Skip to content
Stockton Rotary Endowment at a glance

· Public charity

Stockton Rotary Endowment

To provide allocations and payments to san joaquin county, california, charitable organizations.

$99k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$165kHousing & Shelter$75kReligion$68kHuman Services$41kAnimals$31kHealth$28kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $50,971, the rows itemized in this filing. The $99,460 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $48,489 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $39k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TLC FOUNDATION FOR HOMELESS$16,316
READ TO ME STOCKTON$13,000
MARY GRAHAM CHILDRENS FOUNDAT$10,000
FAMILY PROMISE OF SAN JOAQUIN$6,287
EMERGENCY FOOD BANK$5,368
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $132k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOMENS CENTER-YOUTH & FAMILY: $15k → 12%WOMENS CENTER-YOUTH & FAMILY: $10k → 12%MARY GRAHAM CHILDRENS FOUNDAT: $10k → 12%READ TO ME STOCKTON: $15k → 12%READ TO ME STOCKTON: $14k → 12%READ TO ME STOCKTON: $13k → 12%READ TO ME STOCKTON: $11k → 12%READ TO ME STOCKTON: $11k → 12%READ TO ME STOCKTON: $10k → 12%HOSPICE OF SAN JOAQUIN: $10k → 12%HOSPICE OF SAN JOAQUIN: $7k → 12%HOSPICE OF SAN JOAQUIN: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$359k · 7 repeat orgs$86k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue -6% since the first grant, against -11% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
4

Total granted

$359k
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-6%
-11%

Still filing today

100%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    TLC Foundation for Homeless Children of San Joaquin County
    7× · 2017–2024 · $85k · revenue -49% · 28% of their budget
  • RT
    Read to Me Stockton
    6× · 2020–2025 · $74k · revenue -16%
  • SM
    ST MARY'S COMMUNITY SERVICES
    7× · 2017–2023 · $68k · revenue +828%

Funded once

  • OV
    OTHER VARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS
    one grant, 2018 · $31k
  • SU
    STOCKTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 1852 FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $6k
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION OF SAN JOAQUIN
    one grant, 2022 · $6k · revenue -11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stockton 209 Cares

Stockton 209 cares is a local nonprofit that empowers the homeless in becoming self sugffient and employs them to clean up . we work with the homeless in finding housing and other resources. stockton 209 cares holds several community events

Human Services
2
Family Promise of San Joaquin County

To help reduce homelessness and support low income families in san joaquin county to achieve sustainable independence through a community-based response.

Human Services
3
Sunshine for Humanity Inc

Homeless Shelter

Health
4
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
5
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Santa Rosa

Catholic charities creates access to opportunities for self-sufficiency by providing innovative and compassionate services to people of all backgrounds, beliefs, and cultures.

Human Services
6
Stockton Harm Reduction Program Inc

The mission of shrp is to provide harm reduction services to people who use drugs and unhoused individuals in san joaquin county.

Health
7
Children's Home of Stockton Inc

CHS guides youth and young adults forward to hope and resiliency.

—
8
Sacramento Self-Help Housing Inc

To assist persons who are homeless or at risk of becoming homeless to find and retain stable and affordable housing.

—
9
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Fresno

Respecting the presence of God among us, we serve, advocate for and empower those in need. In carrying out the social mission of the Roman Catholic Church in the Diocese of Fresno, the Organization provides food, clothing, housing support,…

Human Services
10
Spirit of Santa Paula

Serve the homeless and hungry families by providing food and basic life necessities and by partnering with other social service and government agencies for the purpose of ending homelessness, improving mental health conditions, restoring…

Religion
11
The Particular Council of the Society of St Vincen de Paul of Santa Clara County

Outreach to those in need within the diocese of san jose. provides assistance in the form of spiritual (visits to the sick and imprisoned) or tangible services (assistance with rent, utilities,furniture, clothing, and medical expenses).

Religion
12
Hands of Hope Resources for Homeless Families

Hands of Hope works to enhance the quality of life in the Yuba-Sutter area by: Providing core support services to the homeless; Reintegrating the homeless within our community; Engaging the community to respond to the challenge of…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Mary's Community Services; the most unlike its peers is Read to Me Stockton. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
2/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Read to Me Stockton: $74,110 · Human ServicesRead to Me StocktonPREVAIL CA: $25,098 · Human ServicesPREVAIL CAHospice of San Joaquin: $22,461 · Human ServicesHospice of San JoaquinMARY GRAHAM CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesMARY GRAHAM CHILDRENS FOUNDATIONTLC Foundation for Homeless Children of San Joaquin County: $84,871 · EducationTLC Foundation for Home…STOCKTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 1852 FOUNDATION: $6,000 · EducationSTOCKTON UNIFIED SCHOOL…ST MARY'S COMMUNITY SERVICES: $68,000 · Food & NutritionST MARY'S COMMUNI…OTHER VARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS: $31,350 · OtherOTHER VARIOUS OR…TLC FOUNDATION FOR HOMELESS: $16,316 · OtherTLC FOUNDATION F…FAMILY PROMISE OF SAN JOAQUIN: $6,287 · OtherFAMILY PROMISE O…ST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION OF SAN JOAQUIN: $5,651 · OtherST JOSEPH'S FOUN…EMERGENCY FOOD BANK: $5,368 · OtherEMERGENCY FOOD B…GOSPEL CENTER RESCUE MISSION INC: $53,500 · Housing & ShelterGOSPEL CENTER …Stockton Shelter For The Homeless: $5,500 · Housing & ShelterStockton Shelt…Delta Stockton Humane Society & Society For The PR: $31,301 · Animals
Human Services$131,669Education$90,871Food & Nutrition$68,000Other$64,972Housing & Shelter$59,000Animals$31,301

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTLC Foundation for Homeless Children of San Joaquin County: $84,871 over 7y, 28% of budgetRead to Me Stockton: $74,110 over 6y, 12% of budgetST MARY'S COMMUNITY SERVICES: $68,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetGOSPEL CENTER RESCUE MISSION INC: $53,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetDelta Stockton Humane Society & Society For The PR: $31,301 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetPREVAIL CA: $25,098 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHospice of San Joaquin: $22,461 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMARY GRAHAM CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION OF SAN JOAQUIN: $5,651 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetStockton Shelter For The Homeless: $5,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEMERGENCY FOOD BANK: $5,368 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rosi Cerri Foundation…San Joaquin Community…The Cortopassi Family…The Antone and Marie …Crete Family Foundati…Port City Operating C…Vaquero FoundationThe 54 FundSunlight GivingThe C a Webster Found…Michael Family Founda…Coastal Barrier Islan…
Rosi Cerri Foundation IncCA26.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rosi Cerri Foundation Inc · San Joaquin Community Foundation Inc · The Cortopassi Family Foundation · The Antone and Marie Raymus Foundation · Crete Family Foundation · Port City Operating Company LLC · Vaquero Foundation · The 54 Fund · Sunlight Giving · The C a Webster Foundation Co Bonner W Mendez Director · Michael Family Foundation · Coastal Barrier Island Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stockton Rotary Endowment funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stockton Rotary Endowment. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stockton Rotary Endowment’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home