Skip to content
Plinth

· Community foundation

Stewardship Foundation Inc

To provide funding to diverse christian organizations

$107k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Religion$56kHuman Services$51kFood & Nutrition$38kInternational$34kCivil Rights$17kEducation$17k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 8 grants below total $77,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $106,680 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $29,680 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $56k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BETHESDA HEALING MINISTRY$14,000
40 DAYS FOR LIFE$11,500
WOMEN'S CARE CENTER$10,000
HOLY FAMILY SOUP KITCHEN$10,000
HEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL$10,000
CHRISTIAN HOME EDUCATORS OF OHIO$8,000
STUDENTS FOR LIFE$7,000
RENEWAL MINISTRIES$6,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 82% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ROBBINSDALE WOMEN CENTER: $11k → 11%40 DAYS FOR LIFE: $12k → 22%HEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 5%CHRISTIAN HOME EDUCATORS OF OHIO: $8k → 10%HOLY FAMILY SOUP KITCHEN: $10k → 15%STUDENTS FOR LIFE: $5k → 8%STUDENTS FOR LIFE: $7k → 15%ROBBINSDALE WOMEN CENTER: $10k → 11%40 DAYS FOR LIFE: $6k → 22%HEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL: $6k → 5%HOLY FAMILY SOUP KITCHEN: $9k → 15%STUDENTS FOR LIFE: $5k → 8%HEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL: $6k → 5%HOLY FAMILY SOUP KITCHEN: $8k → 15%HOLY FAMILY SOUP KITCHEN: $6k → 15%HOLY FAMILY SOUP KITCHEN: $5k → 15%HEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL: $6k → 15%HEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL: $6k → 15%BETHESDA HEALING MINISTRY: $5k → 15%BETHESDA HEALING MINISTRY: $5k → 15%WOMEN'S CARE CENTER: $10k → 15%WOMEN'S CARE CENTER: $10k → 15%WOMEN'S CARE CENTER: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 100% of Stewardship Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 66% of the giving stays in OH; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Stewardship Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$205k · 8 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against -8% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
1

Total granted

$205k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
-8%

Still filing today

88%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionCivil RightsHealthEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HI
    HEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $34k · revenue +38%
  • WC
    WOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $30k · revenue +18%
  • RW
    ROBBINSDALE WOMEN'S CENTER
    2× · 2021–2022 · $21k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • CH
    Christian Home Educators of Ohio In
    one grant, 2025 · $8k · revenue -8%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Women for Life of Winchester Inc

Protection of the welfare of unborn children council, assistance, and promotion of the sanctity of human life in the context of Christian witness.

2
Anns New Life Center for Women Inc

Serving women with unplanned pregnancies through services, material and spiritual direction, assist in improving moral and social conditions, advancing Gospel of Jesus, connecting with resources to assist with necessary life needs.

Civil Rights
3
Pregnancy Care Center of Wayne County Inc

Offer pregnancy test, abstinence programs , post-abortion bible studies, assistance with material need, first trimester ultrasounds, mens mentoring program, parenting classes.services are free and confidential with focus in wayne co oh…

Health
4
My Choices Pregnancy Help Clinic Inc

An outreach ministry committed to presenting the gospel of jesus christ to women with crisis pregnancies in both word and deed.

Health
5
Hope Life Center Inc

Our mission at hope life center is to reach the community with the gospel of jesus christ by meeting physical, emotional and spiritual needs of women, men and their unborn children.

Human Services
6
Heartbeats for Life

Heartbeats is a life-affirming ministry committed to impacting the lives we serve with the love of christ. see schedule o for complete mission statement.

Civil Rights
7
Education for Life Inc

The Womens Pregnancy Center is a Christ-centered ministry designed to engage and inform women in unplanned pregnancies, empowering them to make life-affirming decisions.

Health
8
New Life Pregnancy Center

New life pregnancy center is a christ-centered ministry committed to upholding the sanctity of human life by demonstrating the love of christ to those facing unplanned pregnancies through the provision of spiritual, physical, and emotional…

Health
9
Mary's Choices Inc

To foster a Christ-like view of human life and sexuality by offering hope and compassionate help to women experiencing an unplanned pregnancy.

Human Services
10
Family Life Services Inc

The mission of the bella womens centr is to demonstrate the compassion of jesus christ and provide pregnancy-related services that support life for both mother and child.

11
Hope Womens Center

Affirming the life of the preborn child, we provide medical and educational services to women in unplanned pregnancies, and those who significantly influence them, by encouraging Christ-centered, life affirming and healthy lifestyle…

Human Services
12
Mission Pre-Born Inc

Mission: pre-born, inc. was formed as an indiana not-for-profit organization in 2007 and is a results oriented ministry designed to strategically impact the abortion industry. mission: pre-born has the following mission and values (see…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is 40 Days for Life and the most unlike its peers is Christian Home Educators of Ohio in. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HOLY FAMILY CHURCH — $38,250 · OtherHOLY FAMILY CHURCHHEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL INC — $34,000 · OtherHEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL INCROBBINSDALE WOMEN'S CENTER — $21,000 · OtherROBBINSDALE WOMEN'S CENTERBETHESDA HEALING MINISTRY INC — $30,000 · ReligionBETHESDA HEALING MINISTRY INCRENEWAL MINISTRIES INC — $17,500 · ReligionRENEWAL MINISTRIES INCChristian Home Educators of Ohio In — $8,000 · ReligionChristian Home Educators of O…WOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC — $30,000 · HealthWOMEN'S CARE CE…Students for Life of America Inc — $17,000 · Civil RightsStudents …40 DAYS FOR LIFE — $17,000 · Education40 DAYS F…
Other$93,250Religion$55,500Health$30,000Civil Rights$17,000Education$17,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL INC — $34,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBETHESDA HEALING MINISTRY INC — $30,000 over 4y, 51% of budgetROBBINSDALE WOMEN'S CENTER — $21,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetRENEWAL MINISTRIES INC — $17,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetStudents for Life of America Inc — $17,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget40 DAYS FOR LIFE — $17,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Stewardship Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph