How much did STEWART FAMILY FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 46% of STEWART FAMILY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

children's educationlongmonteducation therapypoor

2020

homeless poorfeed homelesslongmontdental

2021

affordable housinghousing poorhomeless poorlongmontfeed homeless

2022

libararyaffordable housinghousing poorhomeless poorfeed homelesslongmont

2023

affordable housinghousing poordental poorfeed homelesshomeless poorlongmont

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k2 grants · $9k
$10k–50k2 grants · $23k
$50k–250k6 grants · $751k
$250k+8 grants · $11M

$200,000

Median grant

States reached

$5.9M

Total assets

Largest grants

FRIENDS OF THE LONGMONT MUESUEM$4,202,000
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION$2,824,774
TLC LEARNING CENTER$2,120,000
THE INN BETWEEN$345,000
OUR CENTER OF LONGMONT$336,500
ROBERTAS LEGACY$315,000
A WOMAN'S WORK$309,000
SUNSHINE CLUB OF LONGMONT$284,000
BPS FOUNDATION$200,000
FRIENDS OF THE LONGMONT LIBRARY$192,500
LONGMONT MEALS ON WHEELS$166,500
WELD FOOD BANK$79,000
ESTES VALLEY LIBRARY FRIENDS AND FOUNDATION$59,000
STEPPING STONES OF WINDSOR$54,000
RAABE FAMILY DENTISTRY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$13,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $668k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$24M · 17 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +128% since the first grant, against -6% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$24M

$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+128%

-6%

Still filing today

59%

67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $209k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

UO
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION
6× · 2019–2024 · $6.8M · revenue +40%
TL
TLC LEARNING CENTER
7× · 2018–2024 · $5.2M · revenue +128% · 53% of their budget
AW
A WOMANS WORK
6× · 2019–2024 · $505k · revenue +152% · 37% of their budget

Funded once

LU
LONGMONT UNITED HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
one grant, 2021 · $1.0M · revenue -68% · 52% of their budget
CO
CITY OF LONGMONT MUSEUM
one grant, 2019 · $80k
HO
HAVEN OF HOPE
one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -6%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Meals On Wheels of Boulder Inc

The mission of meals on wheels is to provide nutritious meals to residents of the community who need and want their services, regardless of age or income.

Food & Nutrition

Foothills Food Bank

The Foothills Food Bank works to ensure access to quality, nutritious food to community members in need, and deliver services with respect and dignity.

—

Harvest of Hope Pantry

Harvest of hope pantry's mission is to provide healthy supplemental food to boulder families and individuals in need of food assistance within a safe, welcoming and non-judgemental environment.

Food & Nutrition

Longmont Economic Development

Providing information and services to existing and prospective businesses and industries; stimulating business economic development, which will be of benefit to the citizens, businesses and city of longmont, colorado.

—

Feeding Colorado

Collaboration and advocacy for the five feeding america food banks in co and wy.

Food & Nutrition

Friends of the Longmont Public Library

The Friends of the Longmont Public Library fund all programs produced by the library.

—

Homeless Outreach Providing

The mission of the organization is to provide life-sustaining services and programsfocusing on dignity, empowerment and self-sufficiency. the organization provides the onlyyear-round overnight service center for the homeless community in…

Human Services

The Lovve Project

Our mission is to combat food scarcity and promote health and well-being by ensuring access to nutritious food and essential hygiene supplies. we bring neighbors together with the shared goal of building community and supporting each other…

Food & Nutrition

Foothills Food Bank

Provide food and financial assistance to the local community.

—

Colorado Food Cluster Inc

Provide opportunities for all to thrive by offering free food resources to communities.

Food & Nutrition

Laramie Soup Kitchen

The laramie soup kitchen is a non-profit organization working to increase access to quality, nutritious food so that every person who is hungry or alone may share a meal without cost.

Human Services

Housing Resources of Western Colorado

To provide affordable housing and to promote the wise and sustainable use of the earth's resources.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Longmont United Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Stepping Stones of Windsor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

15/15

Grantees still filing

12/15

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Education$12,024,330Other$11,418,500Human Services$672,500Health$490,000Food & Nutrition$150,000Housing & Shelter$100,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO21× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Longmont Community Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Horsfall Family Foundation · Ray Lanyon Fund · Lynn & Helen N Clark Crt · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation STEWART FAMILY FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: TLC LEARNING CENTER.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~12 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.3× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 840523717 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on TLC LEARNING CENTER, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 12 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 53% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Stewart Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Stewart Family Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

STEWART FAMILY FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Stewart Family Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

STEWART FAMILY FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Stewart Family Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph