young Audiences New York Inc
Using art, as a catalyst for exploring creativity and advancing equity among communities in nyc.
Arts & Culture
12
Action Wellness
Provide broad range of services to people in philadelphia infected and affected by the hiv disease and other chronic illnesses.
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Philadelphia Youth Network Inc and the most unlike its peers is Urbed. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$14,690,846Arts & Culture$341,000Crime & Legal$325,500Environment$90,000Philanthropy$40,000Human Services$30,000Social Science$10,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The Philadelphia FoundationPA23.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · The Barra Foundation Inc · Independence Public Media Of · The Patricia Kind Family Foundation · Surdna Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Scattergood Behavioral Health · Henrietta Tower Wurts Memorial · Lindback Cr & Mf Foundation Tw Main · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · The Philadelphia Cultural Fund Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation Stoneleigh Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: SLOUGHT FOUNDATION.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~49 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 4 filed years.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
4 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.1× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 010754956 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on SLOUGHT FOUNDATION, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 49 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 71% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Stoneleigh Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Stoneleigh Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines