Skip to content

· Private foundation

Steve Urvan Foundation for Philanthropic Pursuits Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$220kHuman Services$141kRecreation & Sports$72kAnimals$41kHealth$20kEducation$17kArts & Culture$15kYouth Development$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$356k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WHITE COUNTY UNITED WAY$15,000
EAGLE RANCH$10,000
EDMONDSON TELFORD CENTER FOR CHILDREN$6,000
LAKEVIEW ATHLETIC CLUB SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION$5,000
ALEXANDER-THARPE FUND$4,729
MUSTANG AND WILD HORSE RESCUE OF GEORGIA$2,500
CHARLES-SMITHGALL HUMANE SOCIETY$2,500
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY RELAY FOR LIFE$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LAKEVIEW ATHLETIC CLUB SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%MORTEN ANDERSEN FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 9%EAGLE RANCH: $20k → 12%CHARLES-SMITHGALL HUMANE SOCIETY: $3k → 12%ALEXANDER-THARPE FUND: $3k → 13%MARIST SCHOOL: $10k → 14%EVAN OGLESBY FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%THE DWELLING: $5k → 16%LAKEVIEW ATHLETIC CLUB SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%MORTEN ANDERSEN FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 9%EAGLE RANCH: $10k → 12%EVAN OGLESBY FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%MORTEN ANDERSEN FAMILY FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%EAGLE RANCH: $10k → 12%MORTEN ANDERSEN FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 9%EAGLE RANCH: $10k → 12%MORTEN ANDERSEN FAMILY FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%EAGLE RANCH: $10k → 12%MORTEN ANDERSEN FAMILY FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%EAGLE RANCH: $10k → 12%NORTHSIDE HOSPITAL BREAST CANCER FUND: $3k → 9%EAGLE RANCH: $10k → 12%EAGLE RANCH: $10k → 12%EDMONDSON TELFORD CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $7k → 12%WHITE COUNTY UNITED WAY: $26k → 12%EDMONDSON TELFORD CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $6k → 12%WHITE COUNTY UNITED WAY: $26k → 12%MUSTANG AND WILD HORSE RESCUE OF GEORGIA: $6k → 13%EDMONDSON TELFORD CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $6k → 12%WHITE COUNTY UNITED WAY: $26k → 12%MUSTANG AND WILD HORSE RESCUE OF GEORGIA: $6k → 13%EDMONDSON TELFORD CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 12%WHITE COUNTY UNITED WAY: $26k → 12%EDMONDSON TELFORD CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 12%WHITE COUNTY UNITED WAY: $26k → 12%EDMONDSON TELFORD CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 12%WHITE COUNTY UNITED WAY: $15k → 12%EDMONDSON TELFORD CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 12%WHITE COUNTY UNITED WAY: $15k → 12%EDMONDSON TELFORD CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 12%WHITE COUNTY UNITED WAY: $15k → 12%EDMONDSON TELFORD CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 12%WHITE COUNTY UNITED WAY: $15k → 12%ALEXANDER-THARPE FUND: $5k → 13%ALEXANDER-THARPE FUND: $3k → 13%ALEXANDER-THARPE FUND: $3k → 13%ALEXANDER-THARPE FUND: $3k → 13%ALEXANDER-THARPE FUND: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
IN
CA
MO
AZ
NC
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$511k · 17 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against +42% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
17

Total granted

$511k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+42%

Still filing today

41%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsEducationHealthCrime & LegalAnimalsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EAGLE RANCH INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +37%
  • ET
    EDMONDSON TELFORD CENTER FOR CHILDREN I
    9× · 2017–2025 · $49k · revenue +138%
  • TC
    THE CHARLES SMITHGALL HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $15k · revenue +389%

Funded once

  • MS
    MARIST SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • TD
    THE DWELLING
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • NH
    NORTHSIDE HOSPITAL BREAST CANCER FUND
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Morehouse School of Medicine

Leading the creation and advancement of health equity we exist to improve the health and well-being of individuals and communities, increase the diversity of the health professional and scientific workforce, and address primary health care…

Education
2
The Webb Schools

Webb's mission is to provide a dynamic learning community that nurtures and inspires our students and alumni to think boldly, mindfully, and creatively; act with honor and moral courage; lead with distinction; and serve with a generous…

Education
3
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
4
Mental Health Center of Boulder County Inc

Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.

—
5
The German Marshall Fund of the United States

The german marshall fund of the united states (gmf) strives to champion democratic values and the transatlantic alliance by strengthening civil society, forging bold and innovative policy ideas, and developing a new generation of leaders…

International
6
Blythedale Children's Hospital

Blythedale children's hospital is dedicated to improving the health & well-being of children. blythedale is a leader in the diagnosis & treatment of children with disabling and complex medical conditions.

Health
7
The Marine Mammal Center

The marine mammal center advances global ocean conservation through marine mammal rescue and rehabilitation, scientific research, and education. the center's work is guided and inspired by a shared vision of a healthy ocean for marine…

Animals
8
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
9
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
10
The University of Montana Foundation

The university of montana foundation inspires philanthropic support to enhance excellence and opportunity at the university of montana.

Education
11
The Institute of World Politics

The institute of world politics is a graduate school of national security and international affairs, dedicated to developing leaders with a sound understanding of international realities and the ethical conduct of statecraft, based on…

International
12
Western University of Health Sciences

To produce, in a humanistic tradition, health care professionals and biomedical knowledge that will enhance and extend the quality of life in our communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wikimedia Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Morten Andersen Family Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WHITE COUNTY UNITED WAY: $189,800 · OtherWHITE COUNTY UNITED WAYALEXANDER-THARPE FUND: $23,479 · OtherALEXANDER-THARPE FUNDAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY RELAY FOR LIFE: $16,500 · OtherTHE CHARLES SMITHGALL HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $15,000 · OtherEVAN OGLESBY FOUNDATION: $15,000 · OtherLAKEVIEW ATHLETIC CLUB SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $12,500 · Other+20 more: $37,711 · Other+20 moreEAGLE RANCH INC: $90,280 · HealthEAGLE RANCH INCTHE MORTEN ANDERSEN FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE MORTEN A…+1 more: $250 · Recreation & SportsEDMONDSON TELFORD CENTER FOR CHILDREN I: $49,210 · Crime & LegalEDMONDSON …MUSTANG AND WILD HORSE RESCUE OF GEORGIA INC: $26,000 · AnimalsTHE SAMANTHA AND KYLE BUSCH BUNDLE OF JOY FUND: $1,000 · PhilanthropyWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $550 · EducationJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL: $100 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $50 · Education
Other$309,990Health$90,280Recreation & Sports$60,250Crime & Legal$49,210Animals$26,000Philanthropy$1,000Education$700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEAGLE RANCH INC: $90,280 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MORTEN ANDERSEN FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 6y, 14% of budgetEDMONDSON TELFORD CENTER FOR CHILDREN I: $49,210 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetMUSTANG AND WILD HORSE RESCUE OF GEORGIA INC: $26,000 over 9y, 5.1% of budgetTHE CHARLES SMITHGALL HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $15,000 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetTHE SAMANTHA AND KYLE BUSCH BUNDLE OF JOY FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGEORGIA MOUNTAIN WOMEN'S CENTERINC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASSOCIATION OF THE GRADUATES OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY: $625 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOCA HELPING HANDS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EAGLE RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MORTEN ANDERSEN FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EDMONDSON TELFORD CENTER FOR CHILDREN I ↗
  • Who funds MUSTANG AND WILD HORSE RESCUE OF GEORGIA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHARLES SMITHGALL HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SAMANTHA AND KYLE BUSCH BUNDLE OF JOY FUND ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA MOUNTAIN WOMEN'S CENTERINC ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION OF THE GRADUATES OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Good Golfers Better People of Metro Atlanta Inc ↗
  • Who funds JOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds BOCA HELPING HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA9.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Steve Urvan Foundation for Philanthropic Pursuits Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Steve Urvan Foundation for Philanthropic Pursuits Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Steve Urvan Foundation for Philanthropic Pursuits Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Steve Urvan Foundation for Philanthropic Pursuits Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Steve Urvan Foundation for Philanthropic Pursuits’ filings →

    More from the funding graph