Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Stich Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$755k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$255k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232025.

Youth Development$490kEducation$309kAnimals$280kCommunity Improvement$178kEmployment$50kHuman Services$50kFood & Nutrition$15kHousing & Shelter$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $430k
  • $250k+1 grant · $255k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JESSE LEWIS CHOOSE LOVE MOVEMENT INC$255,000
DOG STAR RESCUE INC$130,000
WOMENS MENTORING NETWORK INC$100,000
WOOFGANG AND CO$50,000
CATHOLIC ACADEMY OF BRIDGEPORT INC$50,000
JESSE LEWIS CHOOSE LOVE MOVEMENT INC$50,000
LIVEGIRL$50,000
JESSE LEWIS CHOOSE LOVE MOVEMENT INC$30,000
FISH FRIENDS IN SERVICE TO HUMANITY OF NORTHWESTER$15,000
AREA CONGREGATIONS TOGETHER INC$15,000
JESSE LEWIS CHOOSE LOVE MOVEMENT INC$4,350
WOMENS MENTORING NETWORK INC$3,400
INNER COMPASS INITIATIVE INC$1,400
JESSE LEWIS CHOOSE LOVE MOVEMENT INC$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%LIVEGIRL: $50k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 4 repeat orgs$155k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
1

Total granted

$1.2M
$24k

Still filing today

75%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $131k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentAnimalsCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JL
    JESSE LEWIS CHOOSE LOVE MOVEMENT INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $490k · revenue 0%
  • CA
    CATHOLIC ACADEMY OF BRIDGEPORT INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $285k
  • DS
    DOG STAR RESCUE INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $280k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • CS
    COLLEGE STREET CAPITAL CORPORATION
    one grant, 2023 · $24k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Haven Works Inc

To grow the local economy and improve economic stability in all communities by providing employers with a trained and qualified workforce and connecting residents to jobs.

Education
2
Together We Bake

Together We Bake's mission is to provide a comprehensive workforce training and personal development program to help women gain self-confidence, transferable workforce skills, and invaluable hands-on experience which will allow them to…

Human Services
3
Goodwill of Western and Northern Connecticut Inc

Goodwill of western and northern ct (gwnc) strengthens communities by eliminating barriers to employment and maximizing the independence of all people served.

Employment
4
Women's Business Development Council Inc

Tthe mission of the women's business development council (wbdc) is to support economic prosperity for women and strengthen communities through entrepreneurial and financial education services that create and grow sustainable jobs and…

Education
5
Womens Network Inc

Womens Coop is women helping women working together to improve lives families and our community. We foster an active network of support that provides much needed resources for career training education and life management.

Human Services
6
Northwest Regional Workforce Investment Board Inc

Northwest regional workforce investment board, inc is a not-for-profit corporation organized to develop and oversee a complete system of services for the employment and training of connecticut's workforce, concentrating in danbury,…

7
Opportunities Industrialization Center of New Britain Inc

Our mission is to help people to help themselves by contributing to the more efficient functioning of todays labor market by providing high quality employment and training.

8
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
9
Womens Employment Network

Our Mission is to help women raise their self-esteem and achieve economic independence through sustained employment. Our Vision is to advance positive change in the lives of women, their families and the community, one woman at a time.

Employment
10
Eastern Connecticut Workforce Investment Board Inc

EWIB efficiently coordinates employment-related services in concert with a multitude of state and local agencies at benefit to both businesses and job-seekers. These services offer new opportunities and/or skills to the regional workforce,…

Employment
11
The Connecticut Center for Nursing Workforce Inc

To foster collaborations to ensure a highly educated, diverse and sustainable nursing workforce to support the healthcare needs of connecticut residents.

Health
12
United Way of Meriden & Wallingford Inc

The united way of meriden and wallingford is a volunteer-driven organization that redirects human and financial resources to create lasting change in our communities by supporting residents to gain an education and training sufficient to…

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fishfriends in Service to Humanity of and the most unlike its peers is Inner Compass Initiative Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
2/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JESSE LEWIS CHOOSE LOVE MOVEMENT INC — $490,350 · Youth DevelopmentJESSE LEWIS CHOOSE LOVE MOVEMENT INCCATHOLIC ACADEMY OF BRIDGEPORT INC — $285,000 · OtherCATHOLIC ACADEMY OF BRIDG…COLLEGE STREET CAPITAL CORPORATION — $23,500 · OtherCOLLEGE STREET CAPITAL CO…DOG STAR RESCUE INC — $280,000 · AnimalsDOG STAR RESCUE INCWOMEN'S MENTORING NETWORK INC — $178,400 · Community ImprovementWOMEN'S MENTOR…LiveGirl Inc — $50,000 · Human ServicesTEAM WOOFGANG & CO INC — $50,000 · EmploymentFISHFRIENDS IN SERVICE TO HUMANITY OF — $15,000 · Housing & ShelterAREA CONGREGATIONS TOGETHER INC — $15,000 · Housing & ShelterINNER COMPASS INITIATIVE INC — $1,400 · Health
Youth Development$490,350Other$308,500Animals$280,000Community Improvement$178,400Human Services$50,000Employment$50,000Housing & Shelter$30,000Health$1,400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJESSE LEWIS CHOOSE LOVE MOVEMENT INC — $490,350 over 2y, 11% of budgetDOG STAR RESCUE INC — $280,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetWOMEN'S MENTORING NETWORK INC — $178,400 over 2y, 28% of budgetLiveGirl Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetTEAM WOOFGANG & CO INC — $50,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ge Aerospace FoundationCT11.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ge Aerospace Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Stich Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 30%
  • Fishfriends in Service to Humanity of39% of income from government
  • Area Congregations Together Inc30% of income from government
  • Women's Mentoring Network Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph