Skip to content
Steve and Julie Williams Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Steve and Julie Williams Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$145k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Youth Development$160kReligion$21kHuman Services$20kHealth$6kArts & Culture$2kPhilanthropy$2kRecreation & Sports$1kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CROSSOVER MISSION$100,000
THE ROARING GAP FOUNDATION$10,000
ST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$10,000
PALM BEACH COUNTY YOUTH FOR CHRIST$10,000
CROSSOVER MISSION$5,000
CROSSNORE$2,500
JOHNS ISLAND COMMUNITY SERVICE LEAGUE$1,150
CHERRY LANE FIRE DEPARTMENT$1,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY$1,000
JOHNS ISLAND FOUNDATION$1,000
OLD TOWN CLUB$800
VERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART$500
ALLEGHANY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$500
YMCA OF THE TRIANGLE$500
ROARING GAP CLUB$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%YMCA OF THE TRIANGLE: $500 → 8%CRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$165k · 3 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
8

Total granted

$165k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+20%

Still filing today

67%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
PhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    CROSSOVER MISSION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $156k · revenue -37%
  • C
    CROSSNORE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $5k
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $4k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • CRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue +96%
  • CC
    CHILD CARE RESOURCES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue +13%
  • YC
    YMCA CHAPEL HILL CARRBORO
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Edgartown Yacht Club

The edgartown yacht club was founded in 1905 to perpetuate the maritime traditions of edgartown and martha's vineyard. the mission of the club is to bring together those who have an abiding interest in yachting, sailboat racing, seamanship…

—
2
Essex County Club

Essex county club (the "club") is a private country club which has recreational programs including golf, tennis, paddle tennis, as well as a full service restaurant, bar, & function facilities.

—
3
Gibson Island Club Inc

To cater to its members' needs & provide a place where members can socialize with peers. the club provides facilities such as a marina, golf course, tennis courts, & dining room

—
4
Marco Island Yacht Club Inc

To bind its members together by a common objective to provide leisure and recreation.

Recreation & Sports
5
Glen View Club

To operate as a private club for the social, athletic pleasure, recreation and benefits of its members.

—
6
Edgewater Yacht Club Inc

To promote, protect, and encourage the sport of boating; to encourage the members to become familiar with and to adhere to the rules and laws of navigation and seamanship, and to promote and encourage socialibility and friendship among…

—
7
White River Yacht Club Inc

To provide club members with a facility for leisure activities, including a boat dock, bar and food service, meeting rooms and boat storage.

—
8
Manatee County Girls Club Foundation Inc

To raise and manage funds for the long-term support and self-sufficiency of the manatee county girls club, inc. and to serve as trustee for certain assets of the club.

Youth Development
9
Congressional Country Club Inc

Congressional country club is a full amenity private club committed to providing its members with access to professional level championship quality golf courses, tennis courts, swimming pools and fitness facilities. the club also provides…

—
10
Community First Credit Union of Florida

Community first credit union of florida's mission is to provide the highest in quality financial solutions for every stage of life.

—
11
Bellerive Country Club

Bellerive is a social club that operates golf, swimming, racquets, bocce and clubhouse facilities exclusively for its members and guests.

—
12
Childcare Resources of Indian River Inc

To ensure the availability and affordability of high quality early childhood and family support programs for children of income eligible working families in indian river county.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Club of Indian River County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Alleghany Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
6/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CROSSOVER MISSION INC: $156,000 · Youth DevelopmentCROSSOVER MISSION INC+1 more: $3,500 · Youth DevelopmentPalm Beach County Youth For Christ Inc: $10,000 · OtherPalm Beach County Youth…THE ROARING GAP FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherTHE ROARING GAP FOUNDAT…ST PAULS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherST PAULS EPISCOPAL CHUR…CROSSNORE: $5,000 · OtherCROSSNORECHILD CARE RESOURCES INC: $2,500 · OtherCHILD CARE RESOURCES IN…YMCA CHAPEL HILL CARRBORO: $2,500 · OtherYMCA CHAPEL HILL CARRBO…+5 more: $4,150 · Other+5 moreCRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesThe Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598): $500 · Human ServicesTHE JOHN'S ISLAND FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INC: $500 · PhilanthropyAlleghany Memorial Hospital Foundation INC: $500 · PhilanthropyRIVERSIDE THEATRE INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureVERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC: $500 · Arts & CultureCHERRY LANE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT INC: $1,000 · Public Safety & DisasterOLD TOWN CLUB INC: $800 · Recreation & SportsWHOLE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC: $500 · Health
Youth Development$159,500Other$44,150Human Services$3,000Philanthropy$2,000Arts & Culture$1,500Public Safety & Disaster$1,000Recreation & Sports$800Health$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCROSSOVER MISSION INC: $156,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetPalm Beach County Youth For Christ Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD CARE RESOURCES INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN'S ISLAND COMMUNITY SERVICE LEAGUE INC: $1,150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JOHN'S ISLAND FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHERRY LANE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRIVERSIDE THEATRE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOLD TOWN CLUB INC: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHOLE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlleghany Memorial Hospital Foundation INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROARING GAP CLUB INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598): $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ron and Nancy Ros…The Berghorst Foundat…Indian River Communit…The Ayco Charitable F…The Winston-Salem Fou…Raymond James Charita…American Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…Morgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…National Philanthropi…Fidelity Investments …
The Ron and Nancy Rosner Charitable Foundation IncVA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ron and Nancy Rosner Charitable Foundation Inc · The Berghorst Foundation Inc · Indian River Community Foundation Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Winston-Salem Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Steve and Julie Williams Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Steve and Julie Williams Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • United Way of Indian River County Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Whole Family Health Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Steve and Julie Williams Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home