Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stewart Sullivan Scholarship Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$61k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$408k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $34k
$2,700
Median grant
2
States reached
$765k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EASTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY$20,250
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY$13,500
SOUTHWESTERN OREGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE FD$2,700
GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY$2,700
UNIVERSITY OF OREGON$2,700
OREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$2,700
TREASURE VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE$2,700
OHSU$2,700
KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY$2,700
LINFIELD UNIVERSITY$2,700
PHAGANS' COSMETOLOGY COLLEGE$2,700
PACIFIC UNIVERSITY$2,700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 20%PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $3k → 8%GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY: $3k → 11%BLUE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $6k → 12%OHSU: $3k → 12%PHAGANS' COSMETOLOGY COLLEGE: $3k → 14%EASTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY: $20k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF OREGON: $3k → 15%OREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $3k → 16%SOUTHWESTERN OREGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE FD: $3k → 17%TREASURE VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $3k → 20%LINFIELD UNIVERSITY: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$373k · 10 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
9

Total granted

$373k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+40%

Still filing today

30%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PU
    PACIFIC UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2019–2025 · $20k · revenue +7%
  • GF
    GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2019–2025 · $10k · revenue +31%
  • LU
    Linfield University
    2× · 2024–2025 · $8k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • CO
    CENTRAL OREGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • WO
    WESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Portland State University Foundation

Portland state university foundation is responsible for raising and managing private resources to advance psu's priorities and mission to be a leading urban university.

—
2
Augustana College

Offer a challenging education that develops the qualities of mind, spirit and body for students.

Education
3
Trustees of Clark University

Clark university's mission is to educate undergraduate and graduate (continued in schedule o)students to be imaginative and contributing citizens of the world, and to advance the frontiers of knowledge and understanding through rigorous…

Education
4
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
5
Furman University

Furman university is an institution of higher education providing distinctive undergraduate education emphasizing an engaged approach combining classroom learning with real world experiences and self-discovery.

Education
6
Ashland University

Institution of higher education

Education
7
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
8
University of Denver

A higher educational institution, providing both undergraduate and graduate degrees.

Education
9
University of the Pacific

To provide a superior, student-centered learning experience integrating liberal arts and professional education and preparing individuals for lasting achievement and responsible leadership in their careers and communities.

Education
10
Westminster College

Promote education, the development of skills, knowledge, and personal qualities.

Education
11
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
12
Trinity College

Trinity is a comprehensive institution offering a broad range of educational programs that prepare students across the lifespan for the intellectual, ethical, and spiritual dimensions of contemporary work, civic and family life.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Portland; the most unlike its peers is Blue Mountain Community College Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EASTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY: $163,300 · OtherEASTERN OREGON UNIVERSITYOREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $80,000 · OtherOREGON STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF OREGON: $31,220 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF OREGONOREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $16,210 · OtherBLUE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $16,000 · OtherTREASURE VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $15,710 · OtherSOUTHERN OREGON UNIVERSITY: $12,510 · Other+11 more: $30,800 · Other+11 morePACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $20,210 · EducationPACIFIC UNI…GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY: $9,700 · EducationGEORGE FOX …Linfield University: $7,700 · EducationLinfield Un…CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $2,500 · EducationCORPORATION…UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND: $2,000 · Education
Other$365,750Education$42,110

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $20,210 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY: $9,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLinfield University: $7,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN OREGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $2,700 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PACIFIC UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Linfield University ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN OREGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ronald M Mackenzie Athletic Scholarship FundWI13.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ronald M Mackenzie Athletic Scholarship Fund · West Scholarship Fnd · Wayne C Stewart Foundation Uma · Eminger Stewart Foundation Uma · Leo Adler Trust · The Ford Family Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stewart Sullivan Scholarship Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stewart Sullivan Scholarship Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Pacific University: 5% of income from government
  • Linfield University: 4% of income from government
  • George Fox University: 3% of income from government
  • University of Portland: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stewart Sullivan Scholarship’s filings →

More from the funding graph