Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Steven & Jacqueline Miller Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2024still arriving
43
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222024.

International$22kArts & Culture$20kHealth$14kFood & Nutrition$12kEducation$8kPublic Benefit$7kRecreation & Sports$3kEnvironment$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$250
Median grant
10
States reached
$523k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$5,000
FOOD GATHERERS$5,000
BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$5,000
KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT$2,000
OAKWOOD SCHOOLS$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
BOONSHOFT MUSEUM$1,000
CARE$1,000
CULTUREWORKS$1,000
CITY OF OAKWOOD$750
UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS$500
Individual grant recipient$500
NEON THEATER$500
UNITED WAY - FOOD BANK$500
DAYTON CONTEMPORARY DANCE COMPANY$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $5k → 16%STANFORD SQUASH: $1k → 8%FOOD GATHERERS: $5k → 14%CARE: $1k → 13%CITY OF OAKWOOD: $4k → 14%UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS: $500 → 14%AMERICAN WORLD JEWISH SERVICES: $500 → 10%BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $5k → 16%STANFORD SQUASH: $1k → 8%FOOD GATHERERS: $5k → 14%CARE: $1k → 13%CITY OF OAKWOOD: $2k → 14%UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS: $500 → 14%AMERICAN WORLD JEWISH SERVICES: $500 → 10%STANFORD SQUASH: $1k → 8%CARE: $1k → 13%CITY OF OAKWOOD: $750 → 14%UNITED WAY - GEMVDISABILITY SERVICES: $500 → 16%UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS: $500 → 14%UNITED WAY - FOOD BANK: $500 → 16%KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT: $2k → 14%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $5k → 17%UNITED WAY - GEMVDISABILITY SERVICES: $500 → 16%KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT: $2k → 14%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $5k → 17%UNITED WAY - FOOD BANK: $500 → 16%KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT: $2k → 14%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $5k → 17%UNITED WAY - GEMVDISABILITY SERVICES: $500 → 16%UNITED WAY - FOOD BANK: $500 → 16%ENSEMBLE THEATER OF CINCINNATI: $350 → 16%NPR FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%NPR FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%NPR FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%OAKWOOD SCHOOLS: $1k → 14%OAKWOOD SCHOOLS: $1k → 14%BOONSHOFT MUSEUM: $1k → 14%BOONSHOFT MUSEUM: $1k → 14%BOONSHOFT MUSEUM: $1k → 14%CULTUREWORKS: $1k → 14%CULTUREWORKS: $1k → 14%NEON THEATER: $1k → 14%CULTUREWORKS: $1k → 14%DAYTON CONTEMPORARY DANCE COMPANY: $600 → 14%NEON THEATER: $500 → 14%DAYTON CONTEMPORARY DANCE COMPANY: $500 → 14%NEON THEATER: $500 → 14%DAYTON CONTEMPORARY DANCE COMPANY: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
CA
DE
DC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$90k · 43 repeat orgs$400 to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +6% since the first grant, against -21% for the ones you funded once.

43 repeat relationships — 43 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
2

Total granted

$90k
$400

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
-21%

Still filing today

42%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
InternationalArts & CultureHealthEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $15k · revenue +13%
  • FG
    FOOD GATHERERS
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +23%
  • CW
    CULTURE WORKS
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    one grant, 2022 · $250 · revenue -21%
  • W
    WBEZ
    one grant, 2022 · $150

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

2
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
3
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
4
Us Digital Response

U.s. digital response is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that helps governments, nonprofits, and public entities respond quickly to critical public needs. the organization serves the public by leveraging a network of pro bono…

Public Safety & Disaster
5
Npr International Operations Inc

Npr international operations, inc. ("nprio") supports the international newsgathering activities of national public radio, inc. through bureaus and offices established locally in foreign countries.

6
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
7
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
8
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
9
Cdp North America Inc

Cdp north america, inc. 's ("cdp-na") vision for the future is a thriving economy that works for people and planet in the long term. we focus investors and companies on taking urgent action to build a truly sustainable economy by measuring…

Environment
10
National Cable Satellite Corporation

Provide the public access to the live gavel-to-gavel proceedings of both houses of the us congress, and other forums where public policy is discussed, debated, and decided - all without editing, commentary or analysis and with a balanced…

Arts & Culture
11
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
12
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners

Founded in 1889, the national association of regulatory utility commisioners (naruc) is a non-profit organization dedicated to representing the state public service commisions who regulate the utilities that provide essential services such…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Human Rights Watch Inc and the most unlike its peers is Reach Out of Montgomery County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
10/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE — $10,000 · OtherBOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINEFOOD GATHERERS — $10,000 · OtherFOOD GATHERERSDEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES OF CLARK COUNTY — $6,850 · OtherDEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES OF CLARK COUNTYKELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT — $6,000 · OtherKELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENTBOONSHOFT MUSEUM — $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $3,000 · Other+25 more — $21,850 · Other+25 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $15,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES…COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $3,000 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTAN…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $750 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC — $750 · International+1 more — $250 · InternationalCULTURE WORKS — $3,000 · Arts & CultureDAYTON CONTEMPORARY DANCE COMPANY — $1,600 · Arts & CultureENSEMBLE THEATRE OF CINCINNATI — $900 · Arts & CultureDAYTON THEATRE GUILD — $750 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $300 · Arts & CultureREACH OUT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY — $750 · HealthTHE J DAVID GLADSTONE INSTITUTES — $750 · HealthNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $750 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $750 · Environment
Other$60,700International$19,750Arts & Culture$6,550Health$1,500Environment$1,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD GATHERERS — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCULTURE WORKS — $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDAYTON CONTEMPORARY DANCE COMPANY — $1,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNPR FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetENSEMBLE THEATRE OF CINCINNATI — $900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetREACH OUT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY — $750 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MUSE MACHINE INC — $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE J DAVID GLADSTONE INSTITUTES — $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDAYTON THEATRE GUILD — $750 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC — $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds FOOD GATHERERS
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC
  • Who funds CULTURE WORKS
  • Who funds DAYTON CONTEMPORARY DANCE COMPANY
  • Who funds NPR FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ENSEMBLE THEATRE OF CINCINNATI
  • Who funds REACH OUT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY
  • Who funds THE MUSE MACHINE INC
  • Who funds THE J DAVID GLADSTONE INSTITUTES
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds DAYTON THEATRE GUILD
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dayton FoundationOH17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dayton Foundation · Dayton Foundation Depository · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Steven & Jacqueline Miller Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph