Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stewart Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$465kHealth$295kEnvironment$265kEducation$226kCommunity Improvement$170kPhilanthropy$79kInternational$35kMembership Benefit$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$15,000
ST JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%VIP EDUCATION FUND: $15k → 11%THE KASIISI PROJECT: $25k → 8%THE KASIISI PROJECT: $20k → 12%MAYO CLINIC: $15k → 9%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $25k → 12%JAMES M STEWART MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $40k → 14%WORLD SAVVY: $15k → 10%FACE FORWARD INC: $40k → 14%THE ACTORS FUND OF AMERICA: $20k → 17%ENDANGER HEALTH: $35k → 14%HEARTLAND FILM FESTIVAL: $30k → 16%WILD EARTH ALLIES: $35k → 8%VIP EDUCATION FUND: $15k → 11%THE KASIISI PROJECT: $25k → 8%THE KASIISI PROJECT: $20k → 12%MAYO CLINIC: $15k → 9%JAMES M STEWART MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $40k → 14%FACE FORWARD INC: $25k → 14%CA WATER IMPACT: $100k → 14%ENTERTAINMENT COMMUNITY FUND: $20k → 17%HEARTLAND FILM FESTIVAL: $30k → 16%WILD EARTH ALLIES: $30k → 8%THE KASIISI PROJECT: $20k → 8%JAMES M STEWART MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%THE LEAKY FOUNDATION: $42k → 10%FACE FORWARD INC: $25k → 14%CA WATER IMPACT: $20k → 14%FAUNA & FLORA INTERNATIONAL INC: $20k → 14%HEARTLAND FILM FESTIVAL: $30k → 16%WILD EARTH ALLIES: $20k → 8%THE KASIISI PROJECT: $20k → 8%JAMES M STEWART MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%THE LEAKY FOUNDATION: $37k → 10%FAUNA & FLORA INTERNATIONAL INC: $20k → 14%HEARTLAND FILM FESTIVAL: $30k → 16%WILD EARTH ALLIES: $20k → 8%JAMES M STEWART MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%FAUNA & FLORA INTERNATIONAL INC: $20k → 14%HEARTLAND FILM FESTIVAL: $30k → 16%WILD EARTH ALLIES: $20k → 8%JAMES M STEWART MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%FAUNA & FLORA INTERNATIONAL INC: $20k → 14%HEARTLAND FILM FESTIVAL: $30k → 16%JAMES M STEWART MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%FAUNA & FLORA INTERNATIONAL INC: $20k → 14%HEARTLAND FILM FESTIVAL: $30k → 16%CITY OF HOPE: $50k → 14%FAUNA & FLORA INTERNATIONAL INC: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
IN
PA
CA
MD
AZ
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 17 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +70% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
3

Total granted

$1.6M
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+16%

Still filing today

59%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureInternationalHealthEnvironmentEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HEARTLAND FILM INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $210k · revenue +47%
  • JM
    JAMES M STEWART MUSEUM FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $205k · revenue +31% · 33% of their budget
  • WE
    Wild Earth Allies Inc
    7× · 2017–2023 · $145k · revenue +129%

Funded once

  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -4%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF WONI INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • AH
    Arizona Humane Society
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
2
Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc

The Fossey Fund is dedicated to the conservation and study of gorillas in Africa through a successful, people-centered approach: 1) Providing daily protection to gorillas, 2) Scientific research providing critical data on gorillas and…

—
3
International Society for Arts Science and Technology Dba LeonardoISAST

The mission of the Organization is to identify new avenues to serve the art, science, and technology community. The Organization is recognized as a global leader in the interdisciplinary world of art, science, and technology. For over 50…

—
4
Global Forest Generation

Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…

Environment
5
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
6
Foundation for Art and Preservation in Embassies

The Foundation for Art and Preservation in Embassies (FAPE) is dedicated to enhancing the United States' image abroad through American Art. Founded as a public-private, non-partisan partnership in 1986, FAPE works with the U.S. Department…

Arts & Culture
7
Asia Wild

Asia Wild is committed to rescuing and protecting the welfare of animals worldwide. They support small, locally-focused organizations that tirelessly combat numerous issues that threaten wildlife survival, including poaching, abuse,…

Animals
8
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
9
International Fund for Animal Welfare Inc

IFAWs strategy focuses on improving the welfare of individual animals and the conservation status of wildlife populations in priority habitats through on-the-ground efforts community engagement and global advocacy. Our dual emphasis on…

Animals
10
Amazon Conservation Association

Amazon conservation unites science, people, and innovation to protect the amazon - the greatest wild forest on earth. as guardians of the most iconic forest on the planet, we bring together the power of the latest science and technology…

Environment
11
Donor Alliance Inc

Donor Alliance saves and heals lives through organ and tissue donation. Donor Alliance is one of 55 Federally designated, non-profit organ procurement organizations serving Colorado and most of Wyoming. Additionally, it is a member of the…

Health
12
Natural History Institute

Natural History Institute is organized to provide leadership and resources for a revitalized practice of natural history that integrates art, science, and humanities to promote the health and well-being of humans and the rest of the…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Actors' Fund of America; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HEARTLAND FILM INC: $210,000 · Arts & CultureHEARTLAND FILM INCJAMES M STEWART MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $205,000 · Arts & CultureJAMES M STEWART MUSEUM FOUNDAT…SOUTHERN ALLEGHENIES MUSEUM OF ART: $50,000 · Arts & CultureSOUTHERN ALLEGHENIES MUSEUM OF…Individual grant recipient: $120,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE LEAKY FOUNDATION: $78,513 · OtherTHE LEAKY FOUNDATIONCITY OF HOPE: $65,000 · OtherCITY OF HOPEENDANGER HEALTH: $45,000 · OtherENDANGER HEALTHST JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER: $40,000 · OtherST JOHN'S HEALTH CENTERGORILLA DOCTORSMGVP INC: $30,000 · OtherJOY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $26,000 · OtherWorld Savvy: $65,000 · OtherWorld SavvyInternational Rescue Committee INC: $25,000 · OtherTHE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA: $40,000 · OtherTHE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA+3 more: $30,000 · OtherFACE FORWARD INC DBA FACE FORWARD INTERNATIONAL: $150,000 · HealthFACE FORWAR…MAYO CLINIC: $30,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICWild Earth Allies Inc: $145,000 · EnvironmentWild Eart…KASIISI PROJECT INC: $135,000 · EducationFAUNA & FLORA INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $120,000 · PhilanthropyVIP Education Fund: $105,000 · Community Improvement
Arts & Culture$465,000Other$564,513Health$180,000Environment$145,000Education$135,000Philanthropy$120,000Community Improvement$105,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEARTLAND FILM INC: $210,000 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetJAMES M STEWART MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $205,000 over 7y, 33% of budgetFACE FORWARD INC DBA FACE FORWARD INTERNATIONAL: $150,000 over 7y, 18% of budgetWild Earth Allies Inc: $145,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetKASIISI PROJECT INC: $135,000 over 7y, 22% of budgetFAUNA & FLORA INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $120,000 over 6y, 5.1% of budgetVIP Education Fund: $105,000 over 7y, 17% of budgetWorld Savvy: $65,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetSOUTHERN ALLEGHENIES MUSEUM OF ART: $50,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetTHE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetArizona Humane Society: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HEARTLAND FILM INC ↗
  • Who funds JAMES M STEWART MUSEUM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FACE FORWARD INC DBA FACE FORWARD INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Wild Earth Allies Inc ↗
  • Who funds KASIISI PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds FAUNA & FLORA INTERNATIONAL USA INC ↗
  • Who funds VIP Education Fund ↗
  • Who funds World Savvy ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN ALLEGHENIES MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds THE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds Arizona Humane Society ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stewart Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stewart Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stewart’s filings →

    More from the funding graph