Skip to content

· Private foundation

Steven & Jacqueline Miller Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2024still arriving
43
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

International$22kArts & Culture$20kHealth$14kFood & Nutrition$12kEducation$8kPublic Benefit$7kRecreation & Sports$3kEnvironment$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$250
Median grant
10
States reached
$523k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$5,000
BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$5,000
FOOD GATHERERS$5,000
KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT$2,000
BOONSHOFT MUSEUM$1,000
CARE$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
OAKWOOD SCHOOLS$1,000
CULTUREWORKS$1,000
CITY OF OAKWOOD$750
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$500
UNITED WAY - FOOD BANK$500
NEON THEATER$500
NPR FOUNDATION$500
UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $5k → 16%STANFORD SQUASH: $1k → 8%FOOD GATHERERS: $5k → 14%CARE: $1k → 13%CITY OF OAKWOOD: $4k → 14%UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS: $500 → 14%AMERICAN WORLD JEWISH SERVICES: $500 → 10%BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $5k → 16%STANFORD SQUASH: $1k → 8%FOOD GATHERERS: $5k → 14%CARE: $1k → 13%CITY OF OAKWOOD: $2k → 14%UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS: $500 → 14%AMERICAN WORLD JEWISH SERVICES: $500 → 10%STANFORD SQUASH: $1k → 8%CARE: $1k → 13%CITY OF OAKWOOD: $750 → 14%UNITED WAY - FOOD BANK: $500 → 16%UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS: $500 → 14%UNITED WAY - FOOD BANK: $500 → 16%KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT: $2k → 14%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $5k → 17%UNITED WAY - FOOD BANK: $500 → 16%KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT: $2k → 14%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $5k → 17%UNITED WAY - GEMVDISABILITY SERVICES: $500 → 16%KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT: $2k → 14%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $5k → 17%UNITED WAY - GEMVDISABILITY SERVICES: $500 → 16%UNITED WAY - GEMVDISABILITY SERVICES: $500 → 16%ENSEMBLE THEATER OF CINCINNATI: $350 → 16%NPR FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%NPR FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%NPR FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%OAKWOOD SCHOOLS: $1k → 14%OAKWOOD SCHOOLS: $1k → 14%BOONSHOFT MUSEUM: $1k → 14%BOONSHOFT MUSEUM: $1k → 14%BOONSHOFT MUSEUM: $1k → 14%CULTUREWORKS: $1k → 14%NEON THEATER: $1k → 14%CULTUREWORKS: $1k → 14%CULTUREWORKS: $1k → 14%DAYTON CONTEMPORARY DANCE COMPANY: $600 → 14%NEON THEATER: $500 → 14%DAYTON CONTEMPORARY DANCE COMPANY: $500 → 14%DAYTON CONTEMPORARY DANCE COMPANY: $500 → 14%NEON THEATER: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
CA
DE
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$90k · 43 repeat orgs$400 to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +8% since the first grant, against -21% for those funded once.

43 repeat relationships: 43 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
2

Total granted

$90k
$400

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
-21%

Still filing today

42%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
InternationalArts & CultureHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $15k · revenue +13%
  • FG
    FOOD GATHERERS
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +23%
  • CW
    CULTURE WORKS
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    one grant, 2022 · $250 · revenue -21%
  • W
    WBEZ
    one grant, 2022 · $150
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
2
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
3
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
4
Us Digital Response

U.s. digital response is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that helps governments, nonprofits, and public entities respond quickly to critical public needs. the organization serves the public by leveraging a network of pro bono…

Public Safety & Disaster
5
Npr International Operations Inc

Npr international operations, inc. ("nprio") supports the international newsgathering activities of national public radio, inc. through bureaus and offices established locally in foreign countries.

—
6
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
7
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
8
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
9
Cdp North America Inc

Cdp north america, inc. 's ("cdp-na") vision for the future is a thriving economy that works for people and planet in the long term. we focus investors and companies on taking urgent action to build a truly sustainable economy by measuring…

Environment
10
National Cable Satellite Corporation

Provide the public access to the live gavel-to-gavel proceedings of both houses of the us congress, and other forums where public policy is discussed, debated, and decided - all without editing, commentary or analysis and with a balanced…

Arts & Culture
11
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
12
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners

Founded in 1889, the national association of regulatory utility commisioners (naruc) is a non-profit organization dedicated to representing the state public service commisions who regulate the utilities that provide essential services such…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Human Rights Watch Inc; the most unlike its peers is Reach Out of Montgomery County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $10,000 · OtherBOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINEFOOD GATHERERS: $10,000 · OtherFOOD GATHERERSDEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES OF CLARK COUNTY: $6,850 · OtherDEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES OF CLARK COUNTYKELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT: $6,000 · OtherKELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENTBOONSHOFT MUSEUM: $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · Other+25 more: $21,850 · Other+25 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $15,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES…COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $3,000 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTAN…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $750 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $750 · International+1 more: $250 · InternationalCULTURE WORKS: $3,000 · Arts & CultureDAYTON CONTEMPORARY DANCE COMPANY: $1,600 · Arts & CultureENSEMBLE THEATRE OF CINCINNATI: $900 · Arts & CultureDAYTON THEATRE GUILD: $750 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $300 · Arts & CultureREACH OUT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY: $750 · HealthTHE J DAVID GLADSTONE INSTITUTES: $750 · HealthNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $750 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $750 · Environment
Other$60,700International$19,750Arts & Culture$6,550Health$1,500Environment$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD GATHERERS: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCULTURE WORKS: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDAYTON CONTEMPORARY DANCE COMPANY: $1,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNPR FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetENSEMBLE THEATRE OF CINCINNATI: $900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetREACH OUT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY: $750 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MUSE MACHINE INC: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE J DAVID GLADSTONE INSTITUTES: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDAYTON THEATRE GUILD: $750 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD GATHERERS ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds CULTURE WORKS ↗
  • Who funds DAYTON CONTEMPORARY DANCE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds NPR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ENSEMBLE THEATRE OF CINCINNATI ↗
  • Who funds REACH OUT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds THE MUSE MACHINE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE J DAVID GLADSTONE INSTITUTES ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds DAYTON THEATRE GUILD ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dayton FoundationOH17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dayton Foundation · Dayton Foundation Depository · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Steven & Jacqueline Miller Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Steven & Jacqueline Miller Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Steven & Jacqueline Miller Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph